Cam Alldred
P Indianapolis Indians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 2 | 67 | 4.01 | 3.31 | 21.9% | 8.7% | 1.0 | K 19.2% · BB 9.2% · FIP 3.70 | |
| 2023 | 27 | AAAPIT | 31 | 17 | 106 | 5.20 | 4.52 | 21.6% | 10.2% | — | K 18.6% · BB 9.1% · FIP 4.63 | |
| 2024 | 28 | AAAPIT | 9 | 9 | 34 | 6.88 | 3.84 | 21.8% | 11.5% | — | K 18.7% · BB 10.4% · FIP 4.11 | |
| 2025 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 31 | MLBPIT | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.52 | 4.52 | 21.4% | 9.6% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 32 | MLBPIT | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.63 | 4.72 | 21.2% | 10.0% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 22 | A MLE | West Virginia Power | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 2.75 | — |
| 2018 | 22 | A RAW | West Virginia Power | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 2.67 | — |
| 2019 | 23 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | 39 | 0 | 60 | 257 | 63 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.1% | 11.0% | 7.1% | 3.0% | 4.20 | 4.61 | — |
| 2019 | 23 | A RAW | Greensboro Grasshoppers | 39 | 0 | 60 | 257 | 63 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.5 | 24.5% | 9.3% | 15.2% | 2.3% | 4.20 | 3.50 | — |
| 2021 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 66 | 274 | 59 | 30 | 7 | 0% | 2.0 | 17.7% | 11.9% | 5.8% | 3.0% | 2.18 | 4.79 | — |
| 2021 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 66 | 274 | 59 | 30 | 7 | 0% | 2.0 | 21.5% | 10.9% | 10.6% | 2.6% | 2.18 | 4.05 | — |
| 2022 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 2 | 67 | 288 | 63 | 25 | 5 | 5% | 1.6 | 19.2% | 9.2% | 10.0% | 1.9% | 4.01 | 3.70 | +0.7 |
| 2022 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 2 | 67 | 288 | 63 | 25 | 5 | 5% | 1.6 | 21.9% | 8.7% | 13.2% | 1.7% | 4.01 | 3.31 | +1.0 |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 31 | 17 | 106 | 453 | 98 | 46 | 16 | 55% | 3.4 | 18.6% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 3.5% | 5.20 | 4.63 | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA RAW | Indianapolis Indians | 31 | 17 | 106 | 453 | 98 | 46 | 16 | 55% | 3.4 | 21.6% | 10.2% | 11.5% | 3.5% | 5.20 | 4.52 | — |
| 2024 | 28 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 9 | 9 | 34 | 156 | 34 | 18 | 3 | 100% | 3.8 | 18.7% | 10.4% | 8.4% | 2.3% | 6.88 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 28 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 9 | 9 | 34 | 156 | 34 | 18 | 3 | 100% | 3.8 | 18.7% | 10.4% | 8.4% | 2.3% | 6.88 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 28 | AAA RAW | Indianapolis Indians | 9 | 9 | 34 | 156 | 34 | 18 | 3 | 100% | 3.8 | 21.8% | 11.5% | 10.3% | 1.9% | 6.88 | 3.84 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.10 | +0.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 31 | MLB | PIT | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 9.6% | 11.8% | 3.0% | 4.52 | 4.52 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 32 | MLB MLE | PIT | 17 | 0 | 18 | 74 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.2% | 4.63 | 4.72 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 32 | MLB CTX | PIT | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.2% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 3.2% | 4.63 | 4.72 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 31 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.7% | 8.7% | 13.0% | 2.8% | 4.01 | 3.91 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 192 | 0 | 200 | 838 | 187 | 80 | 27 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.7% | 8.7% | 13.0% | 2.8% | 4.01 | 3.91 | +1.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 157 | 28 | 335 | 1440 | 266 | 146 | 41 | 18% | 2.1 | 18.5% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 2.9% | 4.35 | 4.40 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 94 | 17 | 200 | 859 | 159 | 87 | 25 | 18% | 2.1 | 18.5% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 2.9% | 4.35 | 4.40 | +0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 34 IPFIP 3.78 → 4.11 (+0.33)K% 21.8% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.79% | — | ×0.860 | 18.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.54% | — | ×0.900 | 10.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.92% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 2.33% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.78 → 4.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 106 IPFIP 4.50 → 4.63 (+0.14)K% 21.6% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.63% | — | ×0.860 | 18.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.15% | — | ×0.900 | 9.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.53% | ÷1.095 | ×1.100 | 3.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 4.50 → 4.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 66 IPFIP 3.34 → 3.70 (+0.36)K% 21.8% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.83% | — | ×0.880 | 19.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.80% | — | ×1.050 | 9.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.76% | ÷1.013 | ×1.100 | 1.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.34 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAAltoona Curve · 53 IPFIP 3.79 → 4.61 (+0.82)K% 22.3% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.27% | — | ×0.810 | 18.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.45% | — | ×1.100 | 11.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷0.947 | ×1.200 | 2.88% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 3.79 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 13 IPFIP 5.21 → 5.49 (+0.28)K% 18.5% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.52% | — | ×0.880 | 16.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.96% | — | ×1.050 | 13.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.70% | ÷1.096 | ×1.100 | 3.72% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 5.21 → 5.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 60 IPFIP 3.49 → 4.61 (+1.12)K% 24.5% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.51% | — | ×0.740 | 18.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.34% | — | ×1.180 | 11.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷1.009 | ×1.300 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 3.49 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).