Kade Strowd
P Reno Aces| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 46 | 0 | 51 | 5.44 | 3.74 | 30.7% | 12.1% | — | K 26.5% · BB 12.5% · FIP 4.62 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 54 | 0 | 61 | 3.10 | 2.99 | 25.2% | 10.9% | 1.1 | K 23.0% · BB 10.3% · FIP 3.16 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 47 | 1 | 49 | 5.88 | 4.04 | 20.1% | 14.4% | 0.3 | K 18.0% · BB 11.7% · FIP 3.91 |
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBARI | 37 | 0 | 39 | 4.17 | 4.32 | 22.9% | 12.5% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ80% MLB | 30 | MLBARI | 31 | 0 | 33 | 4.39 | 4.53 | 22.3% | 12.5% | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ84% MLB | 31 | MLBARI | 28 | 0 | 29 | 4.60 | 4.74 | 21.6% | 12.6% | -0.1 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Aberdeen IronBirds | 21 | 1 | 38 | 173 | 45 | 15 | 6 | 5% | 1.8 | 20.0% | 10.0% | 10.1% | 4.2% | 8.05 | 4.96 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ RAW | Aberdeen IronBirds | 21 | 1 | 38 | 173 | 45 | 15 | 6 | 5% | 1.8 | 26.0% | 8.7% | 17.3% | 3.5% | 8.05 | 3.97 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 1 | 17 | 67 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 8% | 1.3 | 26.5% | 11.3% | 15.2% | 4.0% | 1.06 | 4.48 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 1 | 17 | 67 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 8% | 1.3 | 35.8% | 9.0% | 26.9% | 3.0% | 1.06 | 2.86 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Bowie Baysox | 35 | 0 | 55 | 255 | 67 | 32 | 7 | 0% | 1.6 | 21.3% | 13.8% | 7.5% | 2.7% | 5.20 | 4.55 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA RAW | Bowie Baysox | 35 | 0 | 55 | 255 | 67 | 32 | 7 | 0% | 1.6 | 26.3% | 12.5% | 13.7% | 2.7% | 5.20 | 4.06 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 51 | 231 | 71 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.5% | 12.5% | 14.0% | 4.0% | 5.44 | 4.62 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 51 | 231 | 71 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.5% | 12.5% | 14.0% | 4.0% | 5.44 | 4.62 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 46 | 0 | 51 | 231 | 71 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 30.7% | 12.1% | 18.6% | 3.0% | 5.44 | 3.74 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 61 | 258 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 1.3% | 3.10 | 3.16 | +1.0 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 61 | 258 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 1.3% | 3.10 | 3.16 | +1.0 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 61 | 258 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.2% | 10.9% | 14.3% | 1.2% | 3.10 | 2.99 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 47 | 1 | 49 | 229 | 46 | 33 | 3 | 2% | 1.0 | 18.0% | 11.7% | 6.3% | 1.5% | 5.88 | 3.91 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 47 | 1 | 49 | 229 | 46 | 33 | 3 | 2% | 1.0 | 18.0% | 11.7% | 6.3% | 1.5% | 5.88 | 3.91 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 47 | 1 | 49 | 229 | 46 | 33 | 3 | 2% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 14.4% | 5.7% | 1.3% | 5.88 | 4.04 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 27 | 0 | 29 | 119 | 25 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.0% | 15.1% | 5.9% | 0.8% | 1.86 | 3.69 | +0.3 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | ARI | 37 | 0 | 39 | 165 | 38 | 21 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.9% | 12.5% | 10.4% | 2.2% | 4.17 | 4.32 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | ARI | 39 | 0 | 41 | 175 | 39 | 22 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.3% | 12.5% | 9.8% | 2.5% | 4.39 | 4.53 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB MLE | ARI | 32 | 0 | 34 | 143 | 31 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.6% | 12.6% | 9.0% | 2.7% | 4.60 | 4.74 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 32 | MLB MLE | ARI | 27 | 0 | 29 | 121 | 25 | 15 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.9% | 12.8% | 8.1% | 3.0% | 4.82 | 4.98 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | ARI | 31 | 0 | 33 | 139 | 31 | 17 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.3% | 12.5% | 9.8% | 2.5% | 4.39 | 4.53 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB CTX | ARI | 28 | 0 | 29 | 122 | 26 | 15 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.6% | 12.6% | 9.0% | 2.7% | 4.60 | 4.74 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 32 | MLB CTX | ARI | 24 | 0 | 25 | 106 | 22 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.9% | 12.8% | 8.1% | 3.0% | 4.82 | 4.98 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 110 | 0 | 116 | 485 | 104 | 64 | 11 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.5% | 13.2% | 8.3% | 2.2% | 3.90 | 4.19 | +0.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 189 | 0 | 200 | 838 | 180 | 111 | 19 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.5% | 13.2% | 8.3% | 2.2% | 3.90 | 4.19 | +0.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 216 | 3 | 272 | 1213 | 268 | 142 | 33 | 1% | 1.3 | 22.1% | 11.7% | 10.4% | 2.7% | 5.04 | 4.20 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 159 | 2 | 200 | 893 | 198 | 105 | 24 | 1% | 1.3 | 22.1% | 11.7% | 10.4% | 2.7% | 5.04 | 4.20 | +0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAReno Aces · 46 IPFIP 3.75 → 3.91 (+0.16)K% 20.9% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.93% | — | ×0.860 | 18.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.02% | — | ×0.900 | 11.72% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.40% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.53% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.75 → 3.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAANorfolk Tides · 35 IPFIP 2.80 → 3.11 (+0.31)K% 26.8% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.80% | — | ×0.860 | 23.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.80% | — | ×0.900 | 8.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.31% | ÷0.945 | ×1.100 | 1.52% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 2.80 → 3.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAANorfolk Tides · 41 IPFIP 4.23 → 4.62 (+0.39)K% 30.8% → 26.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.77% | — | ×0.860 | 26.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.85% | — | ×0.900 | 12.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.59% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 3.96% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.23 → 4.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABowie Baysox · 10 IPFIP 0.87 → 1.40 (+0.53)K% 30.6% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.56% | — | ×0.810 | 24.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.78% | — | ×1.100 | 3.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.249 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 150).
Result: FIP 0.87 → 1.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABowie Baysox · 55 IPFIP 3.98 → 4.55 (+0.57)K% 26.3% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.27% | — | ×0.810 | 21.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.55% | — | ×1.100 | 13.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.75% | ÷1.208 | ×1.200 | 2.73% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 142).
Result: FIP 3.98 → 4.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 15 IPFIP 3.24 → 4.48 (+1.24)K% 34.4% → 26.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.43% | — | ×0.770 | 26.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.84% | — | ×1.150 | 11.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.28% | ÷1.029 | ×1.250 | 3.98% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 3.24 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 38 IPFIP 3.91 → 4.96 (+1.05)K% 26.0% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.01% | — | ×0.770 | 20.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.67% | — | ×1.150 | 9.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.47% | ÷1.041 | ×1.250 | 4.16% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.91 → 4.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 37 | 22.0% | 13.0% | 0.88 | 4.04 |
| Yorkis Perez ('02) | 1.4 | 40 | 20.8% | 11.8% | 0.93 | 4.44 |
| Sam Freeman ('20) | 1.2 | 47 | 22.6% | 13.3% | 0.65 | 3.58 |
| José Cisnero ('24) | 1.4 | 46 | 24.0% | 11.3% | 1.01 | 4.16 |
| Ray Searage ('81-'90, 4 WAR*) | 1.4 | 41 | 21.0%* | 10.8%* | 0.84* | 3.70* |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |