Hunter McMahon

P Wichita Wind Surge
Age 29 RHP 6'3" / 185 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202224MIX3 levels431742.813.1027.1%5.7%—K 21.2% · BB 5.5% · FIP 3.68
202325MIX2 levels472725.903.9520.3%7.6%—K 16.5% · BB 8.0% · FIP 4.24
202426AAMIN80145.654.777.0%3.5%—K 5.7% · BB 3.9% · FIP 5.84
202527No MLB games played
202628No MLB games played
2027PROJ29MLBMIN——04.444.4420.8%8.3%—
2028PROJ31% MLB30MLBMIN6064.534.6020.7%8.7%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsNeil Wagner (age 29) · Tyler Sturdevant (age 29) · Diego Moreno (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 118109vR 101
ERA4.44
FIP4.44
K%20.8%
BB%8.3%
K-BB%12.5%
Proj IP8
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 8 IP
K: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: +0.0 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)+0BBCONTACT: -0.2 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.3 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+0STAMTotal WAR: +0.01 (8 IP)+0.0WAR
0.00.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201921ROK MLEGCL Nationals205194000%2.321.1%0.0%21.1%0.0%0.001.32—
201921ROK RAWGCL Nationals205194000%2.321.1%0.0%21.1%0.0%0.001.39—
202123MIX MLE2 levels532082244060%4.019.7%6.3%13.4%0.0%2.702.23—
202123MIX RAW2 levels532082244060%4.029.3%4.9%24.4%0.0%2.701.30—
202224MIX MLE3 levels43174280761682%1.721.2%5.5%15.8%3.1%2.813.68—
202224MIX RAW3 levels43174280761682%1.727.1%5.7%21.4%2.9%2.813.10—
202325MIX MLE2 levels47272316642494%1.516.5%8.0%8.5%2.8%5.904.24—
202325MIX RAW2 levels47272316642494%1.520.3%7.6%12.7%2.8%5.903.95—
202426AA MLEWichita Wind Surge8014574220%1.85.7%3.9%1.8%5.0%5.655.84—
202426AA MLEWichita Wind Surge8014574220%1.85.7%3.9%1.8%5.0%5.655.84—
202426AA RAWWichita Wind Surge8014574220%1.87.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%5.654.77—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202729MLBMIN——0——————20.8%8.3%12.5%3.0%4.444.44—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202830MLB MLEMIN170187616720%1.120.7%8.7%12.0%3.2%4.534.60-0.0
202830MLB CTXMIN606255210%1.020.7%8.7%12.0%3.2%4.534.60-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW506245210%1.120.7%8.7%12.0%3.2%4.534.22+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084417971360%1.120.7%8.7%12.0%3.2%4.534.22+0.8
Career— MLE105618475413548206%1.817.9%6.4%11.6%2.7%4.153.86-0.0
/ 200 IP— MLE114720081814752226%1.817.9%6.4%11.6%2.7%4.153.86-0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AAWichita Wind Surge · 14 IPFIP 4.88 → 5.84 (+0.97)K% 7.0% → 5.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF7.02%—×0.8105.68%
BB% (unintentional) /BF3.51%—×1.1003.86%
HR / BF /BF3.51%÷0.845×1.2004.98%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).

Result: FIP 4.88 → 5.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAWichita Wind Surge · 60 IPFIP 4.01 → 4.39 (+0.38)K% 21.5% → 17.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.51%—×0.81017.42%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.79%—×1.1007.47%
HR / BF /BF3.40%÷1.231×1.2003.31%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).

Result: FIP 4.01 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAASt. Paul Saints · 11 IPFIP 3.43 → 3.44 (+0.01)K% 13.7% → 11.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF13.73%—×0.86011.80%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.76%—×0.90010.59%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.009×1.1000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).

Result: FIP 3.43 → 3.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 38 IPFIP 1.65 → 2.35 (+0.69)K% 26.3% → 20.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.28%—×0.77020.23%
BB% (unintentional) /BF2.92%—×1.1503.36%
HR / BF /BF0.73%÷0.948×1.2500.96%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).

Result: FIP 1.65 → 2.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 32 IPFIP 3.70 → 5.21 (+1.51)K% 30.3% → 22.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.25%—×0.74022.39%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.72%—×1.1807.93%
HR / BF /BF4.20%÷1.000×1.3005.46%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 3.70 → 5.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAWichita Wind Surge · 4 IPFIP 8.38 → 9.85 (+1.48)K% 16.7% → 13.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF16.67%—×0.81013.50%
BB% (unintentional) /BF16.67%—×1.10018.33%
HR / BF /BF8.33%÷0.985×1.20010.15%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).

Result: FIP 8.38 → 9.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 18 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.23 (+0.71)K% 26.7% → 19.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.67%—×0.74019.73%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.33%—×1.1806.29%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.908×1.3000.00%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).

Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).