Jacob Wosinski
P Cedar Rapids Kernels| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 36 | 2 | 64 | 4.20 | 4.41 | 23.8% | 11.9% | — | K 18.4% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.29 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 0 | 61 | 3.98 | 3.26 | 19.3% | 9.1% | — | K 15.2% · BB 10.0% · FIP 3.89 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 0 | 26 | 4.78 | 4.39 | 21.8% | 9.1% | — | K 17.0% · BB 10.1% · FIP 5.39 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBMIN | — | — | 0 | 5.02 | 5.02 | 16.8% | 10.4% | — | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBMIN | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5.03 | 5.08 | 17.3% | 10.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 24 | ROK MLE | FCL Twins | 12 | 6 | 33 | 161 | 42 | 16 | 6 | 50% | 2.8 | 17.7% | 12.4% | 5.3% | 5.7% | 6.21 | 6.31 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | ROK RAW | FCL Twins | 12 | 6 | 33 | 161 | 42 | 16 | 6 | 50% | 2.8 | 26.1% | 9.9% | 16.1% | 3.7% | 6.21 | 4.36 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 2 | 64 | 277 | 66 | 33 | 9 | 6% | 1.8 | 18.4% | 14.0% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 4.20 | 5.29 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 2 | 64 | 277 | 66 | 33 | 9 | 6% | 1.8 | 18.4% | 14.0% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 4.20 | 5.29 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 36 | 2 | 64 | 277 | 66 | 33 | 9 | 6% | 1.8 | 23.8% | 11.9% | 11.9% | 3.2% | 4.20 | 4.41 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 49 | 23 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 15.2% | 10.0% | 5.2% | 1.5% | 3.98 | 3.89 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 49 | 23 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 15.2% | 10.0% | 5.2% | 1.5% | 3.98 | 3.89 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 49 | 23 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 19.3% | 9.1% | 10.2% | 1.2% | 3.98 | 3.26 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 17.0% | 10.1% | 6.9% | 4.5% | 4.78 | 5.39 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 17.0% | 10.1% | 6.9% | 4.5% | 4.78 | 5.39 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 21.8% | 9.1% | 12.7% | 3.6% | 4.78 | 4.39 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | MIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.8% | 10.4% | 6.4% | 3.0% | 5.02 | 5.02 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIN | 17 | 0 | 18 | 75 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.3% | 10.5% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 5.08 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIN | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.3% | 10.5% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 5.08 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.3% | 10.5% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 4.70 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 149 | 75 | 37 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.3% | 10.5% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 4.70 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 107 | 8 | 185 | 802 | 137 | 95 | 28 | 7% | 1.7 | 17.1% | 11.9% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 4.57 | 5.06 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 116 | 9 | 200 | 867 | 148 | 103 | 30 | 7% | 1.7 | 17.1% | 11.9% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 4.57 | 5.06 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 14 IPFIP 2.65 → 3.86 (+1.22)K% 33.9% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.93% | — | ×0.770 | 26.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.57% | — | ×1.150 | 4.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.46% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.65 → 3.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAWichita Wind Surge · 12 IPFIP 6.23 → 6.97 (+0.74)K% 9.3% → 7.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 9.26% | — | ×0.810 | 7.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.81% | — | ×1.100 | 16.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.70% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 4.44% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 6.23 → 6.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAWichita Wind Surge · 36 IPFIP 4.12 → 4.68 (+0.56)K% 15.3% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.29% | — | ×0.810 | 12.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.74% | — | ×1.100 | 14.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.27% | ÷0.986 | ×1.200 | 1.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 4.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 25 IPFIP 1.88 → 2.61 (+0.73)K% 25.8% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.77% | — | ×0.770 | 19.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.09% | — | ×1.150 | 3.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.03% | ÷0.962 | ×1.250 | 1.34% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 1.88 → 2.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 60 IPFIP 4.50 → 5.29 (+0.79)K% 24.0% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.95% | — | ×0.770 | 18.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.17% | — | ×1.150 | 13.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.42% | ÷1.191 | ×1.250 | 3.59% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 4.50 → 5.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Twins · 33 IPFIP 4.20 → 6.31 (+2.11)K% 26.1% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.09% | — | ×0.680 | 17.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.94% | — | ×1.250 | 12.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.73% | ÷0.913 | ×1.400 | 5.71% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 4.20 → 6.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).