Tayler Scott
P Gwinnett Stripers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32 | MLBHOU | 62 | 1 | 69 | 2.23 | 3.84 | 25.2% | 12.1% | 0.6 | |
| 2025 | 33 | MIX2 levels | 47 | 0 | 50 | 6.12 | 4.54 | 21.5% | 11.6% | 0.0 | K 19.9% · BB 11.2% · FIP 4.56 |
| 2026 | 34 | AAAATL | 14 | 1 | 15 | 9.20 | 5.15 | 24.1% | 17.7% | — | K 20.7% · BB 15.9% · FIP 4.90 |
| 2027PROJ | 35 | MLBATL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.78 | 5.08 | 21.4% | 13.7% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJMLE | 36 | MLBATL | — | — | 0 | 5.18 | 5.44 | 20.4% | 14.3% | — | |
| 2029PROJMLE | 37 | MLBATL | — | — | 0 | 5.58 | 5.84 | 19.3% | 15.0% | — |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 1 | 54 | 227 | 48 | 26 | 4 | 4% | 2.1 | 16.7% | 12.7% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 3.83 | 4.48 | — |
| 2015 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 1 | 54 | 227 | 48 | 26 | 4 | 4% | 2.1 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.7% | 1.8% | 3.83 | 3.73 | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA MLE | Biloxi Shuckers | 24 | 0 | 27 | 114 | 21 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 14.9% | 13.5% | 1.4% | 2.5% | 4.39 | 4.95 | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA RAW | Biloxi Shuckers | 24 | 0 | 27 | 114 | 21 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.4% | 12.3% | 6.1% | 2.6% | 4.39 | 4.56 | — |
| 2017 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 75 | 332 | 76 | 38 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 18.8% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 1.7% | 3.25 | 4.01 | — |
| 2017 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 75 | 332 | 76 | 38 | 6 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 1.8% | 3.25 | 3.64 | — |
| 2018 | 26 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 44 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 52 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 18.0% | 9.9% | 8.1% | 1.8% | 3.26 | 3.81 | — |
| 2018 | 26 | AAA RAW | Round Rock Express | 44 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 52 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.5% | 9.4% | 11.0% | 1.6% | 3.26 | 3.43 | — |
| 2019 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 46 | 2 | 67 | 306 | 82 | 32 | 10 | 4% | 1.5 | 24.1% | 10.8% | 13.3% | 3.4% | 6.95 | 4.29 | +0.2 |
| 2019 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 46 | 2 | 67 | 306 | 82 | 32 | 10 | 4% | 1.5 | 26.8% | 10.5% | 16.3% | 3.3% | 6.95 | 4.02 | +0.4 |
| 2022 | 30 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 56 | 251 | 69 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.8% | 8.7% | 16.1% | 2.5% | 5.01 | 3.47 | +0.7 |
| 2022 | 30 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 56 | 251 | 69 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 27.5% | 8.4% | 19.1% | 2.4% | 5.01 | 3.15 | +0.9 |
| 2023 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 53 | 2 | 56 | 238 | 61 | 20 | 4 | 4% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 7.9% | 15.1% | 1.8% | 2.89 | 3.17 | +0.9 |
| 2023 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 53 | 2 | 56 | 238 | 61 | 20 | 4 | 4% | 1.1 | 25.6% | 8.4% | 17.2% | 1.7% | 2.89 | 2.92 | +1.1 |
| 2024 | 32 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 62 | 1 | 69 | 282 | 71 | 34 | 7 | 2% | 1.1 | 25.2% | 12.1% | 13.1% | 2.6% | 2.23 | 3.90 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 32 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 62 | 1 | 69 | 282 | 71 | 34 | 7 | 2% | 1.1 | 25.2% | 12.1% | 13.1% | 2.6% | 2.23 | 3.90 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 32 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 62 | 1 | 69 | 282 | 71 | 34 | 7 | 2% | 1.1 | 25.2% | 12.1% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 2.23 | 3.84 | +0.6 |
| 2025 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 47 | 0 | 50 | 233 | 50 | 27 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 11.2% | 8.7% | 3.1% | 6.12 | 4.56 | -0.0 |
| 2025 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 47 | 0 | 50 | 233 | 50 | 27 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 11.2% | 8.7% | 3.1% | 6.12 | 4.56 | -0.0 |
| 2025 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 47 | 0 | 50 | 233 | 50 | 27 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.5% | 11.6% | 9.9% | 3.0% | 6.12 | 4.54 | +0.0 |
| 2026 | 34 | AAA MLE | Gwinnett Stripers | 14 | 1 | 15 | 79 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 7% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 15.9% | 4.7% | 2.8% | 9.20 | 4.90 | — |
| 2026 | 34 | AAA MLE | Gwinnett Stripers | 14 | 1 | 15 | 79 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 7% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 15.9% | 4.7% | 2.8% | 9.20 | 4.90 | — |
| 2026 | 34 | AAA RAW | Gwinnett Stripers | 14 | 1 | 15 | 79 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 7% | 1.0 | 24.1% | 17.7% | 6.3% | 2.5% | 9.20 | 5.15 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 125 | 5 | 142 | 656 | 139 | 77 | 23 | 4% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 11.7% | 9.5% | 3.5% | 5.51 | 4.87 | -0.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 35 | MLB | ATL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 13.7% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.78 | 5.08 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 36 | MLB MLE | ATL | 34 | 0 | 36 | 152 | 31 | 22 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.4% | 14.3% | 6.1% | 3.4% | 5.18 | 5.44 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 37 | MLB MLE | ATL | 25 | 0 | 26 | 110 | 21 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.3% | 15.0% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 5.58 | 5.84 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 36 | MLB CTX | ATL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | 14.3% | 6.1% | 3.4% | 5.18 | 5.44 | — |
| 2029 | 37 | MLB CTX | ATL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.3% | 15.0% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 5.58 | 5.84 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 125 | 5 | 142 | 658 | 139 | 77 | 23 | 4% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 11.7% | 9.4% | 3.5% | 5.51 | 4.72 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 176 | 7 | 200 | 924 | 195 | 108 | 32 | 4% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 11.7% | 9.4% | 3.5% | 5.51 | 4.72 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 415 | 7 | 528 | 2316 | 488 | 257 | 56 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.1% | 11.1% | 9.9% | 2.4% | 4.29 | 4.05 | -1.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 157 | 3 | 200 | 877 | 185 | 97 | 21 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.1% | 11.1% | 9.9% | 2.4% | 4.29 | 4.05 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 15 IPFIP 4.70 → 4.90 (+0.20)K% 24.1% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.05% | — | ×0.860 | 20.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.72% | — | ×0.900 | 15.95% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.78% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.70 → 4.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASugar Land Space Cowboys · 23 IPFIP 2.59 → 2.86 (+0.28)K% 26.3% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.26% | — | ×0.860 | 22.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×0.900 | 8.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.01% | ÷0.961 | ×1.100 | 1.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 2.59 → 2.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 38 IPFIP 2.00 → 2.29 (+0.28)K% 29.3% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.33% | — | ×0.860 | 25.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.00% | — | ×0.900 | 7.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.67% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 0.74% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 2.00 → 2.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 44 IPFIP 3.06 → 3.49 (+0.43)K% 29.2% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.17% | — | ×0.880 | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.81% | — | ×1.050 | 8.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.60% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 2.76% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 3.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAANorfolk Tides · 51 IPFIP 2.68 → 3.32 (+0.63)K% 31.9% → 28.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.92% | — | ×0.880 | 28.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.86% | — | ×1.050 | 10.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.88% | ÷0.889 | ×1.100 | 2.32% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 2.68 → 3.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAARound Rock Express · 61 IPFIP 3.43 → 3.81 (+0.37)K% 20.5% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.47% | — | ×0.880 | 18.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.45% | — | ×1.050 | 9.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.57% | ÷0.978 | ×1.100 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 3.43 → 3.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AABiloxi Shuckers · 62 IPFIP 3.29 → 3.73 (+0.44)K% 23.3% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.33% | — | ×0.810 | 18.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.22% | — | ×1.100 | 13.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.11% | ÷1.393 | ×1.200 | 0.96% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 179).
Result: FIP 3.29 → 3.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAARound Rock Express · 13 IPFIP 5.01 → 5.23 (+0.22)K% 21.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.97% | — | ×0.880 | 18.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.06% | — | ×1.050 | 8.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.84% | ÷1.117 | ×1.100 | 4.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 5.01 → 5.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.3 | 52 | 20.9% | 13.1% | 1.33 | 5.32 |
| Richie Lewis ('98) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.1% | 14.1% | 1.38 | 4.88 |
| Doug Creek ('05) | 1.4 | 58 | 22.2% | 15.1% | 1.52 | 5.32 |
| Paul Spoljaric ('00) | 1.4 | 69 | 22.1% | 12.9% | 1.33 | 5.52 |
| Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 46 | 18.3%* | 11.2%* | 1.27* | 5.03* |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |