Alex Wood
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 31 | MLBSF | 26 | 26 | 131 | 5.10 | 3.45 | 23.6% | 5.2% | 3.1 | ||
| 2023 | 32 | MIX2 levels | 31 | 14 | 104 | 4.23 | 4.00 | 16.6% | 9.4% | 0.7 | K 17.2% · BB 9.8% · FIP 4.13 | |
| 2024 | 33 | MLBOakland Athle… | 9 | 9 | 39 | 5.26 | 4.78 | 17.7% | 9.7% | 0.3 | ||
| 2025 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 36 | MLBOAK | 24 | 24 | 142 | 4.54 | 4.53 | 21.3% | 9.3% | 1.4 | ||
| 2028PROJ | 37 | MLBOAK | 16 | 16 | 99 | 4.72 | 4.88 | 20.2% | 9.9% | 0.5 | ||
| 2029PROJ | 38 | MLBOAK | 12 | 12 | 71 | 5.08 | 5.31 | 19.1% | 10.6% | 0.0 | ||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 26 | MLBLAD | 58 | .058/.093/.058 | 0 | 0 | -65 | -1.0 | |
| 2018 | 27 | MLBLAD | 50 | .045/.045/.045 | 0 | 1 | -89 | -1.0 | |
| 2021 | 30 | MLBSF | 47 | .000/.116/.000 | 0 | 0 | -64 | -0.9 | |
| 2022 | 31 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 32 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 33 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 34 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 35 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | MLB MLE | Atlanta Braves | 31 | 11 | 78 | 327 | 77 | 26 | 3 | 35% | 2.5 | 23.5% | 8.0% | 15.6% | 1.0% | 3.13 | 2.66 | +1.8 |
| 2013 | 22 | MLB RAW | Atlanta Braves | 31 | 11 | 78 | 327 | 77 | 26 | 3 | 35% | 2.5 | 23.5% | 8.0% | 15.6% | 0.9% | 3.13 | 2.62 | +1.8 |
| 2014 | 23 | MLB MLE | Atlanta Braves | 35 | 24 | 172 | 694 | 170 | 44 | 16 | 69% | 4.9 | 24.5% | 6.3% | 18.2% | 2.5% | 2.78 | 3.20 | +4.7 |
| 2014 | 23 | MLB RAW | Atlanta Braves | 35 | 24 | 172 | 694 | 170 | 44 | 16 | 69% | 4.9 | 24.5% | 6.3% | 18.2% | 2.3% | 2.78 | 3.10 | +4.9 |
| 2015 | 24 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 32 | 32 | 190 | 801 | 139 | 55 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 17.4% | 6.9% | 10.5% | 1.8% | 3.84 | 3.49 | +4.4 |
| 2015 | 24 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 32 | 32 | 190 | 801 | 139 | 55 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 17.4% | 6.9% | 10.5% | 1.9% | 3.84 | 3.53 | +4.3 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 14 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 66 | 20 | 5 | 71% | 4.3 | 25.9% | 7.8% | 18.0% | 1.9% | 3.73 | 2.94 | +1.8 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 14 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 66 | 20 | 5 | 71% | 4.3 | 25.9% | 7.8% | 18.0% | 2.0% | 3.73 | 2.98 | +1.8 |
| 2017 | 26 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 27 | 25 | 152 | 614 | 151 | 32 | 15 | 93% | 5.6 | 24.6% | 5.2% | 19.4% | 2.3% | 2.72 | 2.97 | +4.7 |
| 2017 | 26 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 27 | 25 | 152 | 614 | 151 | 32 | 15 | 93% | 5.6 | 24.6% | 5.2% | 19.4% | 2.4% | 2.72 | 3.03 | +4.5 |
| 2018 | 27 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 33 | 27 | 152 | 637 | 135 | 35 | 14 | 82% | 4.6 | 21.2% | 5.5% | 15.7% | 2.1% | 3.68 | 3.16 | +4.2 |
| 2018 | 27 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 33 | 27 | 152 | 637 | 135 | 35 | 14 | 82% | 4.6 | 21.2% | 5.5% | 15.7% | 2.2% | 3.68 | 3.21 | +4.1 |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 11 | 11 | 47 | 201 | 41 | 11 | 11 | 100% | 4.3 | 19.6% | 5.9% | 13.7% | 6.7% | 5.17 | 5.84 | -0.2 |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 11 | 11 | 47 | 201 | 41 | 11 | 11 | 100% | 4.3 | 20.4% | 5.5% | 14.9% | 5.5% | 5.17 | 5.10 | +0.2 |
| 2020 | 29 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 9 | 2 | 13 | 65 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 22% | 1.4 | 23.1% | 7.7% | 15.4% | 3.0% | 6.39 | 3.75 | +0.1 |
| 2020 | 29 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 9 | 2 | 13 | 65 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 22% | 1.4 | 23.1% | 7.7% | 15.4% | 3.1% | 6.39 | 3.97 | +0.1 |
| 2021 | 30 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 26 | 26 | 139 | 585 | 152 | 38 | 14 | 100% | 5.3 | 26.0% | 6.5% | 19.5% | 2.6% | 3.83 | 3.15 | +3.9 |
| 2021 | 30 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 26 | 26 | 139 | 585 | 152 | 38 | 14 | 100% | 5.3 | 26.0% | 6.5% | 19.5% | 2.4% | 3.83 | 3.04 | +4.1 |
| 2022 | 31 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 26 | 26 | 131 | 555 | 131 | 29 | 17 | 100% | 5.0 | 23.6% | 5.2% | 18.4% | 3.3% | 5.10 | 3.59 | +2.9 |
| 2022 | 31 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 26 | 26 | 131 | 555 | 131 | 29 | 17 | 100% | 5.0 | 23.6% | 5.2% | 18.4% | 3.1% | 5.10 | 3.45 | +3.1 |
| 2023 | 32 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 14 | 104 | 457 | 76 | 43 | 9 | 45% | 3.4 | 17.2% | 9.8% | 7.5% | 2.3% | 4.23 | 4.13 | +0.5 |
| 2023 | 32 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 14 | 104 | 457 | 76 | 43 | 9 | 45% | 3.4 | 16.6% | 9.4% | 7.2% | 2.0% | 4.23 | 4.00 | +0.7 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 9 | 9 | 39 | 186 | 33 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 4.4 | 17.7% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 3.5% | 5.26 | 4.77 | +0.3 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 9 | 9 | 39 | 186 | 33 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 4.4 | 17.7% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 3.5% | 5.26 | 4.77 | +0.3 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 9 | 9 | 39 | 186 | 33 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 4.4 | 17.7% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 3.2% | 5.26 | 4.78 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 278 | 211 | 1258 | 5301 | 1173 | 353 | 127 | 76% | 4.5 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 15.5% | 2.4% | 3.78 | 3.39 | +30.8 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 36 | MLB | OAK | 24 | 24 | 142 | 600 | 128 | 56 | 18 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.3% | 9.3% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 4.54 | 4.53 | +1.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 37 | MLB MLE | OAK | 16 | 16 | 99 | 417 | 84 | 41 | 14 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.2% | 9.9% | 10.3% | 3.5% | 4.77 | 4.93 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 38 | MLB MLE | OAK | 12 | 12 | 71 | 301 | 57 | 32 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.1% | 10.6% | 8.4% | 3.9% | 5.13 | 5.36 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 37 | MLB CTX | OAK | 16 | 16 | 99 | 418 | 84 | 42 | 14 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.2% | 9.9% | 10.3% | 3.4% | 4.72 | 4.88 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 38 | MLB CTX | OAK | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 57 | 32 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.1% | 10.6% | 8.4% | 3.8% | 5.08 | 5.31 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 306 | 239 | 1428 | 6019 | 1315 | 426 | 153 | 78% | 4.7 | 21.8% | 7.1% | 14.8% | 2.5% | 3.91 | 3.54 | +32.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 43 | 34 | 200 | 843 | 184 | 60 | 21 | 78% | 4.7 | 21.8% | 7.1% | 14.8% | 2.5% | 3.91 | 3.54 | +4.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 284 | 217 | 1276 | 5377 | 1187 | 359 | 133 | 76% | 4.5 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 15.4% | 2.5% | 3.77 | 3.44 | +31.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 34 | 200 | 843 | 186 | 56 | 21 | 76% | 4.5 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 15.4% | 2.5% | 3.77 | 3.44 | +4.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAASacramento River Cats · 7 IPFIP 2.95 → 2.99 (+0.04)K% 7.1% → 6.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 7.14% | — | ×0.860 | 6.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.57% | — | ×0.900 | 3.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.057 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 2.95 → 2.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAALouisville Bats · 5 IPFIP 1.80 → 2.12 (+0.32)K% 26.9% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.92% | — | ×0.880 | 23.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.69% | — | ×1.050 | 8.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.957 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 1.80 → 2.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 6 IPFIP 1.56 → 1.86 (+0.29)K% 18.2% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.18% | — | ×0.810 | 14.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.979 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 1.56 → 1.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).