Adam Oller

P Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp
Age 32 RHP 6'4" / 225 lbs AAA Svc 5.0 · Ctrl thru 2027 peak 1.4 · 2027
Overview
AAASPArb-3FA 2028
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202227MIX2 levels26211065.525.3016.4%11.8%0.1K 15.6% · BB 11.9% · FIP 5.45
202328MIX2 levels33221346.785.4421.4%10.2%-0.1K 18.7% · BB 9.4% · FIP 5.28
202429MIX2 levels2617955.314.6822.6%11.4%0.8K 20.6% · BB 10.8% · FIP 4.97
202530No MLB games played
202631No MLB games played
2027PROJ32MLBMIA33164.594.7221.5%9.9%0.1
2028PROJ29% MLB33MLBMIA66364.744.9020.7%10.3%0.2
2029PROJ25% MLB34MLBMIA44255.015.1919.8%10.8%0.0
Last 3 seasons WAR 0.9  ·  Next 3 projected WAR 0.3Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2027Service5.000First FA2028
2027Arb-3$6M
Skills · percentileStatcast 2024
FB Velo40
xwOBA vs33
K%28
CompsKenshin Kawakami (age 34) · Nate Long (age 29) · Jarrett Grube (age 33)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 121113vR 105
ERA4.59
FIP4.72
K%21.5%
BB%9.9%
K-BB%11.6%
Proj IP164
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 164 IP
K: -0.8 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-1KBB: -2.2 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-2BBCONTACT: -6.8 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-7CONTACTSTAM: +22.2 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+22STAMTotal WAR: +1.30 (164 IP)+1.3WAR
1.30.20.0272829
Statcast · Contract
Statcast Percentiles
FB Velo
p4093.8
Whiff%
p2321.5%
K%
p2819.0%
xwOBA vs
p330.332
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   Arb-3
MLB Debut   2022
Service   5.000 yrs.days
Team Control Through   2027
First FA Year   2028
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027Arb-3$6M+0.1$0.5M+$0.0M (cut)
Totals $0.0M $0.5M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201621ROK MLEBristol Pirates13955236469769%4.213.3%4.8%8.5%4.2%4.454.86—
201621ROK RAWBristol Pirates13955236469769%4.219.5%3.8%15.7%3.0%4.453.58—
201823MIX MLE2 levels2957332568241517%2.516.0%8.5%7.5%5.4%6.295.79—
201823MIX RAW2 levels2957332568241517%2.520.9%7.4%13.5%4.6%6.294.89—
201924A MLEAugusta GreenJackets17178737293265100%5.118.5%8.2%10.3%1.6%4.023.47—
201924A RAWAugusta GreenJackets17178737293265100%5.125.0%7.0%18.0%1.3%4.022.61—
202126MIX MLE2 levels2323120498138479100%5.223.1%10.2%12.8%2.2%3.453.63—
202126MIX RAW2 levels2323120498138479100%5.227.7%9.4%18.3%1.8%3.452.95—
202227MIX MLE2 levels262110647678561781%4.115.6%11.9%3.6%3.9%5.525.45-0.1
202227MIX RAW2 levels262110647678561781%4.116.4%11.8%4.6%3.6%5.525.30+0.1
202328MIX MLE2 levels3322134625134643067%4.118.7%9.4%9.3%4.7%6.785.28+0.2
202328MIX RAW2 levels3322134625134643067%4.121.4%10.2%11.2%4.8%6.785.44-0.1
202429MIX MLE2 levels26179541293471565%3.720.6%10.8%9.8%4.1%5.314.97+0.5
202429MIX MLE2 levels26179541293471565%3.720.6%10.8%9.8%4.1%5.314.97+0.5
202429MIX RAW2 levels26179541293471565%3.722.6%11.4%11.2%3.6%5.314.68+0.8
▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded)
MLB Career—362313662795732964%3.815.2%11.6%3.5%4.6%6.546.08-1.0
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202732MLBMIA3316681572100%5.321.5%9.9%11.6%3.3%4.594.72+0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202833MLB MLEMIA21211255291095519100%6.020.7%10.3%10.3%3.6%4.845.00+0.6
202934MLB MLEMIA1717100423844616100%5.919.8%10.8%8.9%3.9%5.125.30+0.1
202833MLB CTXMIA663615231165100%6.020.7%10.3%10.3%3.4%4.744.90+0.2
202934MLB CTXMIA442510621114100%6.219.8%10.8%8.9%3.7%5.015.19+0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW46331978841471003872%4.316.6%11.3%5.3%4.3%6.025.49-0.2
/ 200 IP— RAW47342008971491013972%4.316.6%11.3%5.3%4.3%6.025.49-0.2
Career— MLE167114670294454328110968%4.018.4%9.5%8.9%3.7%5.174.78-0.4
/ 200 IP— MLE5034200879162843268%4.018.4%9.5%8.9%3.7%5.174.78-0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 53 IPFIP 4.33 → 4.86 (+0.53)K% 25.6% → 22.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.56%—×0.86021.98%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.21%—×0.90010.09%
HR / BF /BF3.59%÷0.925×1.1004.26%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).

Result: FIP 4.33 → 4.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAATacoma Rainiers · 114 IPFIP 5.03 → 5.04 (+0.02)K% 23.1% → 19.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.09%—×0.86019.86%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.92%—×0.9008.93%
HR / BF /BF4.77%÷1.157×1.1004.53%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 131).

Result: FIP 5.03 → 5.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 32 IPFIP 2.71 → 3.02 (+0.31)K% 23.0% → 20.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.02%—×0.88020.26%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.23%—×1.05012.84%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.075×1.1000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).

Result: FIP 2.71 → 3.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 76 IPFIP 3.11 → 3.99 (+0.87)K% 29.6% → 24.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.60%—×0.81023.97%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.03%—×1.1009.94%
HR / BF /BF2.49%÷0.995×1.2003.01%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).

Result: FIP 3.11 → 3.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAASyracuse Mets · 44 IPFIP 2.65 → 2.98 (+0.33)K% 24.3% → 21.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.29%—×0.88021.38%
BB% (unintentional) /BF10.17%—×1.05010.68%
HR / BF /BF0.56%÷1.039×1.1000.60%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).

Result: FIP 2.65 → 2.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAugusta GreenJackets · 87 IPFIP 2.61 → 3.47 (+0.86)K% 25.0% → 18.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.00%—×0.74018.50%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.99%—×1.1808.25%
HR / BF /BF1.34%÷1.082×1.3001.61%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).

Result: FIP 2.61 → 3.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Bradenton Marauders · 59 IPFIP 5.31 → 6.34 (+1.04)K% 19.9% → 15.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF19.92%—×0.77015.34%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.89%—×1.1509.08%
HR / BF /BF5.26%÷1.066×1.2506.17%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).

Result: FIP 5.31 → 6.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AWest Virginia Power · 14 IPFIP 2.53 → 3.30 (+0.77)K% 25.4% → 18.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.42%—×0.74018.81%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.08%—×1.1806.00%
HR / BF /BF1.69%÷1.181×1.3001.87%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 136).

Result: FIP 2.53 → 3.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player162sIP/yrK%BB%HR/9ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION2.610519.3%10.6%1.485.26
Dave Williams ('07)2.08213.8%9.3%1.414.83
Jo-Jo Reyes ('16)1.78414.0%9.6%1.446.06
Steve Dunning ('70-'77, -1 WAR*)3.112320.2%*11.5%*1.71*5.25*
Ruben Quevedo ('03)1.68215.8%11.7%1.936.15
Mike Campbell ('87-'96, -2 WAR*)1.25817.0%*9.1%*1.96*5.82*
Jeff Robinson ('87-'92, 0 WAR*)3.511818.3%*10.9%*1.38*5.14*