Casey Kelly
P Reno Aces| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 31 | 27 | 160 | 4.51 | 4.07 | 18.3% | 5.9% | 2.5 | K 16.4% · BB 6.2% · FIP 4.41 | |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 8 | 6 | 32 | 6.75 | 5.88 | 14.8% | 9.4% | -0.2 | K 12.1% · BB 9.1% · FIP 5.78 | |
| 2025 | 35 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 20 | 117 | 5.55 | 4.87 | 11.4% | 9.1% | 0.7 | K 9.9% · BB 8.1% · FIP 5.06 | |
| 2026 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 37 | MLBARI | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5.07 | 5.02 | 14.9% | 8.6% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJMLE | 38 | MLBARI | — | — | 0 | 5.12 | 5.27 | 14.6% | 9.4% | — | ||
| 2029PROJMLE | 39 | MLBARI | — | — | 0 | 5.38 | 5.61 | 14.1% | 10.1% | — | ||
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 22 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 6 | 6 | 29 | 136 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 100% | 4.8 | 19.1% | 6.6% | 12.5% | 3.6% | 6.21 | 4.29 | +0.4 |
| 2012 | 22 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 6 | 6 | 29 | 136 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 100% | 4.8 | 19.1% | 6.6% | 12.5% | 3.7% | 6.21 | 4.48 | +0.3 |
| 2015 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 34 | 19 | 109 | 498 | 81 | 40 | 8 | 56% | 3.2 | 13.6% | 8.7% | 4.9% | 2.1% | 5.45 | 4.21 | +1.5 |
| 2015 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 34 | 19 | 109 | 498 | 81 | 40 | 8 | 56% | 3.2 | 16.3% | 8.0% | 8.2% | 1.6% | 5.45 | 3.67 | +2.3 |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 13 | 96 | 404 | 54 | 32 | 7 | 52% | 3.8 | 12.0% | 8.3% | 3.7% | 1.7% | 4.05 | 4.08 | +1.5 |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 13 | 96 | 404 | 54 | 32 | 7 | 52% | 3.8 | 13.4% | 7.9% | 5.4% | 1.7% | 4.05 | 3.93 | +1.7 |
| 2017 | 27 | AAA MLE | Sacramento River Cats | 19 | 18 | 101 | 445 | 82 | 36 | 16 | 95% | 5.3 | 16.2% | 8.5% | 7.7% | 4.4% | 4.46 | 5.25 | — |
| 2017 | 27 | AAA RAW | Sacramento River Cats | 19 | 18 | 101 | 445 | 82 | 36 | 16 | 95% | 5.3 | 18.4% | 8.1% | 10.3% | 3.6% | 4.46 | 4.60 | — |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 27 | 160 | 694 | 127 | 41 | 22 | 87% | 5.2 | 16.4% | 6.2% | 10.2% | 3.5% | 4.51 | 4.41 | +1.8 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 27 | 160 | 694 | 127 | 41 | 22 | 87% | 5.2 | 18.3% | 5.9% | 12.4% | 3.2% | 4.51 | 4.07 | +2.5 |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 32 | 149 | 22 | 14 | 7 | 75% | 4.0 | 12.1% | 9.1% | 3.0% | 4.6% | 6.75 | 5.78 | -0.1 |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 32 | 149 | 22 | 14 | 7 | 75% | 4.0 | 12.1% | 9.1% | 3.0% | 4.6% | 6.75 | 5.78 | -0.1 |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 32 | 149 | 22 | 14 | 7 | 75% | 4.0 | 14.8% | 9.4% | 5.4% | 4.7% | 6.75 | 5.88 | -0.2 |
| 2025 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 117 | 537 | 61 | 49 | 14 | 77% | 4.5 | 9.9% | 8.1% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 5.55 | 5.06 | +0.5 |
| 2025 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 117 | 537 | 61 | 49 | 14 | 77% | 4.5 | 9.9% | 8.1% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 5.55 | 5.06 | +0.5 |
| 2025 | 35 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 20 | 117 | 537 | 61 | 49 | 14 | 77% | 4.5 | 11.4% | 9.1% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 5.55 | 4.87 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 30 | 12 | 93 | 425 | 60 | 22 | 11 | 40% | 3.1 | 14.1% | 5.2% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 5.34 | 4.06 | +0.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 37 | MLB | ARI | 1 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 6.0 | 14.9% | 8.6% | 6.3% | 3.1% | 5.07 | 5.02 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 38 | MLB MLE | ARI | 6 | 6 | 33 | 140 | 20 | 13 | 5 | 100% | 5.5 | 14.6% | 9.4% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 5.23 | 5.38 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 39 | MLB MLE | ARI | 4 | 4 | 24 | 100 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 100% | 5.9 | 14.1% | 10.1% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 5.50 | 5.73 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 38 | MLB CTX | ARI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.6% | 9.4% | 5.3% | 3.4% | 5.12 | 5.27 | — |
| 2029 | 39 | MLB CTX | ARI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.1% | 10.1% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 5.38 | 5.61 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 30 | 12 | 93 | 425 | 60 | 22 | 11 | 40% | 3.1 | 14.1% | 5.2% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 5.34 | 3.98 | +0.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 65 | 26 | 200 | 917 | 129 | 47 | 24 | 40% | 3.1 | 14.1% | 5.2% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 5.34 | 3.98 | +1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 149 | 109 | 643 | 2863 | 399 | 224 | 90 | 73% | 4.3 | 13.9% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 3.2% | 4.97 | 4.65 | +1.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 46 | 34 | 200 | 891 | 124 | 70 | 28 | 73% | 4.3 | 13.9% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 3.2% | 4.97 | 4.65 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAReno Aces · 115 IPFIP 4.72 → 5.06 (+0.33)K% 11.5% → 9.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.49% | — | ×0.860 | 9.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.04% | — | ×0.900 | 8.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.64% | ÷0.904 | ×1.100 | 3.21% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 4.72 → 5.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAALouisville Bats · 27 IPFIP 5.77 → 5.78 (+0.01)K% 14.1% → 12.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.06% | — | ×0.860 | 12.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.16% | — | ×0.900 | 9.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.69% | ÷1.111 | ×1.100 | 4.64% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 122).
Result: FIP 5.77 → 5.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAASacramento River Cats · 136 IPFIP 4.07 → 4.48 (+0.41)K% 18.8% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.81% | — | ×0.880 | 16.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.27% | — | ×1.050 | 6.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.22% | ÷0.998 | ×1.100 | 3.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.07 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAASacramento River Cats · 101 IPFIP 4.54 → 5.25 (+0.71)K% 18.4% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.43% | — | ×0.880 | 16.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.09% | — | ×1.050 | 8.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.60% | ÷0.889 | ×1.100 | 4.45% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 4.54 → 5.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAGwinnett Braves · 74 IPFIP 4.05 → 4.24 (+0.19)K% 15.6% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.56% | — | ×0.880 | 13.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.27% | — | ×1.050 | 9.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.99% | ÷1.132 | ×1.100 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 4.05 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AASan Antonio Missions · 82 IPFIP 3.93 → 4.67 (+0.74)K% 16.1% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.13% | — | ×0.810 | 13.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.14% | — | ×1.100 | 10.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.88% | ÷0.885 | ×1.200 | 2.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 77).
Result: FIP 3.93 → 4.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 16 IPFIP 1.95 → 2.18 (+0.23)K% 20.0% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.880 | 17.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.29% | — | ×1.050 | 4.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 1.95 → 2.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.0 | 34 | 14.4% | 7.8% | 1.17 | 5.27 |
| Jeff Manship ('16) | 1.1 | 32 | 16.5% | 9.3% | 1.05 | 4.82 |
| Mike Lincoln ('10) | 1.9 | 54 | 14.1% | 8.9% | 1.32 | 5.33 |
| Steve Kealey ('68-'73, -1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 54 | 18.5%* | 7.2%* | 1.32* | 5.26* |
| Brian Stokes ('10) | 1.0 | 52 | 14.5% | 10.1% | 1.22 | 5.27 |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |
| Dennis Powell ('85-'93, -2 WAR*) | 1.7 | 49 | 17.6%* | 10.1%* | 1.18* | 5.31* |