Wade Miley
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 36 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 24 | 125 | 3.02 | 4.35 | 16.5% | 7.6% | 1.5 | K 16.1% · BB 7.8% · FIP 4.43 | |
| 2024 | 37 | MIX2 levels | 3 | 3 | 10 | 5.40 | 5.20 | 11.6% | 14.0% | 0.0 | K 11.6% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.16 | |
| 2025 | 38 | MIX4 levels | 11 | 10 | 33 | 7.91 | 5.89 | 15.3% | 7.6% | -0.2 | K 11.0% · BB 8.1% · FIP 4.49 | |
| 2026 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 40 | MLBCIN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.99 | 5.42 | 10.0% | 9.0% | -0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ | 41 | MLBCIN | 2 | 2 | 15 | 5.60 | 5.90 | 10.0% | 9.7% | -0.1 | ||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 27 | MLBARI | 69 | .158/.200/.158 | 0 | 0 | -14 | -0.8 | |
| 2018 | 31 | MLBMIL | 28 | .185/.214/.185 | 0 | 0 | 13 | -0.2 | |
| 2021 | 34 | MLBCIN | 59 | .185/.228/.241 | 0 | 0 | 27 | -0.4 | |
| 2022 | 35 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 36 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 37 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 38 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 39 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 24 | MLB MLE | Arizona Diamondbacks | 8 | 7 | 40 | 180 | 25 | 18 | 6 | 88% | 5.0 | 13.9% | 10.0% | 3.9% | 3.3% | 4.50 | 5.01 | +0.2 |
| 2011 | 24 | MLB RAW | Arizona Diamondbacks | 8 | 7 | 40 | 180 | 25 | 18 | 6 | 88% | 5.0 | 13.9% | 10.0% | 3.9% | 3.3% | 4.50 | 5.15 | +0.1 |
| 2012 | 25 | MLB MLE | Arizona Diamondbacks | 32 | 29 | 195 | 807 | 144 | 37 | 14 | 91% | 6.1 | 17.8% | 4.6% | 13.3% | 1.7% | 3.33 | 3.12 | +5.6 |
| 2012 | 25 | MLB RAW | Arizona Diamondbacks | 32 | 29 | 195 | 807 | 144 | 37 | 14 | 91% | 6.1 | 17.8% | 4.6% | 13.3% | 1.7% | 3.33 | 3.13 | +5.5 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB MLE | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 33 | 203 | 847 | 147 | 62 | 21 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.4% | 7.3% | 10.0% | 2.5% | 3.55 | 3.91 | +3.6 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB RAW | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 33 | 203 | 847 | 147 | 62 | 21 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.4% | 7.3% | 10.0% | 2.5% | 3.55 | 3.91 | +3.6 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB MLE | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 33 | 201 | 866 | 183 | 72 | 23 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.1% | 8.3% | 12.8% | 2.6% | 4.34 | 3.81 | +3.9 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB RAW | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 33 | 201 | 866 | 183 | 72 | 23 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.1% | 8.3% | 12.8% | 2.7% | 4.34 | 3.84 | +3.8 |
| 2015 | 28 | MLB MLE | Boston Red Sox | 32 | 32 | 194 | 831 | 147 | 64 | 17 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.7% | 7.7% | 10.0% | 2.1% | 4.46 | 3.73 | +3.9 |
| 2015 | 28 | MLB RAW | Boston Red Sox | 32 | 32 | 194 | 831 | 147 | 64 | 17 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.7% | 7.7% | 10.0% | 2.0% | 4.46 | 3.71 | +4.0 |
| 2016 | 29 | MLB MLE | Baltimore Orioles | 30 | 30 | 166 | 711 | 137 | 48 | 25 | 100% | 5.5 | 19.3% | 6.8% | 12.5% | 3.2% | 5.37 | 4.07 | +2.6 |
| 2016 | 29 | MLB RAW | Baltimore Orioles | 30 | 30 | 166 | 711 | 137 | 48 | 25 | 100% | 5.5 | 19.3% | 6.8% | 12.5% | 3.5% | 5.37 | 4.27 | +2.2 |
| 2017 | 30 | MLB MLE | Baltimore Orioles | 32 | 32 | 157 | 728 | 142 | 92 | 25 | 100% | 4.9 | 19.5% | 12.6% | 6.9% | 3.1% | 5.61 | 4.76 | +1.2 |
| 2017 | 30 | MLB RAW | Baltimore Orioles | 32 | 32 | 157 | 728 | 142 | 92 | 25 | 100% | 4.9 | 19.5% | 12.6% | 6.9% | 3.4% | 5.61 | 5.11 | +0.5 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 106 | 436 | 78 | 30 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 16.7% | 7.0% | 9.7% | 1.4% | 2.80 | 3.36 | +2.6 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 106 | 436 | 78 | 30 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 17.9% | 6.9% | 11.0% | 1.4% | 2.80 | 3.21 | +2.8 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 33 | 33 | 167 | 720 | 140 | 61 | 23 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.4% | 8.5% | 11.0% | 3.3% | 3.98 | 4.33 | +2.1 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 33 | 33 | 167 | 720 | 140 | 61 | 23 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.4% | 8.5% | 11.0% | 3.2% | 3.98 | 4.31 | +2.1 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB MLE | Cincinnati Reds | 6 | 4 | 14 | 67 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 67% | 2.4 | 17.9% | 13.4% | 4.5% | 1.4% | 5.65 | 4.05 | +0.2 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB RAW | Cincinnati Reds | 6 | 4 | 14 | 67 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 67% | 2.4 | 17.9% | 13.4% | 4.5% | 1.5% | 5.65 | 4.22 | +0.2 |
| 2021 | 34 | MLB MLE | Cincinnati Reds | 28 | 28 | 163 | 690 | 125 | 50 | 17 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.1% | 7.2% | 10.9% | 2.3% | 3.37 | 3.74 | +3.3 |
| 2021 | 34 | MLB RAW | Cincinnati Reds | 28 | 28 | 163 | 690 | 125 | 50 | 17 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.1% | 7.2% | 10.9% | 2.5% | 3.37 | 3.84 | +3.1 |
| 2022 | 35 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 15 | 14 | 59 | 253 | 43 | 19 | 4 | 93% | 3.9 | 17.3% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 1.9% | 3.66 | 3.71 | +1.2 |
| 2022 | 35 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 15 | 14 | 59 | 253 | 43 | 19 | 4 | 93% | 3.9 | 17.0% | 7.5% | 9.5% | 1.6% | 3.66 | 3.49 | +1.4 |
| 2023 | 36 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 125 | 510 | 84 | 39 | 16 | 100% | 5.2 | 16.1% | 7.8% | 8.4% | 3.1% | 3.02 | 4.43 | +1.4 |
| 2023 | 36 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 125 | 510 | 84 | 39 | 16 | 100% | 5.2 | 16.5% | 7.6% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 3.02 | 4.35 | +1.5 |
| 2024 | 37 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 10 | 43 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 11.6% | 14.0% | -2.3% | 2.3% | 5.40 | 5.16 | +0.0 |
| 2024 | 37 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 10 | 43 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 11.6% | 14.0% | -2.3% | 2.3% | 5.40 | 5.16 | +0.0 |
| 2024 | 37 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 10 | 43 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 11.6% | 14.0% | -2.3% | 2.3% | 5.40 | 5.20 | +0.0 |
| 2025 | 38 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 11 | 10 | 33 | 157 | 24 | 12 | 8 | 91% | 3.0 | 11.0% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 7.91 | 4.49 | +0.4 |
| 2025 | 38 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 11 | 10 | 33 | 157 | 24 | 12 | 8 | 91% | 3.0 | 11.0% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 7.91 | 4.49 | +0.4 |
| 2025 | 38 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 11 | 10 | 33 | 157 | 24 | 12 | 8 | 91% | 3.0 | 15.3% | 7.6% | 7.6% | 5.1% | 7.91 | 5.89 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 320 | 312 | 1757 | 7519 | 1368 | 601 | 198 | 98% | 5.5 | 18.2% | 8.0% | 10.2% | 2.6% | 4.09 | 4.03 | +28.6 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 40 | MLB | CIN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 10.0% | 9.0% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 4.99 | 5.42 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 41 | MLB MLE | CIN | 2 | 2 | 15 | 63 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 7.5 | 10.0% | 9.7% | 0.3% | 3.4% | 5.45 | 5.75 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 41 | MLB CTX | CIN | 2 | 2 | 15 | 63 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 7.5 | 10.0% | 9.7% | 0.3% | 3.7% | 5.60 | 5.90 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 322 | 314 | 1772 | 7582 | 1374 | 607 | 200 | 98% | 5.5 | 18.1% | 8.0% | 10.1% | 2.6% | 4.10 | 4.03 | +28.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 35 | 200 | 856 | 155 | 68 | 23 | 98% | 5.5 | 18.1% | 8.0% | 10.1% | 2.6% | 4.10 | 4.03 | +3.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 343 | 335 | 1834 | 7846 | 1423 | 622 | 198 | 98% | 5.3 | 18.1% | 7.9% | 10.2% | 2.5% | 4.12 | 3.96 | +28.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 37 | 37 | 200 | 856 | 155 | 68 | 22 | 98% | 5.3 | 18.1% | 7.9% | 10.2% | 2.5% | 4.12 | 3.96 | +3.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAALouisville Bats · 14 IPFIP 2.97 → 3.02 (+0.05)K% 11.1% → 9.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.11% | — | ×0.860 | 9.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.35% | — | ×0.900 | 5.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.901 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 80).
Result: FIP 2.97 → 3.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Dayton Dragons · 6 IPFIP 8.00 → 9.30 (+1.30)K% 25.8% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.81% | — | ×0.770 | 19.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.150 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 12.90% | ÷1.124 | ×1.250 | 14.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 8.00 → 9.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABiloxi Shuckers · 5 IPFIP 1.62 → 2.09 (+0.46)K% 25.0% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.810 | 20.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.100 | 5.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.055 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 1.62 → 2.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAIowa Cubs · 16 IPFIP 3.17 → 3.48 (+0.32)K% 18.8% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.75% | — | ×0.880 | 16.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.25% | — | ×1.050 | 6.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.56% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 1.73% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+South Bend Cubs · 6 IPFIP 2.68 → 2.94 (+0.26)K% 10.0% → 7.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 10.00% | — | ×0.770 | 7.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.33% | — | ×1.150 | 3.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.938 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 2.68 → 2.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AABiloxi Shuckers · 25 IPFIP 2.88 → 3.59 (+0.70)K% 28.6% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.810 | 23.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.08% | — | ×1.100 | 4.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.06% | ÷1.078 | ×1.200 | 3.41% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 2.88 → 3.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).