Zak Kent
P Rochester Red Wings| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 15 | 4 | 26 | 6.66 | 3.80 | 25.4% | 14.8% | — | K 21.5% · BB 14.0% · FIP 4.04 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 46 | 0 | 56 | 3.40 | 2.99 | 28.1% | 12.3% | 1.0 | K 25.1% · BB 11.4% · FIP 3.13 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 51 | 6 | 73 | 4.81 | 4.42 | 20.9% | 9.0% | 0.1 | K 18.5% · BB 8.4% · FIP 4.62 |
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBWSH | 44 | 0 | 46 | 4.70 | 4.90 | 18.7% | 10.8% | -0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ80% MLB | 30 | MLBWSH | 25 | 0 | 26 | 4.88 | 5.05 | 18.5% | 11.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ85% MLB | 31 | MLBWSH | 15 | 0 | 16 | 5.06 | 5.22 | 18.1% | 11.2% | -0.1 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Rangers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -1.12 | — |
| 2019 | 21 | ROK RAW | AZL Rangers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.90 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 15 | 89 | 367 | 117 | 23 | 14 | 75% | 4.5 | 25.0% | 7.1% | 17.9% | 4.6% | 3.64 | 4.40 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 15 | 89 | 367 | 117 | 23 | 14 | 75% | 4.5 | 31.9% | 6.3% | 25.6% | 3.8% | 3.64 | 3.29 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 110 | 462 | 110 | 43 | 13 | 100% | 4.6 | 19.6% | 10.1% | 9.5% | 3.6% | 3.94 | 4.71 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 110 | 462 | 110 | 43 | 13 | 100% | 4.6 | 23.8% | 9.3% | 14.5% | 2.8% | 3.94 | 3.81 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 13 | 41 | 171 | 43 | 13 | 7 | 100% | 3.1 | 20.9% | 6.4% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 3.82 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 13 | 41 | 171 | 43 | 13 | 7 | 100% | 3.1 | 25.1% | 7.6% | 17.5% | 4.1% | 4.87 | 4.18 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 4 | 26 | 122 | 31 | 18 | 2 | 27% | 1.7 | 21.5% | 14.0% | 7.5% | 1.8% | 6.66 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 4 | 26 | 122 | 31 | 18 | 2 | 27% | 1.7 | 21.5% | 14.0% | 7.5% | 1.8% | 6.66 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 15 | 4 | 26 | 122 | 31 | 18 | 2 | 27% | 1.7 | 25.4% | 14.8% | 10.7% | 1.6% | 6.66 | 3.80 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 56 | 235 | 66 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.1% | 11.4% | 13.7% | 1.3% | 3.40 | 3.13 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 56 | 235 | 66 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.1% | 11.4% | 13.7% | 1.3% | 3.40 | 3.13 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 56 | 235 | 66 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 28.1% | 12.3% | 15.7% | 1.3% | 3.40 | 2.99 | +1.0 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 51 | 6 | 73 | 321 | 67 | 29 | 11 | 12% | 1.4 | 18.5% | 8.4% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 4.81 | 4.62 | -0.1 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 51 | 6 | 73 | 321 | 67 | 29 | 11 | 12% | 1.4 | 18.5% | 8.4% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 4.81 | 4.62 | -0.1 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 51 | 6 | 73 | 321 | 67 | 29 | 11 | 12% | 1.4 | 20.9% | 9.0% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 4.81 | 4.42 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 23 | 0 | 34 | 153 | 28 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.3% | 10.5% | 7.8% | 2.6% | 5.03 | 4.39 | +0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | WSH | 44 | 0 | 46 | 194 | 36 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.7% | 10.8% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.90 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | WSH | 31 | 0 | 33 | 138 | 25 | 15 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.5% | 11.0% | 7.5% | 3.2% | 4.88 | 5.05 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB MLE | WSH | 18 | 0 | 19 | 80 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.1% | 11.2% | 6.9% | 3.4% | 5.06 | 5.22 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | WSH | 25 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 20 | 12 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.5% | 11.0% | 7.5% | 3.2% | 4.88 | 5.05 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB CTX | WSH | 15 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.1% | 11.2% | 6.9% | 3.4% | 5.06 | 5.22 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 63 | 0 | 76 | 332 | 61 | 36 | 10 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.3% | 10.8% | 7.5% | 3.0% | 4.98 | 4.54 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 166 | 0 | 200 | 869 | 160 | 94 | 26 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.3% | 10.8% | 7.5% | 3.0% | 4.98 | 4.54 | +0.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 170 | 62 | 395 | 1682 | 365 | 155 | 56 | 36% | 2.3 | 21.7% | 9.2% | 12.5% | 3.3% | 4.22 | 4.25 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 86 | 31 | 200 | 852 | 185 | 78 | 28 | 36% | 2.3 | 21.7% | 9.2% | 12.5% | 3.3% | 4.22 | 4.25 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAARochester Red Wings · 57 IPFIP 4.09 → 4.42 (+0.34)K% 22.5% → 19.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.54% | — | ×0.860 | 19.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.61% | — | ×0.900 | 7.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.61% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.09 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 38 IPFIP 2.81 → 3.02 (+0.21)K% 31.4% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.45% | — | ×0.860 | 27.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.21% | — | ×0.900 | 11.89% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.26% | ÷1.093 | ×1.100 | 1.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 2.81 → 3.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 24 IPFIP 3.90 → 4.04 (+0.13)K% 25.0% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.860 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.52% | — | ×0.900 | 13.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷1.060 | ×1.100 | 1.79% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 3.90 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAARound Rock Express · 34 IPFIP 3.52 → 3.82 (+0.30)K% 24.3% → 20.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.29% | — | ×0.860 | 20.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.14% | — | ×0.900 | 6.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.86% | ÷1.035 | ×1.100 | 3.04% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 3.52 → 3.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Rangers · 7 IPFIP 7.19 → 9.58 (+2.40)K% 29.0% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.03% | — | ×0.680 | 19.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×1.250 | 12.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 9.68% | ÷1.124 | ×1.400 | 12.06% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 7.19 → 9.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 83 IPFIP 3.80 → 4.84 (+1.03)K% 24.6% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.58% | — | ×0.810 | 19.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.47% | — | ×1.100 | 9.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.11% | ÷0.915 | ×1.200 | 4.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 3.80 → 4.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAARound Rock Express · 27 IPFIP 3.84 → 4.29 (+0.44)K% 21.3% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.30% | — | ×0.880 | 18.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.04% | — | ×1.050 | 12.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷0.957 | ×1.100 | 2.13% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.84 → 4.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Hickory Crawdads · 60 IPFIP 2.30 → 3.52 (+1.22)K% 32.2% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.23% | — | ×0.770 | 24.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.20% | — | ×1.150 | 7.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.07% | ÷0.881 | ×1.250 | 2.93% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.30 → 3.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.7 | 49 | 18.5% | 10.8% | 1.15 | 4.86 |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Mike Matthews ('05) | 1.2 | 61 | 16.3% | 11.3% | 1.07 | 4.54 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |