Max Alba
P Erie SeaWolves| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | A+DET | 39 | 3 | 57 | 3.61 | 3.13 | 27.5% | 3.5% | — | K 21.2% · BB 4.0% · FIP 4.52 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 20 | 104 | 4.66 | 3.95 | 20.4% | 6.6% | — | K 15.9% · BB 7.4% · FIP 5.05 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 24 | 96 | 6.40 | 5.09 | 18.6% | 7.0% | — | K 14.7% · BB 8.2% · FIP 6.09 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBDET | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.47 | 5.47 | 14.3% | 7.9% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBDET | 15 | 0 | 16 | 5.43 | 5.49 | 15.0% | 8.3% | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 30 | MLBDET | 20 | 0 | 21 | 5.48 | 5.58 | 15.3% | 8.7% | -0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.8 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 10.80 | 3.10 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.8 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 10.80 | 3.10 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 41 | 0 | 55 | 234 | 65 | 25 | 6 | 0% | 1.3 | 20.6% | 12.6% | 7.9% | 2.7% | 4.07 | 4.47 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 41 | 0 | 55 | 234 | 65 | 25 | 6 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.8% | 10.7% | 17.1% | 2.6% | 4.07 | 3.52 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | 39 | 3 | 57 | 229 | 63 | 8 | 8 | 8% | 1.5 | 21.2% | 4.0% | 17.2% | 4.9% | 3.61 | 4.52 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | 39 | 3 | 57 | 229 | 63 | 8 | 8 | 8% | 1.5 | 21.2% | 4.0% | 17.2% | 4.9% | 3.61 | 4.52 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | 39 | 3 | 57 | 229 | 63 | 8 | 8 | 8% | 1.5 | 27.5% | 3.5% | 24.0% | 3.5% | 3.61 | 3.13 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 104 | 442 | 90 | 29 | 14 | 77% | 4.0 | 15.9% | 7.4% | 8.5% | 4.3% | 4.66 | 5.05 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 104 | 442 | 90 | 29 | 14 | 77% | 4.0 | 15.9% | 7.4% | 8.5% | 4.3% | 4.66 | 5.05 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 104 | 442 | 90 | 29 | 14 | 77% | 4.0 | 20.4% | 6.6% | 13.8% | 3.2% | 4.66 | 3.95 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 96 | 431 | 80 | 30 | 20 | 100% | 4.0 | 14.7% | 8.2% | 6.5% | 5.8% | 6.40 | 6.09 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 96 | 431 | 80 | 30 | 20 | 100% | 4.0 | 14.7% | 8.2% | 6.5% | 5.8% | 6.40 | 6.09 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 96 | 431 | 80 | 30 | 20 | 100% | 4.0 | 18.6% | 7.0% | 11.6% | 4.6% | 6.40 | 5.09 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | DET | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.3% | 7.9% | 6.4% | 4.0% | 5.47 | 5.47 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 48 | 0 | 51 | 214 | 32 | 18 | 9 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.0% | 8.3% | 6.7% | 4.0% | 5.43 | 5.49 | -0.5 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 40 | 0 | 42 | 176 | 27 | 15 | 7 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.3% | 8.7% | 6.6% | 4.2% | 5.48 | 5.58 | -0.5 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 15 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.0% | 8.3% | 6.7% | 4.0% | 5.43 | 5.49 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 20 | 0 | 21 | 89 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.3% | 8.7% | 6.6% | 4.2% | 5.48 | 5.58 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 35 | 0 | 37 | 157 | 24 | 13 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.2% | 8.5% | 6.6% | 4.1% | 5.46 | 5.16 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 129 | 70 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.2% | 8.5% | 6.6% | 4.1% | 5.46 | 5.16 | -1.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 132 | 47 | 314 | 1345 | 233 | 109 | 62 | 36% | 2.4 | 17.3% | 8.1% | 9.3% | 4.6% | 4.92 | 5.18 | -1.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 84 | 30 | 200 | 856 | 148 | 69 | 39 | 36% | 2.4 | 17.3% | 8.1% | 9.3% | 4.6% | 4.92 | 5.18 | -2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAErie SeaWolves · 86 IPFIP 5.17 → 6.09 (+0.92)K% 18.2% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.16% | — | ×0.810 | 14.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.42% | — | ×1.100 | 8.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.86% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 5.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.17 → 6.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 6 IPFIP 3.94 → 4.95 (+1.01)K% 16.0% → 11.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.00% | — | ×0.740 | 11.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.180 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 5.20% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.94 → 4.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 72 IPFIP 3.74 → 5.09 (+1.35)K% 22.3% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.30% | — | ×0.770 | 17.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.76% | — | ×1.150 | 7.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.04% | ÷0.850 | ×1.250 | 4.47% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 70).
Result: FIP 3.74 → 5.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAErie SeaWolves · 32 IPFIP 4.37 → 4.97 (+0.60)K% 16.4% → 13.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.44% | — | ×0.810 | 13.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.16% | — | ×1.100 | 6.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.42% | ÷1.056 | ×1.200 | 3.89% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 57 IPFIP 3.14 → 4.52 (+1.38)K% 27.5% → 21.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.51% | — | ×0.770 | 21.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.49% | — | ×1.150 | 4.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.49% | ÷0.889 | ×1.250 | 4.91% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 3.14 → 4.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 55 IPFIP 3.52 → 4.47 (+0.95)K% 27.8% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.78% | — | ×0.740 | 20.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.68% | — | ×1.180 | 12.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.216 | ×1.300 | 2.74% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 3.52 → 4.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.8 | 54 | 14.8% | 8.2% | 1.57 | 5.46 |
| Ricky Stone ('07) | 1.3 | 64 | 15.2% | 8.0% | 1.55 | 4.68 |
| Jose Cabrera ('02) | 1.4 | 68 | 16.2% | 7.9% | 1.39 | 4.95 |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |
| Carlos Almánzar ('05) | 1.2 | 60 | 16.3% | 7.9% | 1.32 | 4.82 |
| Steve Kealey ('68-'73, -1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 54 | 18.5%* | 7.2%* | 1.32* | 5.26* |
| Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 50 | 19.0%* | 8.4%* | 1.39* | 4.61* |