John Estevez
OF FCL Braves| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKATL | 196 | .200/.375/.313 | 1 | 7 | 38 | — | .141/.271/.221 |
| 2025 | 19 | A/ROKATL | 181 | .180/.317/.247 | 1 | 3 | 16 | — | .137/.228/.186 |
| 2026 | 20 | A+/A/ROKATL | 92 | .216/.348/.243 | 0 | 2 | 27 | — | .154/.258/.167 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBATL | 202 | .187/.267/.253 | 1 | 3 | 50 | -0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBATL | 42 | .193/.274/.274 | 0 | 1 | 58 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 25 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Braves | — | 224 | 177 | 35 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 42 | 42 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 198 | 359 | 322 | 681 | 124 | 241 | 19 | 19 | 319 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 150 | 30 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 38 | 49 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 200 | 375 | 313 | 688 | 113 | 279 | 25 | 19 | 321 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 29 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 345 | 174 | 519 | 222 | 17 | 21 | 269 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Braves | — | 152 | 127 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 32 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 181 | 311 | 260 | 571 | 79 | 234 | 21 | 15 | 272 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ | Rome Emperors | — | 19 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 368 | 250 | 618 | 444 | 37 | 16 | 301 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 23 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 190 | 227 | 190 | 418 | 286 | 35 | 4 | 188 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK | FCL Braves | — | 50 | 37 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 216 | 396 | 270 | 666 | 54 | 308 | 26 | 18 | 315 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 224 | 191 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 53 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 131 | 256 | 204 | 460 | 73 | 167 | 24 | 13 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 163 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 68 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 141 | 271 | 221 | 492 | 80 | 209 | 35 | 13 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 29 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 160 | 276 | 160 | 436 | 207 | 24 | 14 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 152 | 136 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 47 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 132 | 219 | 191 | 410 | 59 | 188 | 31 | 9 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A+ MLE | Rome Emperors | — | 19 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 263 | 176 | 440 | 403 | 47 | 11 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 23 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 143 | 182 | 143 | 325 | 268 | 48 | 4 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 50 | 40 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 150 | 292 | 175 | 467 | 25 | 244 | 38 | 12 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 224 | 191 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 53 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 131 | 256 | 204 | 460 | 73 | 168 | 24 | 13 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Braves | — | 224 | 177 | 35 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 42 | 42 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 198 | 359 | 322 | 681 | 124 | 241 | 19 | 19 | 319 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 163 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 68 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 141 | 271 | 221 | 492 | 80 | 224 | 35 | 13 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 150 | 30 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 38 | 49 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 200 | 375 | 313 | 688 | 113 | 279 | 25 | 19 | 321 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 181 | 160 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 54 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 131 | 228 | 181 | 409 | 50 | 190 | 30 | 10 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 181 | 150 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 37 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 180 | 317 | 247 | 563 | 67 | 232 | 20 | 16 | 272 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 92 | 79 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 152 | 247 | 165 | 412 | 13 | 279 | 42 | 9 | 209 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK RAW | 3 teams | — | 92 | 74 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 28 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 216 | 348 | 243 | 592 | 27 | 327 | 30 | 14 | 280 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 224 | 190 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 53 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 132 | 256 | 205 | 461 | 74 | 167 | 24 | 13 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 165 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 68 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 139 | 271 | 218 | 489 | 79 | 209 | 35 | 13 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 181 | 159 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 54 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 132 | 228 | 182 | 410 | 50 | 191 | 30 | 10 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 92 | 82 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 146 | 247 | 159 | 406 | 12 | 283 | 42 | 9 | 209 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 196 | 165 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 68 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 139 | 271 | 218 | 489 | 79 | 209 | 35 | 13 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 181 | 159 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 54 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 132 | 228 | 182 | 410 | 50 | 191 | 30 | 10 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 3 teams | — | 92 | 82 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 146 | 247 | 159 | 406 | 12 | 283 | 42 | 9 | 209 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | ATL | 0% | 202 | 180 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 56 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 187 | 267 | 253 | 521 | 67 | 260 | 28 | 9 | 242 | 50 | -12 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | ATL | 34% | 123 | 110 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 33 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 193 | 274 | 274 | 548 | 81 | 263 | 27 | 9 | 253 | 58 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | ATL | 34% | 42 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 193 | 274 | 274 | 548 | 81 | 263 | 26 | 10 | 253 | 58 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 42 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 158 | 238 | 184 | 422 | 26 | 222 | 26 | 10 | 253 | 35 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 588 | 92 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 170 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 156 | 237 | 182 | 419 | 26 | 220 | 26 | 10 | 253 | 35 | -33 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 876 | 757 | 111 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 97 | 264 | 12 | 19 | 11 | 147 | 254 | 209 | 463 | 62 | 213 | 30 | 11 | 220 | 35 | -10 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 562 | 83 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 72 | 196 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 148 | 255 | 212 | 467 | 64 | 214 | 30 | 11 | 220 | 35 | -35 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Braves · 50 PAwOBA .321 → .230 (−91)K% 26.0% → 37.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 37.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 11.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 2.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.995 | 20.40% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 5.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .321 → .230; ISO .054 → .039; BABIP .308 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAugusta GreenJackets · 23 PAwOBA .191 → .155 (−36)K% 34.8% → 47.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.78% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 47.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 3.09% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.77% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 29.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .191 → .155; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .286 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Rome Emperors · 19 PAwOBA .294 → .217 (−78)K% 36.8% → 48.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 36.84% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 48.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.042 | 9.87% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 44.44% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | — | ×1.042 | 40.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .294 → .217; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .444 → .403. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Braves · 152 PAwOBA .266 → .188 (−78)K% 21.1% → 30.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.05% | ÷0.980 | ×1.440 | — | — | 30.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.13% | ÷1.013 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 9.33% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.66% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.84% | ÷1.005 | ×0.820 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 14.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.996 | ×0.720 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 3.88% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 0.77% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.05% | ÷0.856 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.97% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 101, 2B 99, 3B 100, K 96, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .266 → .188; ISO .079 → .059; BABIP .234 → .188. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAugusta GreenJackets · 29 PAwOBA .264 → .216 (−48)K% 17.2% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.24% | ÷0.984 | ×1.360 | — | — | 23.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 20.69% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 15.15% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.22% | ÷1.030 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.045 | 20.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.977 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.037 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.281 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 106, 2B 95, 3B 107, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .264 → .216; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .222 → .207. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Braves · 196 PAwOBA .321 → .224 (−97)K% 25.0% → 34.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.00% | ÷1.037 | ×1.440 | — | — | 34.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.39% | ÷0.965 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 12.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.04% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 1.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.82% | ÷1.047 | ×0.820 | ×0.987 | ×1.022 | 14.09% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.92% | ÷1.022 | ×0.720 | ×0.987 | ×1.022 | 5.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.97% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×0.987 | ×1.022 | 1.88% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.99% | ÷1.266 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 0.62% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 153, 1B 109, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 107, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .321 → .224; ISO .113 → .075; BABIP .279 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Braves · 224 PAwOBA .314 → .218 (−96)K% 18.8% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.75% | ÷0.961 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.75% | ÷1.048 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 12.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.34% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 0.96% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.56% | ÷1.004 | ×0.680 | ×1.032 | ×1.022 | 11.12% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷0.913 | ×0.600 | ×1.032 | ×1.022 | 4.62% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.48% | ÷1.141 | ×0.600 | ×1.032 | ×1.022 | 0.82% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.22% | ÷0.816 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.022 | 1.31% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 63, 1B 101, 2B 83, 3B 128, K 92, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.
Result: wOBA .314 → .218; ISO .124 → .081; BABIP .241 → .167. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).