Hagen Danner
P Salt Lake Bees| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 34 | 0 | 35 | 3.06 | 3.64 | 24.2% | 8.7% | — | K 20.0% · BB 8.0% · FIP 4.09 |
| 2025 | 26 | AAASEA | 54 | 0 | 56 | 5.59 | 4.32 | 21.4% | 7.9% | — | K 18.4% · BB 7.1% · FIP 4.24 |
| 2026 | 27 | AAALAA | 37 | 0 | 40 | 6.35 | 4.54 | 22.1% | 15.6% | — | K 19.0% · BB 14.0% · FIP 4.48 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBLAA | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 19.3% | 10.9% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 29 | MLBLAA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.86 | 4.91 | 19.5% | 10.9% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | 25 | 0 | 36 | 143 | 42 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.6% | 9.7% | 13.0% | 1.9% | 2.02 | 3.47 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A+ RAW | Vancouver Canadians | 25 | 0 | 36 | 143 | 42 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 29.4% | 8.4% | 21.0% | 1.4% | 2.02 | 2.48 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 4 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 5.3% | 10.5% | -5.3% | 0.0% | 4.91 | 3.99 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | New Hampshire Fisher Cats | 4 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 5.3% | 10.5% | -5.3% | 0.0% | 4.91 | 4.19 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 34 | 1 | 40 | 158 | 56 | 11 | 8 | 3% | 1.2 | 27.1% | 5.7% | 21.4% | 8.7% | 3.63 | 6.28 | -0.8 |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 34 | 1 | 40 | 158 | 56 | 11 | 8 | 3% | 1.2 | 35.4% | 7.0% | 28.5% | 5.1% | 3.63 | 3.73 | +0.4 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 35 | 149 | 36 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 8.0% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 3.06 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 35 | 149 | 36 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.0% | 8.0% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 3.06 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 35 | 149 | 36 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | 2.7% | 3.06 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AAA MLE | Tacoma Rainiers | 54 | 0 | 56 | 252 | 54 | 20 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.4% | 7.1% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 5.59 | 4.24 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AAA MLE | Tacoma Rainiers | 54 | 0 | 56 | 252 | 54 | 20 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.4% | 7.1% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 5.59 | 4.24 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | AAA RAW | Tacoma Rainiers | 54 | 0 | 56 | 252 | 54 | 20 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 7.9% | 13.5% | 3.6% | 5.59 | 4.32 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 37 | 0 | 40 | 199 | 44 | 31 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.0% | 14.0% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 6.35 | 4.48 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 37 | 0 | 40 | 199 | 44 | 31 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.0% | 14.0% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 6.35 | 4.48 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AAA RAW | Salt Lake Bees | 37 | 0 | 40 | 199 | 44 | 31 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 15.6% | 6.5% | 2.0% | 6.35 | 4.54 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | +0.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | LAA | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.3% | 10.9% | 8.4% | 2.9% | 4.80 | 4.80 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 19 | 0 | 20 | 85 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.5% | 10.9% | 8.5% | 3.0% | 4.83 | 4.88 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.5% | 10.9% | 8.5% | 3.1% | 4.86 | 4.91 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 8 | 0 | 8 | 32 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.9% | 10.6% | 8.2% | 3.0% | 4.65 | 4.49 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 208 | 0 | 200 | 834 | 155 | 78 | 26 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.9% | 10.6% | 8.2% | 3.0% | 4.65 | 4.49 | +0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 188 | 1 | 210 | 920 | 190 | 83 | 34 | 1% | 1.1 | 20.7% | 9.0% | 11.7% | 3.6% | 4.32 | 4.49 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 179 | 1 | 200 | 875 | 181 | 79 | 32 | 1% | 1.1 | 20.7% | 9.0% | 11.7% | 3.6% | 4.32 | 4.49 | -0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASalt Lake Bees · 40 IPFIP 4.31 → 4.48 (+0.17)K% 22.1% → 19.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.11% | — | ×0.860 | 19.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.58% | — | ×0.900 | 14.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.01% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.21% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.31 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAATacoma Rainiers · 56 IPFIP 4.26 → 4.24 (−0.02)K% 21.4% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.43% | — | ×0.860 | 18.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.94% | — | ×0.900 | 7.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷1.204 | ×1.100 | 3.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 141).
Result: FIP 4.26 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAABuffalo Bisons · 34 IPFIP 3.77 → 4.09 (+0.33)K% 23.3% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.29% | — | ×0.860 | 20.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.90% | — | ×0.900 | 8.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.74% | ÷0.990 | ×1.100 | 3.04% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 3.77 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 28 IPFIP 5.19 → 6.28 (+1.09)K% 31.5% → 27.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.53% | — | ×0.860 | 27.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.31% | — | ×0.900 | 5.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.21% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 8.65% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 5.19 → 6.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 9 IPFIP 0.13 → 0.90 (+0.76)K% 43.2% → 35.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 43.24% | — | ×0.810 | 35.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.41% | — | ×1.100 | 5.95% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 0.13 → 0.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Vancouver Canadians · 36 IPFIP 2.45 → 3.47 (+1.02)K% 29.4% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.37% | — | ×0.770 | 22.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.39% | — | ×1.150 | 9.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.40% | ÷0.909 | ×1.250 | 1.92% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 2.45 → 3.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).