Adam Oller
P Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 21 | 106 | 5.52 | 5.30 | 16.4% | 11.8% | 0.1 | K 15.6% · BB 11.9% · FIP 5.45 | |
| 2023 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 22 | 134 | 6.78 | 5.44 | 21.4% | 10.2% | -0.1 | K 18.7% · BB 9.4% · FIP 5.28 | |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 17 | 95 | 5.31 | 4.68 | 22.6% | 11.4% | 0.8 | K 20.6% · BB 10.8% · FIP 4.97 | |
| 2025 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 32 | MLBMIA | 3 | 3 | 16 | 4.59 | 4.72 | 21.5% | 9.9% | 0.1 | ||
| 2028PROJ29% MLB | 33 | MLBMIA | 6 | 6 | 36 | 4.74 | 4.90 | 20.7% | 10.3% | 0.2 | ||
| 2029PROJ25% MLB | 34 | MLBMIA | 4 | 4 | 25 | 5.01 | 5.19 | 19.8% | 10.8% | 0.0 | ||
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 21 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | 13 | 9 | 55 | 236 | 46 | 9 | 7 | 69% | 4.2 | 13.3% | 4.8% | 8.5% | 4.2% | 4.45 | 4.86 | — |
| 2016 | 21 | ROK RAW | Bristol Pirates | 13 | 9 | 55 | 236 | 46 | 9 | 7 | 69% | 4.2 | 19.5% | 3.8% | 15.7% | 3.0% | 4.45 | 3.58 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 5 | 73 | 325 | 68 | 24 | 15 | 17% | 2.5 | 16.0% | 8.5% | 7.5% | 5.4% | 6.29 | 5.79 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 5 | 73 | 325 | 68 | 24 | 15 | 17% | 2.5 | 20.9% | 7.4% | 13.5% | 4.6% | 6.29 | 4.89 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A MLE | Augusta GreenJackets | 17 | 17 | 87 | 372 | 93 | 26 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 18.5% | 8.2% | 10.3% | 1.6% | 4.02 | 3.47 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A RAW | Augusta GreenJackets | 17 | 17 | 87 | 372 | 93 | 26 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 25.0% | 7.0% | 18.0% | 1.3% | 4.02 | 2.61 | — |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 120 | 498 | 138 | 47 | 9 | 100% | 5.2 | 23.1% | 10.2% | 12.8% | 2.2% | 3.45 | 3.63 | — |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 120 | 498 | 138 | 47 | 9 | 100% | 5.2 | 27.7% | 9.4% | 18.3% | 1.8% | 3.45 | 2.95 | — |
| 2022 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 21 | 106 | 476 | 78 | 56 | 17 | 81% | 4.1 | 15.6% | 11.9% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 5.52 | 5.45 | -0.1 |
| 2022 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 21 | 106 | 476 | 78 | 56 | 17 | 81% | 4.1 | 16.4% | 11.8% | 4.6% | 3.6% | 5.52 | 5.30 | +0.1 |
| 2023 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 22 | 134 | 625 | 134 | 64 | 30 | 67% | 4.1 | 18.7% | 9.4% | 9.3% | 4.7% | 6.78 | 5.28 | +0.2 |
| 2023 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 22 | 134 | 625 | 134 | 64 | 30 | 67% | 4.1 | 21.4% | 10.2% | 11.2% | 4.8% | 6.78 | 5.44 | -0.1 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 95 | 412 | 93 | 47 | 15 | 65% | 3.7 | 20.6% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 4.1% | 5.31 | 4.97 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 95 | 412 | 93 | 47 | 15 | 65% | 3.7 | 20.6% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 4.1% | 5.31 | 4.97 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 95 | 412 | 93 | 47 | 15 | 65% | 3.7 | 22.6% | 11.4% | 11.2% | 3.6% | 5.31 | 4.68 | +0.8 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 36 | 23 | 136 | 627 | 95 | 73 | 29 | 64% | 3.8 | 15.2% | 11.6% | 3.5% | 4.6% | 6.54 | 6.08 | -1.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 32 | MLB | MIA | 3 | 3 | 16 | 68 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 100% | 5.3 | 21.5% | 9.9% | 11.6% | 3.3% | 4.59 | 4.72 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 33 | MLB MLE | MIA | 21 | 21 | 125 | 529 | 109 | 55 | 19 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 3.6% | 4.84 | 5.00 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 34 | MLB MLE | MIA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 423 | 84 | 46 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.8% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 3.9% | 5.12 | 5.30 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 33 | MLB CTX | MIA | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 31 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 3.4% | 4.74 | 4.90 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 34 | MLB CTX | MIA | 4 | 4 | 25 | 106 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.8% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 5.01 | 5.19 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 46 | 33 | 197 | 884 | 147 | 100 | 38 | 72% | 4.3 | 16.6% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 6.02 | 5.49 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 47 | 34 | 200 | 897 | 149 | 101 | 39 | 72% | 4.3 | 16.6% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 6.02 | 5.49 | -0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 167 | 114 | 670 | 2944 | 543 | 281 | 109 | 68% | 4.0 | 18.4% | 9.5% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 5.17 | 4.78 | -0.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 50 | 34 | 200 | 879 | 162 | 84 | 32 | 68% | 4.0 | 18.4% | 9.5% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 5.17 | 4.78 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 53 IPFIP 4.33 → 4.86 (+0.53)K% 25.6% → 22.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.56% | — | ×0.860 | 21.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.21% | — | ×0.900 | 10.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.59% | ÷0.925 | ×1.100 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.33 → 4.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAATacoma Rainiers · 114 IPFIP 5.03 → 5.04 (+0.02)K% 23.1% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.09% | — | ×0.860 | 19.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.92% | — | ×0.900 | 8.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.77% | ÷1.157 | ×1.100 | 4.53% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 131).
Result: FIP 5.03 → 5.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 32 IPFIP 2.71 → 3.02 (+0.31)K% 23.0% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.02% | — | ×0.880 | 20.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.23% | — | ×1.050 | 12.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.075 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 2.71 → 3.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 76 IPFIP 3.11 → 3.99 (+0.87)K% 29.6% → 24.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.60% | — | ×0.810 | 23.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.03% | — | ×1.100 | 9.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.49% | ÷0.995 | ×1.200 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 3.11 → 3.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAASyracuse Mets · 44 IPFIP 2.65 → 2.98 (+0.33)K% 24.3% → 21.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.29% | — | ×0.880 | 21.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.17% | — | ×1.050 | 10.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.56% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 0.60% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 2.65 → 2.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAugusta GreenJackets · 87 IPFIP 2.61 → 3.47 (+0.86)K% 25.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.740 | 18.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.99% | — | ×1.180 | 8.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.34% | ÷1.082 | ×1.300 | 1.61% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 2.61 → 3.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Bradenton Marauders · 59 IPFIP 5.31 → 6.34 (+1.04)K% 19.9% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.92% | — | ×0.770 | 15.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.89% | — | ×1.150 | 9.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.26% | ÷1.066 | ×1.250 | 6.17% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 5.31 → 6.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AWest Virginia Power · 14 IPFIP 2.53 → 3.30 (+0.77)K% 25.4% → 18.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.42% | — | ×0.740 | 18.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.08% | — | ×1.180 | 6.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.69% | ÷1.181 | ×1.300 | 1.87% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 136).
Result: FIP 2.53 → 3.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.6 | 105 | 19.3% | 10.6% | 1.48 | 5.26 |
| Dave Williams ('07) | 2.0 | 82 | 13.8% | 9.3% | 1.41 | 4.83 |
| Jo-Jo Reyes ('16) | 1.7 | 84 | 14.0% | 9.6% | 1.44 | 6.06 |
| Steve Dunning ('70-'77, -1 WAR*) | 3.1 | 123 | 20.2%* | 11.5%* | 1.71* | 5.25* |
| Ruben Quevedo ('03) | 1.6 | 82 | 15.8% | 11.7% | 1.93 | 6.15 |
| Mike Campbell ('87-'96, -2 WAR*) | 1.2 | 58 | 17.0%* | 9.1%* | 1.96* | 5.82* |
| Jeff Robinson ('87-'92, 0 WAR*) | 3.5 | 118 | 18.3%* | 10.9%* | 1.38* | 5.14* |