Dallas Keuchel
P Las Vegas Aviators| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36 | MIX2 levels | 17 | 17 | 88 | 4.21 | 4.78 | 15.3% | 8.2% | 0.6 | K 13.5% · BB 7.6% · FIP 4.78 |
| 2025 | 37 | AAAKC | 7 | 7 | 36 | 3.53 | 3.52 | 19.2% | 7.7% | — | K 16.5% · BB 6.9% · FIP 3.74 |
| 2026 | 38 | AAAOAK | 7 | 7 | 25 | 6.48 | 6.38 | 17.2% | 16.4% | — | K 14.8% · BB 14.7% · FIP 6.32 |
| 2027PROJ | 39 | MLBOAK | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.97 | 5.41 | 13.8% | 10.4% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ | 40 | MLBOAK | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5.49 | 5.84 | 12.6% | 11.2% | -0.1 |
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 24 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 16 | 16 | 85 | 377 | 38 | 38 | 14 | 100% | 5.3 | 10.1% | 10.1% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 5.27 | 5.62 | -0.2 |
| 2012 | 24 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 16 | 16 | 85 | 377 | 38 | 38 | 14 | 100% | 5.3 | 10.1% | 10.1% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 5.27 | 5.68 | -0.3 |
| 2013 | 25 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 31 | 22 | 154 | 682 | 123 | 49 | 20 | 71% | 5.0 | 18.0% | 7.2% | 10.9% | 3.0% | 5.15 | 4.14 | +2.3 |
| 2013 | 25 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 31 | 22 | 154 | 682 | 123 | 49 | 20 | 71% | 5.0 | 18.0% | 7.2% | 10.9% | 2.9% | 5.15 | 4.15 | +2.3 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 29 | 29 | 200 | 808 | 146 | 46 | 11 | 100% | 6.9 | 18.1% | 5.7% | 12.4% | 1.4% | 2.92 | 3.06 | +5.9 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 29 | 29 | 200 | 808 | 146 | 46 | 11 | 100% | 6.9 | 18.1% | 5.7% | 12.4% | 1.4% | 2.92 | 3.04 | +6.0 |
| 2015 | 27 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 33 | 33 | 232 | 911 | 216 | 51 | 17 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.7% | 5.6% | 18.1% | 1.9% | 2.48 | 2.86 | +7.6 |
| 2015 | 27 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 33 | 33 | 232 | 911 | 216 | 51 | 17 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.7% | 5.6% | 18.1% | 1.9% | 2.48 | 2.85 | +7.6 |
| 2016 | 28 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 26 | 26 | 168 | 701 | 144 | 47 | 20 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.5% | 6.7% | 13.8% | 2.9% | 4.55 | 3.82 | +3.2 |
| 2016 | 28 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 26 | 26 | 168 | 701 | 144 | 47 | 20 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.5% | 6.7% | 13.8% | 2.9% | 4.55 | 3.77 | +3.3 |
| 2017 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 149 | 596 | 128 | 48 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.4% | 8.0% | 13.4% | 2.6% | 2.85 | 3.76 | +2.9 |
| 2017 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 149 | 596 | 128 | 48 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.5% | 8.1% | 13.4% | 2.5% | 2.85 | 3.66 | +3.1 |
| 2018 | 30 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 34 | 34 | 205 | 874 | 153 | 58 | 18 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.5% | 6.6% | 10.9% | 2.1% | 3.74 | 3.62 | +4.4 |
| 2018 | 30 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 34 | 34 | 205 | 874 | 153 | 58 | 18 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.5% | 6.6% | 10.9% | 2.1% | 3.74 | 3.60 | +4.5 |
| 2019 | 31 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 21 | 21 | 127 | 541 | 104 | 40 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.7% | 7.8% | 10.9% | 3.3% | 3.55 | 4.31 | +1.6 |
| 2019 | 31 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 21 | 21 | 127 | 541 | 104 | 40 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.2% | 7.4% | 11.8% | 3.0% | 3.55 | 4.05 | +2.0 |
| 2020 | 32 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 11 | 11 | 63 | 257 | 42 | 17 | 2 | 100% | 5.8 | 16.3% | 6.6% | 9.7% | 0.8% | 1.99 | 2.98 | +1.9 |
| 2020 | 32 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 11 | 11 | 63 | 257 | 42 | 17 | 2 | 100% | 5.8 | 16.3% | 6.6% | 9.7% | 0.8% | 1.99 | 2.99 | +1.9 |
| 2021 | 33 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 30 | 162 | 720 | 95 | 58 | 25 | 94% | 5.1 | 13.2% | 8.1% | 5.1% | 3.4% | 5.28 | 4.88 | +1.0 |
| 2021 | 33 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 30 | 162 | 720 | 95 | 58 | 25 | 94% | 5.1 | 13.2% | 8.1% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 5.28 | 5.01 | +0.7 |
| 2022 | 34 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 20 | 96 | 444 | 84 | 42 | 12 | 100% | 4.8 | 17.1% | 9.7% | 7.4% | 2.6% | 6.94 | 4.29 | +1.3 |
| 2022 | 34 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 20 | 96 | 444 | 84 | 42 | 12 | 100% | 4.8 | 18.9% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 2.7% | 6.94 | 4.29 | +1.3 |
| 2023 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 12 | 70 | 304 | 53 | 30 | 6 | 75% | 4.4 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 6.7% | 2.1% | 3.75 | 4.07 | +1.1 |
| 2023 | 35 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 12 | 70 | 304 | 53 | 30 | 6 | 75% | 4.4 | 17.4% | 9.9% | 7.6% | 2.0% | 3.75 | 3.99 | +1.2 |
| 2024 | 36 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 17 | 88 | 367 | 56 | 30 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 13.5% | 7.6% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 4.21 | 4.78 | +0.6 |
| 2024 | 36 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 17 | 88 | 367 | 56 | 30 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 13.5% | 7.6% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 4.21 | 4.78 | +0.6 |
| 2024 | 36 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 17 | 17 | 88 | 367 | 56 | 30 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 15.3% | 8.2% | 7.1% | 3.5% | 4.21 | 4.78 | +0.6 |
| 2025 | 37 | AAA MLE | Omaha Storm Chasers | 7 | 7 | 36 | 156 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 5.1 | 16.5% | 6.9% | 9.6% | 2.1% | 3.53 | 3.74 | — |
| 2025 | 37 | AAA MLE | Omaha Storm Chasers | 7 | 7 | 36 | 156 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 5.1 | 16.5% | 6.9% | 9.6% | 2.1% | 3.53 | 3.74 | — |
| 2025 | 37 | AAA RAW | Omaha Storm Chasers | 7 | 7 | 36 | 156 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.2% | 7.7% | 11.5% | 1.9% | 3.53 | 3.52 | — |
| 2026 | 38 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | 7 | 7 | 25 | 116 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 3.6 | 14.8% | 14.7% | 0.1% | 4.7% | 6.48 | 6.32 | — |
| 2026 | 38 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | 7 | 7 | 25 | 116 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 3.6 | 14.8% | 14.7% | 0.1% | 4.7% | 6.48 | 6.32 | — |
| 2026 | 38 | AAA RAW | Las Vegas Aviators | 7 | 7 | 25 | 116 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 3.6 | 17.2% | 16.4% | 0.9% | 4.3% | 6.48 | 6.38 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 282 | 267 | 1642 | 6955 | 1254 | 504 | 175 | 95% | 5.8 | 18.0% | 7.2% | 10.8% | 2.5% | 4.04 | 3.88 | +30.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 39 | MLB | OAK | 1 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 6.0 | 13.8% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 4.97 | 5.41 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 40 | MLB MLE | OAK | 4 | 4 | 26 | 111 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 100% | 6.6 | 12.6% | 11.2% | 1.4% | 3.7% | 5.49 | 5.84 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 40 | MLB CTX | OAK | 4 | 4 | 26 | 110 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 100% | 6.5 | 12.6% | 11.2% | 1.4% | 3.7% | 5.49 | 5.84 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 286 | 271 | 1669 | 7066 | 1268 | 516 | 179 | 95% | 5.8 | 17.9% | 7.3% | 10.6% | 2.5% | 4.06 | 3.90 | +30.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 33 | 200 | 847 | 152 | 62 | 21 | 95% | 5.8 | 17.9% | 7.3% | 10.6% | 2.5% | 4.06 | 3.90 | +3.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 324 | 309 | 1858 | 7854 | 1403 | 582 | 202 | 95% | 5.7 | 17.9% | 7.4% | 10.5% | 2.6% | 3.97 | 3.94 | +29.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 35 | 33 | 200 | 845 | 151 | 63 | 22 | 95% | 5.7 | 17.9% | 7.4% | 10.5% | 2.6% | 3.97 | 3.94 | +3.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 25 IPFIP 6.08 → 6.32 (+0.23)K% 17.2% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.24% | — | ×0.860 | 14.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.38% | — | ×0.900 | 14.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.31% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 4.74% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 6.08 → 6.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 36 IPFIP 3.51 → 3.74 (+0.23)K% 19.2% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.23% | — | ×0.860 | 16.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.69% | — | ×0.900 | 6.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.92% | ÷1.003 | ×1.100 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 3.51 → 3.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAATacoma Rainiers · 71 IPFIP 4.65 → 4.67 (+0.02)K% 15.6% → 13.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.62% | — | ×0.860 | 13.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.64% | — | ×0.900 | 6.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.47% | ÷1.142 | ×1.100 | 3.34% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).
Result: FIP 4.65 → 4.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASt. Paul Saints · 32 IPFIP 3.71 → 3.96 (+0.25)K% 21.2% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.21% | — | ×0.860 | 18.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×0.900 | 8.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷1.009 | ×1.100 | 2.48% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 3.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAARound Rock Express · 23 IPFIP 3.19 → 3.60 (+0.41)K% 24.2% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.18% | — | ×0.880 | 21.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.09% | — | ×1.050 | 12.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.10% | ÷0.957 | ×1.100 | 1.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 3.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKACL D-backs Black · 12 IPFIP 0.74 → 1.78 (+1.05)K% 34.0% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.00% | — | ×0.680 | 23.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.00% | — | ×1.250 | 5.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.948 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 0.74 → 1.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAMississippi Braves · 7 IPFIP 2.42 → 2.67 (+0.25)K% 12.9% → 10.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.90% | — | ×0.810 | 10.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.23% | — | ×1.100 | 3.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 80).
Result: FIP 2.42 → 2.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ARome Braves · 7 IPFIP 0.35 → 1.30 (+0.96)K% 39.1% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.13% | — | ×0.740 | 28.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.35% | — | ×1.180 | 5.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.851 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 70).
Result: FIP 0.35 → 1.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 8.6 | 122 | 17.8% | 7.5% | 0.99 | 4.08 |
| Bob Ojeda ('80-'94, 22 WAR*) | 9.4 | 135 | 19.1%* | 8.5%* | 0.97* | 4.08* |
| Ray Washburn ('61-'70, 12 WAR*) | 6.0 | 121 | 17.6%* | 7.5%* | 1.17* | 4.17* |
| Denny Neagle ('03) | 9.5 | 145 | 17.6% | 7.4% | 1.19 | 4.24 |
| Bruce Kison ('71-'85, 16 WAR*) | 9.0 | 121 | 20.4%* | 8.5%* | 1.10* | 4.16* |
| Gavin Floyd ('16) | 6.2 | 104 | 18.4% | 7.8% | 1.15 | 4.37 |
| Wade Miley ('25) | 8.8 | 146 | 18.2% | 8.1% | 1.01 | 4.09 |