Rodolfo Martinez

P Norfolk Tides

Age 33 RHP 6'2" / 200 lbs AAA

Overview

AAAPROSPECT

MLB%10%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2018	24	A+SF	45	55	5.76	4.42	18.0%	11.2%	—	K 13.8% · BB 12.9% · FIP 5.24
2019	25	MIX4 levels	34	47	4.56	2.70	24.1%	11.1%	—	K 17.0% · BB 12.4% · FIP 3.65
2025	31	MIX2 levels	25	28	4.82	3.92	22.3%	17.3%	—	K 18.5% · BB 17.2% · FIP 4.17
2027PROJ	33	MLBBAL	14	15	4.99	4.99	21.3%	13.9%	-0.1
2028PROJ6% MLB	34	MLBBAL	1	1	5.09	5.20	20.9%	14.0%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsLeo Rosales (age 34) · Miguel Mejia (age 31) · Jason Bulger (age 31)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 128120vR 112

ERA4.99

FIP4.99

K%21.3%

BB%13.9%

K-BB%7.4%

Proj IP15

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 15 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2015	21	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	35	0	46	194	44	14	1	0%	1.3	16.8%	8.5%	8.3%	0.7%	2.54	3.15	—
2015	21	A RAW	Augusta GreenJackets	35	0	46	194	44	14	1	0%	1.3	22.7%	7.2%	15.5%	0.5%	2.54	2.38	—
2016	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	57	0	54	236	50	24	2	0%	0.9	16.6%	11.4%	5.2%	1.0%	3.35	3.71	—
2016	22	MIX RAW	2 levels	57	0	54	236	50	24	2	0%	0.9	21.2%	10.2%	11.0%	0.8%	3.35	3.06	—
2017	23	MIX MLE	3 levels	20	0	23	104	19	5	2	0%	1.2	17.1%	2.1%	15.0%	4.6%	4.24	4.44	—
2017	23	MIX RAW	3 levels	20	0	23	104	19	5	2	0%	1.2	18.3%	4.8%	13.5%	1.9%	4.24	3.23	—
2018	24	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	45	0	55	267	48	30	6	0%	1.2	13.8%	12.9%	0.9%	3.0%	5.76	5.24	—
2018	24	A+ RAW	San Jose Giants	45	0	55	267	48	30	6	0%	1.2	18.0%	11.2%	6.7%	2.2%	5.76	4.42	—
2019	25	MIX MLE	4 levels	34	0	47	216	52	24	1	0%	1.4	17.0%	12.4%	4.6%	0.7%	4.56	3.65	—
2019	25	MIX RAW	4 levels	34	0	47	216	52	24	1	0%	1.4	24.1%	11.1%	13.0%	0.5%	4.56	2.70	—
2025	31	MIX MLE	2 levels	25	0	28	139	31	24	1	0%	1.1	18.5%	17.2%	1.4%	0.8%	4.82	4.17	—
2025	31	MIX MLE	2 levels	25	0	28	139	31	24	1	0%	1.1	18.5%	17.2%	1.4%	0.8%	4.82	4.17	—
2025	31	MIX RAW	2 levels	25	0	28	139	31	24	1	0%	1.1	22.3%	17.3%	5.0%	0.7%	4.82	3.92	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	33	MLB	BAL	14	0	15	63	13	9	2	0%	1.1	21.3%	13.9%	7.4%	2.8%	4.99	4.99	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	34	MLB MLE	BAL	19	0	20	84	18	12	3	0%	1.1	20.9%	14.0%	7.0%	3.1%	5.09	5.20	-0.1
2028	34	MLB CTX	BAL	1	0	1	4	1	1	0	0%	1.0	20.9%	14.0%	7.0%	3.1%	5.09	5.20	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		1	0	1	5	1	1	0	0%	1.1	20.9%	14.0%	7.0%	3.1%	5.09	4.82	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	182	182	0	0%	1.1	20.9%	14.0%	7.0%	3.1%	5.09	4.82	-0.6
Career	—	MLE		216	0	253	1156	189	131	19	0%	1.2	16.4%	11.3%	5.0%	1.7%	4.20	4.08	-0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		171	0	200	914	149	103	15	0%	1.2	16.4%	11.3%	5.0%	1.7%	4.20	4.08	-1.5

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Rodolfo Martinez (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.99	21.3%	13.9%	2.8%	—	5.20	20.9%	7.0%	20	+0.21	—	—	—
Leo Rosales R 2015 · 3.99 FIP	34	SU	3.99	18.1%	10.8%	1.9%	.261	4.24	7.8%	-0.4%	22	+0.25	3.85	130	80
Miguel Mejia R 2019 · 4.41 FIP	31	SU	4.41	15.7%	10.7%	2.3%	.341	—	—	—	—	—	3.37	108	78
Jason Bulger R 2010 · 4.36 FIP	31	SU	4.36	22.5%	13.5%	2.6%	.324	—	—	—	—	—	3.78	106	75
Keiichi Yabu R 2005 · 4.05 FIP	36	SU	4.05	16.8%	8.8%	2.3%	.307	3.48	15.9%	6.6%	68	-0.57	3.48	126	74
Steve Delabar R 2016 · 4.62 FIP	33	SU	4.62	20.4%	15.6%	2.3%	.308	—	—	—	—	—	2.43	229	73
Jon Edwards R 2019 · 4.43 FIP	31	SU	4.43	25.1%	11.6%	3.6%	.290	—	—	—	—	—	2.40	132	72
Jean Machi R 2015 · 4.56 FIP	33	SU	4.56	16.3%	8.6%	3.2%	.276	4.24	18.5%	11.9%	128	-0.32	2.16	306	71
Matt Bush R 2018 · 4.72 FIP	32	SU	4.72	17.6%	13.0%	2.7%	.278	—	—	—	—	—	2.87	249	70
Hirokazu Sawamura R 2021 · 4.48 FIP	33	SU	4.48	26.2%	11.2%	4.0%	.263	4.02	18.1%	6.8%	51	-0.46	4.02	104	70
Mike James R 2001 · 4.52 FIP	33	SU	4.52	15.0%	8.7%	2.9%	.299	4.84	19.6%	9.8%	11	+0.32	2.87	314	70
Ryan Brasier R 2021 · 4.85 FIP	33	SU	4.85	18.0%	8.0%	4.1%	.286	3.16	23.7%	17.9%	150	-1.69	2.31	426	70
Mark Serrano R 2019 · 5.25 FIP	33	SU	5.25	20.2%	7.9%	5.2%	.289	—	—	—	—	—	3.16	120	69
Mike Buddie R 2002 · 4.26 FIP	31	SU	4.26	15.1%	7.6%	2.7%	.297	—	—	—	—	—	3.76	123	69
Jake Sanchez R 2023 · 4.70 FIP	33	SU	4.70	20.3%	10.6%	3.6%	.317	—	—	—	—	—	1.86	361	69
Jhan Mariñez R 2022 · 5.36 FIP	33	SU	5.36	17.4%	11.4%	4.2%	.324	—	—	—	—	—	3.16	253	69
Fernando Nieve R 2015 · 4.27 FIP	33	SU	4.27	22.0%	10.5%	3.1%	.290	2.43	26.9%	22.6%	89	-1.84	1.96	287	69
Rudy Gonzalez R 2015 · 4.52 FIP	34	SW	4.52	13.5%	9.6%	2.4%	.347	3.84	14.0%	6.5%	79	-0.68	3.31	119	68
Jim Henderson R 2016 · 4.55 FIP	33	SU	4.55	25.8%	9.0%	4.5%	.287	—	—	—	—	—	1.86	167	68
Jumbo Diaz R 2017 · 4.17 FIP	33	SU	4.17	20.0%	9.7%	2.8%	.302	2.90	24.2%	15.4%	98	-1.27	2.80	319	68
Juan Sandoval R 2015 · 3.82 FIP	34	SU	3.82	15.4%	6.0%	2.3%	.294	3.33	17.4%	8.8%	116	-0.49	3.24	225	67