Tyler Schoff
P Rome Emperors| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 31 | 0 | 38 | 4.70 | 3.07 | 25.3% | 5.7% | — | K 21.0% · BB 6.9% · FIP 3.77 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 9 | 0 | 11 | 5.56 | 4.69 | 29.6% | 14.8% | — | K 29.6% · BB 14.8% · FIP 4.51 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 30 | 0 | 43 | 4.98 | 3.84 | 16.9% | 10.1% | — | K 12.5% · BB 11.7% · FIP 4.62 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBATL | — | — | 0 | 5.03 | 5.03 | 17.2% | 10.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBATL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.03 | 5.09 | 17.6% | 10.9% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 11 | 51 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.6 | 21.6% | 9.8% | 11.8% | 2.0% | 2.38 | 3.60 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 0 | 11 | 51 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.6 | 21.6% | 9.8% | 11.8% | 2.0% | 2.38 | 3.63 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Fredericksburg Nationals | 35 | 0 | 53 | 230 | 61 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.5 | 19.6% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 4.89 | 4.25 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Fredericksburg Nationals | 35 | 0 | 53 | 230 | 61 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.5 | 26.5% | 9.1% | 17.4% | 2.2% | 4.89 | 3.21 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 46 | 0 | 62 | 267 | 83 | 22 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 25.2% | 8.7% | 16.5% | 3.0% | 3.61 | 3.69 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 46 | 0 | 62 | 267 | 83 | 22 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 31.1% | 8.2% | 22.8% | 2.2% | 3.61 | 2.75 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 38 | 158 | 40 | 9 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.0% | 6.9% | 14.1% | 2.9% | 4.70 | 3.77 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 38 | 158 | 40 | 9 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.0% | 6.9% | 14.1% | 2.9% | 4.70 | 3.77 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 38 | 158 | 40 | 9 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.3% | 5.7% | 19.6% | 2.5% | 4.70 | 3.07 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 0 | 11 | 54 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 29.6% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 3.7% | 5.56 | 4.51 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 0 | 11 | 54 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 29.6% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 3.7% | 5.56 | 4.51 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 0 | 11 | 54 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 29.6% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 3.7% | 5.56 | 4.69 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 0 | 43 | 189 | 32 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 12.5% | 11.7% | 0.7% | 2.0% | 4.98 | 4.62 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 0 | 43 | 189 | 32 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 12.5% | 11.7% | 0.7% | 2.0% | 4.98 | 4.62 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 0 | 43 | 189 | 32 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 16.9% | 10.1% | 6.9% | 1.6% | 4.98 | 3.84 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | ATL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.2% | 10.9% | 6.3% | 3.0% | 5.03 | 5.03 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | ATL | 18 | 0 | 18 | 78 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.6% | 10.9% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 5.09 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | ATL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.6% | 10.9% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 5.09 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.6% | 10.9% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 4.71 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 144 | 108 | 36 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.6% | 10.9% | 6.7% | 3.1% | 5.03 | 4.71 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 158 | 0 | 220 | 949 | 196 | 94 | 25 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.7% | 9.9% | 10.8% | 2.7% | 4.42 | 4.07 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 144 | 0 | 200 | 863 | 178 | 86 | 23 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.7% | 9.9% | 10.8% | 2.7% | 4.42 | 4.07 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Rome Emperors · 26 IPFIP 4.77 → 5.70 (+0.93)K% 16.8% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.81% | — | ×0.770 | 12.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.45% | — | ×1.150 | 15.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.52% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 3.15% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.77 → 5.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Nationals · 18 IPFIP 2.20 → 2.79 (+0.60)K% 17.1% → 11.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.14% | — | ×0.680 | 11.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.29% | — | ×1.250 | 5.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.20 → 2.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAARochester Red Wings · 7 IPFIP 5.42 → 6.15 (+0.74)K% 29.0% → 25.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.03% | — | ×0.860 | 24.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×0.900 | 8.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.45% | ÷0.960 | ×1.100 | 7.39% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 5.42 → 6.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAHarrisburg Senators · 4 IPFIP 3.28 → 4.05 (+0.76)K% 30.4% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.43% | — | ×0.810 | 24.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 21.74% | — | ×1.100 | 23.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.963 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 3.28 → 4.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAHarrisburg Senators · 32 IPFIP 3.00 → 3.77 (+0.77)K% 26.0% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.98% | — | ×0.810 | 21.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.30% | — | ×1.100 | 6.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.36% | ÷0.990 | ×1.200 | 2.86% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 3.00 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 6 IPFIP 3.37 → 4.28 (+0.91)K% 22.6% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.58% | — | ×0.770 | 17.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.23% | — | ×1.150 | 3.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷1.016 | ×1.250 | 3.97% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.37 → 4.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 35 IPFIP 2.31 → 3.70 (+1.39)K% 36.6% → 28.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.55% | — | ×0.770 | 28.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.21% | — | ×1.150 | 7.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.76% | ÷0.913 | ×1.250 | 3.78% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 2.31 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAHarrisburg Senators · 27 IPFIP 3.06 → 3.69 (+0.62)K% 26.5% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.55% | — | ×0.810 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.73% | — | ×1.100 | 10.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.77% | ÷1.115 | ×1.200 | 1.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 3.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).