Gabriel Sequeira
P West Michigan Whitecaps| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24 | A+DET | 46 | 0 | 49 | 3.12 | 3.45 | 25.0% | 11.4% | — | K 19.2% · BB 13.1% · FIP 4.60 | |
| 2023 | 25 | A+DET | 45 | 0 | 49 | 2.74 | 2.29 | 27.3% | 7.7% | — | K 21.0% · BB 8.8% · FIP 3.19 | |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX4 levels | 21 | 0 | 23 | 7.94 | 3.23 | 29.1% | 16.4% | — | K 23.0% · BB 20.6% · FIP 4.92 | |
| 2025 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 4.59 | 4.59 | 23.4% | 11.4% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 30 | MLBDET | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.67 | 4.74 | 23.0% | 11.4% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 34 | 0 | 48 | 215 | 74 | 19 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 25.5% | 10.4% | 15.0% | 0.6% | 4.72 | 2.62 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 34 | 0 | 48 | 215 | 74 | 19 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 34.4% | 8.8% | 25.6% | 0.5% | 4.72 | 1.46 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | 46 | 0 | 49 | 220 | 55 | 25 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.2% | 13.1% | 6.2% | 2.7% | 3.12 | 4.60 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | 46 | 0 | 49 | 220 | 55 | 25 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.0% | 11.4% | 13.6% | 1.8% | 3.12 | 3.45 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | 45 | 0 | 49 | 209 | 57 | 16 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.0% | 8.8% | 12.2% | 1.4% | 2.74 | 3.19 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | 45 | 0 | 49 | 209 | 57 | 16 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 27.3% | 7.7% | 19.6% | 1.0% | 2.74 | 2.29 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 21 | 0 | 23 | 110 | 32 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 20.6% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 7.94 | 4.92 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 21 | 0 | 23 | 110 | 32 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 20.6% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 7.94 | 4.92 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 21 | 0 | 23 | 110 | 32 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.1% | 16.4% | 12.7% | 0.9% | 7.94 | 3.23 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.4% | 11.4% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 4.59 | 4.59 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 17 | 0 | 18 | 75 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 3.2% | 4.67 | 4.74 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 3.2% | 4.67 | 4.74 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 3.2% | 4.67 | 4.36 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 187 | 112 | 37 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 3.2% | 4.67 | 4.36 | +0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 146 | 0 | 169 | 754 | 166 | 92 | 12 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.1% | 12.2% | 9.8% | 1.6% | 4.11 | 3.69 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 173 | 0 | 200 | 894 | 197 | 109 | 15 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.1% | 12.2% | 9.8% | 1.6% | 4.11 | 3.69 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 14 IPFIP 3.67 → 4.92 (+1.25)K% 29.9% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.85% | — | ×0.770 | 22.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.91% | — | ×1.150 | 20.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.49% | ÷0.889 | ×1.250 | 2.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 3.67 → 4.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 7 IPFIP 2.45 → 3.48 (+1.03)K% 30.8% → 22.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.77% | — | ×0.740 | 22.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.38% | — | ×1.180 | 18.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 2.45 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 49 IPFIP 2.29 → 3.19 (+0.89)K% 27.3% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.770 | 21.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.66% | — | ×1.150 | 8.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.96% | ÷0.882 | ×1.250 | 1.36% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.29 → 3.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 49 IPFIP 3.43 → 4.60 (+1.18)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.36% | — | ×1.150 | 13.07% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.82% | ÷0.847 | ×1.250 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 3.43 → 4.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 48 IPFIP 1.57 → 2.62 (+1.06)K% 34.4% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.42% | — | ×0.740 | 25.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.84% | — | ×1.180 | 10.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.47% | ÷0.937 | ×1.300 | 0.65% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 1.57 → 2.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).