Adam Leverett
P Arkansas Travelers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | AAPHI | 35 | 8 | 64 | 3.94 | 3.55 | 19.0% | 9.9% | — | K 15.4% · BB 10.8% · FIP 4.09 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 20 | 102 | 4.07 | 3.77 | 14.9% | 7.1% | — | K 12.6% · BB 7.7% · FIP 4.11 |
| 2026 | 27 | AASEA | 21 | 20 | 96 | 5.06 | 4.89 | 21.4% | 7.0% | — | K 17.4% · BB 7.7% · FIP 5.89 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBSEA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.15 | 5.15 | 17.4% | 7.8% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBSEA | 3 | 3 | 18 | 5.14 | 5.19 | 17.8% | 8.2% | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 30 | MLBSEA | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5.21 | 5.31 | 17.9% | 8.6% | 0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Phillies East | 2 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1.8 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 2.45 | -0.28 | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK RAW | GCL Phillies East | 2 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1.8 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 2.45 | -0.17 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 21 | 17 | 85 | 351 | 90 | 31 | 7 | 81% | 4.1 | 20.4% | 10.0% | 10.5% | 1.4% | 3.48 | 3.41 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 21 | 17 | 85 | 351 | 90 | 31 | 7 | 81% | 4.1 | 25.6% | 8.8% | 16.8% | 2.0% | 3.48 | 3.15 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 29 | 11 | 75 | 330 | 84 | 28 | 14 | 38% | 2.6 | 20.6% | 9.3% | 11.3% | 4.8% | 5.54 | 5.20 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | Reading Fightin Phils | 29 | 11 | 75 | 330 | 84 | 28 | 14 | 38% | 2.6 | 25.5% | 8.5% | 17.0% | 4.2% | 5.54 | 4.41 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 35 | 8 | 64 | 274 | 52 | 27 | 4 | 23% | 1.8 | 15.4% | 10.8% | 4.5% | 1.7% | 3.94 | 4.09 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | AA RAW | Reading Fightin Phils | 35 | 8 | 64 | 274 | 52 | 27 | 4 | 23% | 1.8 | 19.0% | 9.9% | 9.1% | 1.5% | 3.94 | 3.55 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 20 | 102 | 422 | 63 | 30 | 8 | 87% | 4.4 | 12.6% | 7.7% | 4.9% | 2.0% | 4.07 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 20 | 102 | 422 | 63 | 30 | 8 | 87% | 4.4 | 12.6% | 7.7% | 4.9% | 2.0% | 4.07 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 20 | 102 | 422 | 63 | 30 | 8 | 87% | 4.4 | 14.9% | 7.1% | 7.8% | 1.9% | 4.07 | 3.77 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Arkansas Travelers | 21 | 20 | 96 | 401 | 86 | 28 | 20 | 95% | 4.6 | 17.4% | 7.7% | 9.7% | 6.0% | 5.06 | 5.89 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Arkansas Travelers | 21 | 20 | 96 | 401 | 86 | 28 | 20 | 95% | 4.6 | 17.4% | 7.7% | 9.7% | 6.0% | 5.06 | 5.89 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA RAW | Arkansas Travelers | 21 | 20 | 96 | 401 | 86 | 28 | 20 | 95% | 4.6 | 21.4% | 7.0% | 14.5% | 5.0% | 5.06 | 4.89 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | SEA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 17.4% | 7.8% | 9.6% | 3.9% | 5.15 | 5.15 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | SEA | 10 | 10 | 57 | 242 | 43 | 20 | 10 | 100% | 5.7 | 17.8% | 8.2% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 5.14 | 5.19 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | SEA | 8 | 8 | 50 | 212 | 38 | 18 | 9 | 100% | 6.3 | 17.9% | 8.6% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 5.21 | 5.31 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | SEA | 3 | 3 | 18 | 76 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.8% | 8.2% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 5.14 | 5.19 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | SEA | 4 | 4 | 26 | 110 | 20 | 9 | 5 | 100% | 6.5 | 17.9% | 8.6% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 5.21 | 5.31 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 7 | 44 | 185 | 33 | 16 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 17.8% | 8.4% | 9.4% | 4.0% | 5.18 | 4.88 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 151 | 73 | 32 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.8% | 8.4% | 9.4% | 4.0% | 5.18 | 4.88 | +1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 131 | 77 | 425 | 1793 | 311 | 159 | 58 | 59% | 3.2 | 17.3% | 8.9% | 8.5% | 3.2% | 4.40 | 4.53 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 62 | 36 | 200 | 843 | 146 | 75 | 27 | 59% | 3.2 | 17.3% | 8.9% | 8.5% | 3.2% | 4.40 | 4.53 | +0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAArkansas Travelers · 96 IPFIP 4.91 → 5.89 (+0.98)K% 21.4% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.45% | — | ×0.810 | 17.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.98% | — | ×1.100 | 7.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.99% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 5.99% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.91 → 5.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 90 IPFIP 3.55 → 4.11 (+0.56)K% 15.5% → 12.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.55% | — | ×0.810 | 12.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.97% | — | ×1.100 | 7.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷0.958 | ×1.200 | 2.01% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 3.55 → 4.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAADurham Bulls · 12 IPFIP 5.51 → 5.61 (+0.10)K% 10.2% → 8.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 10.20% | — | ×0.860 | 8.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.16% | — | ×0.900 | 7.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.08% | ÷1.061 | ×1.100 | 4.23% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 5.51 → 5.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAReading Fightin Phils · 64 IPFIP 3.55 → 4.09 (+0.54)K% 19.0% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.98% | — | ×0.810 | 15.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.85% | — | ×1.100 | 10.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.46% | ÷1.050 | ×1.200 | 1.67% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 3.55 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAReading Fightin Phils · 75 IPFIP 4.35 → 5.20 (+0.85)K% 25.5% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.45% | — | ×0.810 | 20.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.48% | — | ×1.100 | 9.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.24% | ÷1.051 | ×1.200 | 4.85% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 4.35 → 5.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAReading Fightin Phils · 36 IPFIP 3.96 → 4.24 (+0.28)K% 22.8% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.78% | — | ×0.810 | 18.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.23% | — | ×1.100 | 9.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.16% | ÷1.344 | ×1.200 | 2.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 169).
Result: FIP 3.96 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 40 IPFIP 1.84 → 2.59 (+0.75)K% 29.1% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.11% | — | ×0.770 | 22.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.49% | — | ×1.150 | 10.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.004 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 1.84 → 2.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 9 IPFIP 5.39 → 6.15 (+0.75)K% 22.9% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.86% | — | ×0.880 | 20.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.57% | — | ×1.050 | 9.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.71% | ÷0.957 | ×1.100 | 6.57% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 5.39 → 6.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 58 | 17.7% | 8.2% | 1.54 | 5.16 |
| Ricky Stone ('07) | 1.3 | 64 | 15.2% | 8.0% | 1.55 | 4.68 |
| Jose Cabrera ('02) | 1.4 | 68 | 16.2% | 7.9% | 1.39 | 4.95 |
| Carlos Almánzar ('05) | 1.2 | 60 | 16.3% | 7.9% | 1.32 | 4.82 |
| Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 50 | 19.0%* | 8.4%* | 1.39* | 4.61* |
| Steve Kealey ('68-'73, -1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 54 | 18.5%* | 7.2%* | 1.32* | 5.26* |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |