Ben Harris

P Oklahoma City Comets

Age 27 LHP 6'1" / 195 lbs AAA

Overview

AAAPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%10%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	23	AALAD	46	0	52	4.88	3.97	31.4%	19.9%	—	K 25.4% · BB 21.9% · FIP 4.76
2024	24	MIX2 levels	42	0	48	5.44	4.97	29.4%	19.5%	—	K 23.8% · BB 19.6% · FIP 5.66
2025	25	AAALAD	28	2	30	4.75	4.85	24.5%	22.4%	—	K 21.1% · BB 20.2% · FIP 4.74
2027PROJ	27	MLBLAD	19	0	20	5.29	5.29	22.1%	16.7%	-0.2
2028PROJ43% MLB	28	MLBLAD	9	0	9	5.24	5.28	22.1%	16.1%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsNick Hagadone (age 27) · Matt Thornton (age 27) · Brian Moran (age 26)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 117126vR 134

ERA5.29

FIP5.29

K%22.1%

BB%16.7%

K-BB%5.4%

Proj IP20

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 20 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	21	MIX MLE	2 levels	6	0	5	31	9	6	1	0%	0.9	29.0%	19.4%	9.7%	3.2%	6.75	4.87	—
2021	21	MIX RAW	2 levels	6	0	5	31	9	6	1	0%	0.9	29.0%	19.4%	9.7%	3.2%	6.75	5.54	—
2022	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	44	3	56	238	107	37	2	7%	1.3	33.9%	18.2%	15.7%	1.0%	3.72	3.06	—
2022	22	MIX RAW	2 levels	44	3	56	238	107	37	2	7%	1.3	45.0%	15.5%	29.4%	0.8%	3.72	1.72	—
2023	23	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	46	0	52	236	74	47	4	0%	1.1	25.4%	21.9%	3.5%	1.9%	4.88	4.76	—
2023	23	AA RAW	Tulsa Drillers	46	0	52	236	74	47	4	0%	1.1	31.4%	19.9%	11.4%	1.7%	4.88	3.97	—
2024	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	42	0	48	221	65	43	7	0%	1.1	23.8%	19.6%	4.2%	3.8%	5.44	5.66	—
2024	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	42	0	48	221	65	43	7	0%	1.1	23.8%	19.6%	4.2%	3.8%	5.44	5.66	—
2024	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	42	0	48	221	65	43	7	0%	1.1	29.4%	19.5%	10.0%	3.2%	5.44	4.97	—
2025	25	AAA MLE	Oklahoma City Comets	28	2	30	147	36	33	2	7%	1.1	21.1%	20.2%	0.9%	1.6%	4.75	4.74	—
2025	25	AAA MLE	Oklahoma City Comets	28	2	30	147	36	33	2	7%	1.1	21.1%	20.2%	0.9%	1.6%	4.75	4.74	—
2025	25	AAA RAW	Oklahoma City Comets	28	2	30	147	36	33	2	7%	1.1	24.5%	22.4%	2.0%	1.4%	4.75	4.85	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	27	MLB	LAD	19	0	20	84	19	14	2	0%	1.1	22.1%	16.7%	5.4%	2.9%	5.29	5.29	-0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	28	MLB MLE	LAD	19	0	20	84	19	14	3	0%	1.1	22.1%	16.1%	6.0%	3.0%	5.24	5.28	-0.2
2028	28	MLB CTX	LAD	9	0	9	38	8	6	1	0%	1.0	22.1%	16.1%	6.0%	3.0%	5.24	5.28	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		8	0	9	36	8	6	1	0%	1.1	22.1%	16.1%	6.0%	3.0%	5.24	4.90	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	188	141	24	0%	1.1	22.1%	16.1%	6.0%	3.0%	5.24	4.90	-0.8
Career	—	MLE		166	5	191	873	233	174	18	3%	1.2	26.7%	19.9%	6.8%	2.1%	4.71	4.53	-0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		174	5	200	914	244	182	19	3%	1.2	26.7%	19.9%	6.8%	2.1%	4.71	4.53	-1.7

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Ben Harris (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.29	22.1%	16.7%	2.9%	—	5.28	22.1%	6.0%	20	-0.01	—	—	—
Nick Hagadone L 2013 · 4.75 FIP	27	SU	4.75	22.6%	15.0%	3.0%	.253	3.34	25.9%	19.0%	51	-1.41	2.97	141	87
Matt Thornton L 2004 · 4.18 FIP	27	SU	4.18	20.3%	16.2%	1.4%	.304	4.18	21.8%	11.5%	167	-0.00	1.71	663	84
Brian Moran L 2015 · 4.50 FIP	26	SU	4.50	17.7%	14.1%	2.0%	.318	2.74	25.0%	17.4%	80	-1.76	1.80	421	83
Juan Pablo Perez L 2007 · 5.32 FIP	28	SU	5.32	17.5%	14.0%	3.5%	.324	—	—	—	—	—	1.75	104	82
Trey Jeans L 2022 · 5.09 FIP	26	SU	5.09	22.3%	16.5%	3.3%	.291	—	—	—	—	—	2.74	111	82
John Bale L 2001 · 4.41 FIP	27	SU	4.41	18.6%	15.0%	1.8%	.219	4.12	19.0%	13.9%	46	-0.29	2.49	168	80
Stephen Randolph L 2003 · 4.83 FIP	29	SU	4.83	18.5%	14.8%	2.6%	.247	5.69	15.8%	-3.0%	82	+0.86	4.83	155	80
Hunter Cervenka L 2017 · 5.91 FIP	27	SU	5.91	18.9%	15.0%	4.6%	.282	3.10	25.9%	15.0%	81	-2.81	3.08	194	79
C.J. Widger L 2024 · 4.21 FIP	25	SU	4.21	26.0%	16.0%	2.3%	.258	5.75	18.1%	-0.7%	57	+1.54	3.83	105	79
Nick Lee L 2016 · 4.96 FIP	25	SU	4.96	19.0%	19.7%	1.8%	.286	—	—	—	—	—	3.77	102	78
Brian Marconi L 2022 · 5.02 FIP	25	SU	5.02	20.3%	18.2%	2.4%	.329	—	—	—	—	—	3.89	101	78
Graeme Stinson L 2023 · 4.85 FIP	25	SU	4.85	19.5%	15.6%	2.6%	.302	—	—	—	—	—	3.56	146	77
Trey Cumbie L 2022 · 5.07 FIP	26	SU	5.07	23.3%	16.1%	3.4%	.215	—	—	—	—	—	3.44	152	77
Mitchell Tyranski L 2024 · 4.90 FIP	26	SU	4.90	21.0%	12.3%	3.7%	.234	3.46	20.5%	4.0%	57	-1.44	3.46	145	77
Andrew Mitchell L 2022 · 6.04 FIP	27	SU	6.04	18.2%	17.0%	4.2%	.317	—	—	—	—	—	2.51	119	77
Ty Madrigal L 2022 · 5.75 FIP	25	SU	5.75	17.6%	15.2%	4.0%	.304	—	—	—	—	—	4.56	107	77
Alex Torres L 2015 · 5.38 FIP	27	SU	5.38	22.7%	16.2%	3.9%	.227	4.20	18.5%	-0.1%	38	-1.18	2.10	184	75
David Rollins L 2017 · 5.58 FIP	27	SU	5.58	18.0%	12.1%	4.5%	.260	5.68	15.9%	12.5%	20	+0.10	3.59	132	74
Mike Gosling L 2007 · 4.67 FIP	26	SU	4.67	19.5%	12.2%	3.0%	.346	5.66	11.4%	2.6%	25	+0.99	4.44	116	74
Mike Zagurski L 2012 · 4.48 FIP	29	SU	4.48	20.9%	11.7%	3.0%	.305	—	—	—	—	—	2.94	120	74