John Doxakis
P Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 25 | 116 | 4.89 | 4.20 | 22.9% | 10.7% | — | K 18.2% · BB 11.9% · FIP 5.12 | |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 36 | 0 | 84 | 5.89 | 4.34 | 22.0% | 11.3% | — | K 18.2% · BB 12.2% · FIP 4.58 | |
| 2024 | 25 | AAACLE | 20 | 0 | 31 | 7.26 | 5.55 | 19.4% | 18.1% | — | K 16.6% · BB 16.3% · FIP 5.22 | |
| 2025 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBCLE | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.86 | 4.86 | 20.6% | 11.7% | -0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 29 | MLBCLE | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.89 | 4.94 | 20.6% | 11.7% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 21 | 103 | 412 | 114 | 19 | 7 | 91% | 4.5 | 21.0% | 5.3% | 15.7% | 2.2% | 3.94 | 3.19 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 21 | 103 | 412 | 114 | 19 | 7 | 91% | 4.5 | 27.7% | 4.6% | 23.1% | 1.7% | 3.94 | 2.32 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 25 | 116 | 494 | 113 | 53 | 15 | 93% | 4.3 | 18.2% | 11.9% | 6.3% | 3.7% | 4.89 | 5.12 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 25 | 116 | 494 | 113 | 53 | 15 | 93% | 4.3 | 22.9% | 10.7% | 12.1% | 3.0% | 4.89 | 4.20 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 84 | 382 | 84 | 43 | 11 | 0% | 2.3 | 18.2% | 12.2% | 6.0% | 2.7% | 5.89 | 4.58 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 84 | 382 | 84 | 43 | 11 | 0% | 2.3 | 22.0% | 11.3% | 10.7% | 2.9% | 5.89 | 4.34 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 20 | 0 | 31 | 155 | 30 | 28 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 16.6% | 16.3% | 0.4% | 2.7% | 7.26 | 5.22 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 20 | 0 | 31 | 155 | 30 | 28 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 16.6% | 16.3% | 0.4% | 2.7% | 7.26 | 5.22 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 20 | 0 | 31 | 155 | 30 | 28 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 19.4% | 18.1% | 1.3% | 2.6% | 7.26 | 5.55 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | CLE | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 11.7% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 4.86 | 4.86 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 16 | 0 | 16 | 70 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 11.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.94 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 11.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.94 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 11.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.56 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 165 | 99 | 33 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.6% | 11.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.56 | -0.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 106 | 46 | 334 | 1443 | 272 | 152 | 42 | 43% | 3.1 | 18.8% | 10.6% | 8.3% | 2.9% | 5.07 | 4.44 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 64 | 28 | 200 | 865 | 163 | 91 | 25 | 43% | 3.1 | 18.8% | 10.6% | 8.3% | 2.9% | 5.07 | 4.44 | -0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 31 IPFIP 5.17 → 5.22 (+0.05)K% 19.4% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.35% | — | ×0.860 | 16.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.06% | — | ×0.900 | 16.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.58% | ÷1.060 | ×1.100 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 5.17 → 5.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 82 IPFIP 3.94 → 4.58 (+0.64)K% 22.4% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.43% | — | ×0.810 | 18.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.08% | — | ×1.100 | 12.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.43% | ÷1.087 | ×1.200 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 3.94 → 4.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 82 IPFIP 4.65 → 5.51 (+0.86)K% 19.7% → 16.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.73% | — | ×0.810 | 15.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.33% | — | ×1.100 | 13.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.01% | ÷0.970 | ×1.200 | 3.73% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 4.65 → 5.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 34 IPFIP 2.90 → 4.02 (+1.12)K% 31.8% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.78% | — | ×0.770 | 24.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.20% | — | ×1.150 | 7.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.10% | ÷1.020 | ×1.250 | 3.80% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 2.90 → 4.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 73 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.72 (+0.87)K% 23.8% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.84% | — | ×0.770 | 18.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.30% | — | ×1.150 | 6.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.99% | ÷0.978 | ×1.250 | 2.54% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ACharleston RiverDogs · 30 IPFIP 0.72 → 1.75 (+1.03)K% 38.2% → 28.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.18% | — | ×0.740 | 28.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.73% | — | ×1.180 | 3.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.91% | ÷1.026 | ×1.300 | 1.15% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 0.72 → 1.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).