Jayden Murray
P Iowa Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27 | ROKHOU | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3.00 | 4.10 | 38.5% | 0.0% | — | K 38.5% · BB 0.0% · FIP 4.07 |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 59 | 1 | 76 | 4.16 | 3.31 | 22.8% | 10.2% | 1.1 | K 20.5% · BB 9.7% · FIP 3.74 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 0 | 60 | 5.07 | 3.98 | 24.4% | 13.2% | 0.4 | K 21.8% · BB 12.2% · FIP 4.13 |
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBCHC | 89 | 0 | 93 | 4.51 | 4.61 | 21.5% | 11.4% | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ79% MLB | 31 | MLBCHC | 72 | 0 | 76 | 4.67 | 4.80 | 20.8% | 11.4% | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ84% MLB | 32 | MLBCHC | 62 | 0 | 65 | 4.86 | 5.01 | 20.1% | 11.5% | -0.3 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 96 | 363 | 96 | 17 | 11 | 100% | 4.8 | 20.8% | 5.3% | 15.5% | 3.9% | 2.16 | 4.14 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 96 | 363 | 96 | 17 | 11 | 100% | 4.8 | 26.4% | 4.7% | 21.8% | 3.0% | 2.16 | 3.12 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 22 | 108 | 457 | 99 | 34 | 13 | 96% | 4.7 | 16.9% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 3.2% | 3.50 | 4.50 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 22 | 108 | 457 | 99 | 34 | 13 | 96% | 4.7 | 21.7% | 7.4% | 14.2% | 2.8% | 3.50 | 3.78 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AAA MLE | Sugar Land Space Cowboys | 11 | 8 | 41 | 212 | 42 | 32 | 8 | 73% | 3.8 | 17.0% | 13.6% | 3.5% | 4.6% | 8.27 | 5.92 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AAA RAW | Sugar Land Space Cowboys | 11 | 8 | 41 | 212 | 42 | 32 | 8 | 73% | 3.8 | 19.8% | 15.1% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 8.27 | 5.91 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 1.5 | 38.5% | 0.0% | 38.5% | 7.7% | 3.00 | 4.07 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 1.5 | 38.5% | 0.0% | 38.5% | 7.7% | 3.00 | 4.07 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | ROK RAW | FCL Astros | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 1.5 | 38.5% | 0.0% | 38.5% | 7.7% | 3.00 | 4.10 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 59 | 1 | 76 | 324 | 74 | 33 | 5 | 2% | 1.3 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.7% | 2.1% | 4.16 | 3.74 | +0.7 |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 59 | 1 | 76 | 324 | 74 | 33 | 5 | 2% | 1.3 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.7% | 2.1% | 4.16 | 3.74 | +0.7 |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 59 | 1 | 76 | 324 | 74 | 33 | 5 | 2% | 1.3 | 22.8% | 10.2% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 4.16 | 3.31 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 35 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 21.8% | 12.2% | 9.6% | 2.4% | 5.07 | 4.13 | +0.3 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 35 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 21.8% | 12.2% | 9.6% | 2.4% | 5.07 | 4.13 | +0.3 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 35 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 24.4% | 13.2% | 11.3% | 2.3% | 5.07 | 3.98 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 19 | 1 | 28 | 126 | 22 | 12 | 3 | 5% | 1.5 | 17.5% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 6.11 | 4.21 | +0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | CHC | 89 | 0 | 93 | 393 | 84 | 45 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.5% | 11.4% | 10.1% | 2.7% | 4.51 | 4.61 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | CHC | 90 | 0 | 95 | 401 | 83 | 46 | 12 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 11.4% | 9.4% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.80 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB MLE | CHC | 73 | 0 | 77 | 324 | 65 | 37 | 10 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.1% | 11.5% | 8.6% | 3.2% | 4.86 | 5.01 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | CHC | 72 | 0 | 76 | 321 | 67 | 37 | 10 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 11.4% | 9.4% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.80 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB CTX | CHC | 62 | 0 | 65 | 274 | 55 | 32 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 11.5% | 8.6% | 3.2% | 4.86 | 5.01 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 153 | 1 | 168 | 718 | 143 | 80 | 21 | 1% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 3.0% | 4.98 | 4.45 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 181 | 1 | 200 | 854 | 170 | 95 | 25 | 1% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 3.0% | 4.98 | 4.45 | +0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 158 | 53 | 384 | 1635 | 318 | 151 | 53 | 34% | 2.4 | 19.5% | 9.2% | 10.2% | 3.2% | 4.05 | 4.39 | -0.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 82 | 28 | 200 | 851 | 166 | 79 | 27 | 34% | 2.4 | 19.5% | 9.2% | 10.2% | 3.2% | 4.05 | 4.39 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAIowa Cubs · 44 IPFIP 3.44 → 3.67 (+0.23)K% 27.3% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.860 | 23.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.90% | — | ×0.900 | 12.51% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.60% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.76% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.44 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASugar Land Space Cowboys · 64 IPFIP 3.45 → 3.74 (+0.29)K% 23.8% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.83% | — | ×0.860 | 20.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.83% | — | ×0.900 | 9.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.81% | ÷0.961 | ×1.100 | 2.07% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 3.45 → 3.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASugar Land Space Cowboys · 41 IPFIP 5.41 → 5.92 (+0.51)K% 19.8% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.81% | — | ×0.860 | 17.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.09% | — | ×0.900 | 13.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.77% | ÷0.896 | ×1.100 | 4.63% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 79).
Result: FIP 5.41 → 5.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AACorpus Christi Hooks · 104 IPFIP 3.84 → 4.50 (+0.67)K% 20.9% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.87% | — | ×0.810 | 16.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.80% | — | ×1.100 | 8.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.75% | ÷1.040 | ×1.200 | 3.18% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.84 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAADurham Bulls · 4 IPFIP 2.50 → 3.05 (+0.55)K% 38.1% → 33.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.10% | — | ×0.880 | 33.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.76% | ÷1.034 | ×1.100 | 5.07% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 2.50 → 3.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 58 IPFIP 2.89 → 3.80 (+0.91)K% 24.3% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.31% | — | ×0.770 | 18.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.59% | — | ×1.150 | 5.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.29% | ÷0.978 | ×1.250 | 2.93% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 2.89 → 3.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 38 IPFIP 3.48 → 4.65 (+1.17)K% 29.7% → 24.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.66% | — | ×0.810 | 24.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.83% | — | ×1.100 | 5.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.14% | ÷0.938 | ×1.200 | 5.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 3.48 → 4.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.6 | 109 | 20.6% | 11.3% | 1.12 | 4.77 |
| Frank Reberger ('68-'72, -1 WAR*) | 1.9 | 97 | 19.1%* | 10.9%* | 1.08* | 5.19* |
| Mike Kilkenny ('69-'73, 0 WAR*) | 2.0 | 102 | 22.2%* | 11.4%* | 1.11* | 5.16* |
| Butch Metzger ('74-'78, 0 WAR*) | 1.5 | 98 | 19.8%* | 10.7%* | 1.09* | 4.50* |
| Junior Guerra ('21) | 2.5 | 85 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 1.17 | 4.06 |
| Jake Faria ('23) | 1.0 | 68 | 20.9% | 10.3% | 1.32 | 4.87 |
| Brian Tallet ('11) | 2.3 | 92 | 16.5% | 10.4% | 1.13 | 4.79 |