Bryan Pope
P Everett AquaSox| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 23 | ASTL | 26 | 7 | 61 | 3.96 | 3.39 | 18.7% | 5.1% | — | K 13.8% · BB 6.1% · FIP 4.48 | |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 39 | 0 | 64 | 3.08 | 3.26 | 24.6% | 8.5% | — | K 19.4% · BB 9.5% · FIP 3.96 | |
| 2024 | 25 | A+SEA | 20 | 0 | 22 | 7.36 | 4.92 | 16.5% | 11.3% | — | K 12.7% · BB 13.0% · FIP 5.20 | |
| 2025 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBSEA | — | — | 0 | 4.62 | 4.62 | 21.4% | 10.3% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBSEA | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.67 | 4.72 | 21.4% | 10.4% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | 7 | 0 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.7% | 2.6% | 21.1% | 2.6% | 1.04 | 2.88 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Cardinals | 7 | 0 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.7% | 2.6% | 21.1% | 2.6% | 1.04 | 2.87 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | 26 | 7 | 61 | 273 | 51 | 14 | 6 | 27% | 2.4 | 13.8% | 6.1% | 7.8% | 3.2% | 3.96 | 4.48 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | 26 | 7 | 61 | 273 | 51 | 14 | 6 | 27% | 2.4 | 18.7% | 5.1% | 13.6% | 2.2% | 3.96 | 3.39 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 64 | 284 | 70 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.6 | 19.4% | 9.5% | 10.0% | 2.4% | 3.08 | 3.96 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 64 | 284 | 70 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.6 | 24.6% | 8.5% | 16.2% | 2.1% | 3.08 | 3.26 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | Everett AquaSox | 20 | 0 | 22 | 115 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 12.7% | 13.0% | -0.3% | 2.8% | 7.36 | 5.20 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | Everett AquaSox | 20 | 0 | 22 | 115 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 12.7% | 13.0% | -0.3% | 2.8% | 7.36 | 5.20 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ RAW | Everett AquaSox | 20 | 0 | 22 | 115 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.5% | 11.3% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 7.36 | 4.92 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | SEA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.4% | 10.3% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.62 | 4.62 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | SEA | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 10.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.72 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | SEA | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 10.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.72 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 10.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.34 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 191 | 76 | 38 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 10.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.34 | +0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 92 | 7 | 156 | 710 | 117 | 59 | 20 | 8% | 1.7 | 16.4% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 2.8% | 3.91 | 4.30 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 118 | 9 | 200 | 908 | 149 | 76 | 25 | 8% | 1.7 | 16.4% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 2.8% | 3.91 | 4.30 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Everett AquaSox · 22 IPFIP 4.57 → 5.20 (+0.63)K% 16.5% → 12.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.52% | — | ×0.770 | 12.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.30% | — | ×1.150 | 13.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.61% | ÷1.175 | ×1.250 | 2.77% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 135).
Result: FIP 4.57 → 5.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AASpringfield Cardinals · 32 IPFIP 3.92 → 4.52 (+0.60)K% 20.6% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.65% | — | ×0.810 | 16.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.03% | — | ×1.100 | 9.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.58% | ÷1.080 | ×1.200 | 2.87% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 3.92 → 4.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Peoria Chiefs · 32 IPFIP 2.45 → 3.29 (+0.84)K% 29.5% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.46% | — | ×0.770 | 22.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.75% | — | ×1.150 | 8.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.55% | ÷1.093 | ×1.250 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 2.45 → 3.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 APalm Beach Cardinals · 61 IPFIP 3.38 → 4.48 (+1.10)K% 18.7% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.68% | — | ×0.740 | 13.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.13% | — | ×1.180 | 6.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.20% | ÷0.880 | ×1.300 | 3.24% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 3.38 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Cardinals · 9 IPFIP 2.88 → 4.18 (+1.30)K% 23.7% → 16.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.68% | — | ×0.680 | 16.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.63% | — | ×1.250 | 3.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 3.68% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.88 → 4.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).