Zak Kent

P Rochester Red Wings
Age 29 RHP 6'3" / 208 lbs AAA
Overview
AAARP40-MANROOKIE
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202426MIX2 levels154266.663.8025.4%14.8%—K 21.5% · BB 14.0% · FIP 4.04
202527MIX2 levels460563.402.9928.1%12.3%1.0K 25.1% · BB 11.4% · FIP 3.13
202628MIX2 levels516734.814.4220.9%9.0%0.1K 18.5% · BB 8.4% · FIP 4.62
2027PROJ29MLBWSH440464.704.9018.7%10.8%-0.2
2028PROJ80% MLB30MLBWSH250264.885.0518.5%11.0%-0.1
2029PROJ85% MLB31MLBWSH150165.065.2218.1%11.2%-0.1
Last 3 seasons WAR 1.2  ·  Next 3 projected WAR -0.4Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
Skills · percentileStatcast 2026
FB Velo26
xwOBA vs19
K%10
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 -0.2 / P90 0.3, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 96%
CompsYoanner Negrin (age 31) · Ramon Delgado (age 29) · Vinny Nittoli (age 28)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 126118vR 110
ERA4.70
FIP4.90
K%18.7%
BB%10.8%
K-BB%7.9%
Proj IP63
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 63 IP
K: -1.7 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-2KBB: -1.6 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-2BBCONTACT: -1.7 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-2CONTACTSTAM: +3.0 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+3STAMTotal WAR: -0.21 (63 IP)-0.2WAR
-0.3-0.1-0.1272829
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Scouting Grades
STUF4545
CTRL4040
CMD4040
K†4545
Statcast Percentiles
FB Velo
p2692.8
Whiff%
p2021.1%
K%
p1015.6%
xwOBA vs
p190.349

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201921ROK MLEAZL Rangers10142000%1.050.0%0.0%50.0%0.0%0.00-1.12—
201921ROK RAWAZL Rangers10142000%1.050.0%0.0%50.0%0.0%0.00-0.90—
202123MIX MLE2 levels201589367117231475%4.525.0%7.1%17.9%4.6%3.644.40—
202123MIX RAW2 levels201589367117231475%4.531.9%6.3%25.6%3.8%3.643.29—
202224MIX MLE2 levels24241104621104313100%4.619.6%10.1%9.5%3.6%3.944.71—
202224MIX RAW2 levels24241104621104313100%4.623.8%9.3%14.5%2.8%3.943.81—
202325MIX MLE2 levels13134117143137100%3.120.9%6.4%14.5%3.0%4.873.82—
202325MIX RAW2 levels13134117143137100%3.125.1%7.6%17.5%4.1%4.874.18—
202426MIX MLE2 levels154261223118227%1.721.5%14.0%7.5%1.8%6.664.04—
202426MIX MLE2 levels154261223118227%1.721.5%14.0%7.5%1.8%6.664.04—
202426MIX RAW2 levels154261223118227%1.725.4%14.8%10.7%1.6%6.663.80—
202527MIX MLE2 levels46056235662930%1.225.1%11.4%13.7%1.3%3.403.13+0.9
202527MIX MLE2 levels46056235662930%1.225.1%11.4%13.7%1.3%3.403.13+0.9
202527MIX RAW2 levels46056235662930%1.228.1%12.3%15.7%1.3%3.402.99+1.0
202628MIX MLE2 levels5167332167291112%1.418.5%8.4%10.1%3.7%4.814.62-0.1
202628MIX MLE2 levels5167332167291112%1.418.5%8.4%10.1%3.7%4.814.62-0.1
202628MIX RAW2 levels5167332167291112%1.420.9%9.0%11.8%3.4%4.814.42+0.1
▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded)
MLB Career—23034153281640%1.518.3%10.5%7.8%2.6%5.034.39+0.1
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202729MLBWSH44046194362160%1.018.7%10.8%7.9%3.0%4.704.90-0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202830MLB MLEWSH31033138251540%1.118.5%11.0%7.5%3.2%4.885.05-0.2
202931MLB MLEWSH180198015930%1.118.1%11.2%6.9%3.4%5.065.22-0.1
202830MLB CTXWSH25026110201230%1.018.5%11.0%7.5%3.2%4.885.05-0.1
202931MLB CTXWSH150166812820%1.118.1%11.2%6.9%3.4%5.065.22-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW630763326136100%1.218.3%10.8%7.5%3.0%4.984.54+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW166020086916094260%1.218.3%10.8%7.5%3.0%4.984.54+0.0
Career— MLE1706239516823651555636%2.321.7%9.2%12.5%3.3%4.224.25-0.3
/ 200 IP— MLE8631200852185782836%2.321.7%9.2%12.5%3.3%4.224.25-0.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AAARochester Red Wings · 57 IPFIP 4.09 → 4.42 (+0.34)K% 22.5% → 19.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.54%—×0.86019.39%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.61%—×0.9007.75%
HR / BF /BF3.28%÷1.000×1.1003.61%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 4.09 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 38 IPFIP 2.81 → 3.02 (+0.21)K% 31.4% → 27.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF31.45%—×0.86027.04%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.21%—×0.90011.89%
HR / BF /BF1.26%÷1.093×1.1001.27%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).

Result: FIP 2.81 → 3.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 24 IPFIP 3.90 → 4.04 (+0.13)K% 25.0% → 21.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.00%—×0.86021.50%
BB% (unintentional) /BF15.52%—×0.90013.97%
HR / BF /BF1.72%÷1.060×1.1001.79%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).

Result: FIP 3.90 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAARound Rock Express · 34 IPFIP 3.52 → 3.82 (+0.30)K% 24.3% → 20.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.29%—×0.86020.89%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.14%—×0.9006.43%
HR / BF /BF2.86%÷1.035×1.1003.04%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).

Result: FIP 3.52 → 3.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKACL Rangers · 7 IPFIP 7.19 → 9.58 (+2.40)K% 29.0% → 19.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.03%—×0.68019.74%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.68%—×1.25012.10%
HR / BF /BF9.68%÷1.124×1.40012.06%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).

Result: FIP 7.19 → 9.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 83 IPFIP 3.80 → 4.84 (+1.03)K% 24.6% → 19.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.58%—×0.81019.91%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.47%—×1.1009.32%
HR / BF /BF3.11%÷0.915×1.2004.08%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).

Result: FIP 3.80 → 4.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAARound Rock Express · 27 IPFIP 3.84 → 4.29 (+0.44)K% 21.3% → 18.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.30%—×0.88018.74%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.04%—×1.05012.64%
HR / BF /BF1.85%÷0.957×1.1002.13%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).

Result: FIP 3.84 → 4.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Hickory Crawdads · 60 IPFIP 2.30 → 3.52 (+1.22)K% 32.2% → 24.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF32.23%—×0.77024.82%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.20%—×1.1507.13%
HR / BF /BF2.07%÷0.881×1.2502.93%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).

Result: FIP 2.30 → 3.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player162sIP/yrK%BB%HR/9ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION0.74918.5%10.8%1.154.86
Valerio De Los Santos ('08)1.35118.7%11.5%1.304.57
Josias Manzanillo ('04)1.75720.0%10.2%1.214.71
Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*)1.35220.3%*11.5%*1.13*4.84*
Mike Matthews ('05)1.26116.3%11.3%1.074.54
Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*)1.24717.7%*10.2%*1.10*4.27*
Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*)1.25918.3%*9.8%*1.20*4.32*