Nick Bennett
P Nashville Sounds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 24 | 125 | 5.20 | 4.30 | 22.9% | 8.5% | — | K 18.6% · BB 8.7% · FIP 5.03 | |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 3 | 65 | 4.43 | 4.08 | 22.4% | 8.7% | — | K 18.4% · BB 9.9% · FIP 4.83 | |
| 2024 | 26 | AAAMIL | 16 | 4 | 35 | 5.09 | 4.83 | 14.4% | 8.8% | — | K 12.4% · BB 7.9% · FIP 5.13 | |
| 2025 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBMIL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.68 | 4.68 | 18.7% | 8.7% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 30 | MLBMIL | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.75 | 4.82 | 18.8% | 9.1% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | 5 | 3 | 20 | 82 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 60% | 4.1 | 21.7% | 5.8% | 15.9% | 1.6% | 2.21 | 2.85 | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A RAW | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | 5 | 3 | 20 | 82 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 60% | 4.1 | 29.3% | 4.9% | 24.4% | 1.2% | 2.21 | 1.97 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 17 | 103 | 446 | 115 | 42 | 17 | 77% | 4.7 | 20.2% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 4.6% | 4.47 | 5.25 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 17 | 103 | 446 | 115 | 42 | 17 | 77% | 4.7 | 25.8% | 9.4% | 16.4% | 3.8% | 4.47 | 4.24 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 125 | 551 | 126 | 47 | 20 | 92% | 4.8 | 18.6% | 8.7% | 9.9% | 4.4% | 5.20 | 5.03 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 125 | 551 | 126 | 47 | 20 | 92% | 4.8 | 22.9% | 8.5% | 14.3% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 4.30 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 3 | 65 | 286 | 64 | 25 | 9 | 9% | 2.0 | 18.4% | 9.9% | 8.5% | 3.7% | 4.43 | 4.83 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 3 | 65 | 286 | 64 | 25 | 9 | 9% | 2.0 | 22.4% | 8.7% | 13.6% | 3.1% | 4.43 | 4.08 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Nashville Sounds | 16 | 4 | 35 | 160 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 25% | 2.2 | 12.4% | 7.9% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 5.09 | 5.13 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Nashville Sounds | 16 | 4 | 35 | 160 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 25% | 2.2 | 12.4% | 7.9% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 5.09 | 5.13 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA RAW | Nashville Sounds | 16 | 4 | 35 | 160 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 25% | 2.2 | 14.4% | 8.8% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 5.09 | 4.83 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | MIL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 18.7% | 8.7% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.68 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIL | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 18.8% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 3.2% | 4.75 | 4.82 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIL | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 18.8% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 3.2% | 4.75 | 4.82 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 7.4 | 18.8% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 3.2% | 4.75 | 4.44 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 29 | 29 | 200 | 844 | 163 | 82 | 27 | 100% | 6.8 | 18.8% | 9.1% | 9.7% | 3.2% | 4.75 | 4.44 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 102 | 51 | 348 | 1525 | 283 | 141 | 62 | 50% | 3.4 | 18.6% | 9.2% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 4.66 | 4.95 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 59 | 29 | 200 | 876 | 163 | 81 | 36 | 50% | 3.4 | 18.6% | 9.2% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 4.66 | 4.95 | +1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAANashville Sounds · 35 IPFIP 4.71 → 5.13 (+0.42)K% 14.4% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.37% | — | ×0.860 | 12.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.75% | — | ×0.900 | 7.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.12% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 3.78% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 4.71 → 5.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABiloxi Shuckers · 64 IPFIP 4.11 → 4.83 (+0.72)K% 22.7% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.74% | — | ×0.810 | 18.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.03% | — | ×1.100 | 9.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.25% | ÷1.055 | ×1.200 | 3.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 4.11 → 4.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AABiloxi Shuckers · 124 IPFIP 4.18 → 5.03 (+0.85)K% 23.0% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.02% | — | ×0.810 | 18.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.92% | — | ×1.100 | 8.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.68% | ÷1.012 | ×1.200 | 4.37% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 4.18 → 5.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 56 IPFIP 3.17 → 4.01 (+0.84)K% 29.0% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.03% | — | ×0.770 | 22.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.66% | — | ×1.150 | 8.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.82% | ÷1.155 | ×1.250 | 3.06% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 131).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 4.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AABiloxi Shuckers · 46 IPFIP 5.51 → 6.81 (+1.30)K% 21.7% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.72% | — | ×0.810 | 17.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.62% | — | ×1.100 | 12.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.05% | ÷0.929 | ×1.200 | 6.52% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 5.51 → 6.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AWisconsin Timber Rattlers · 20 IPFIP 1.92 → 2.85 (+0.94)K% 29.3% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.27% | — | ×0.740 | 21.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.88% | — | ×1.180 | 5.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.22% | ÷1.022 | ×1.300 | 1.55% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 1.92 → 2.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).