Jacob DeLabio

P Corpus Christi Hooks

Age 29 RHP 6'5" / 235 lbs AA

Overview

AAPROSPECT

MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	24	MIX3 levels	23	1	30	1.78	2.70	27.6%	11.8%	—	K 20.3% · BB 13.7% · FIP 3.91
2023	25	MIX2 levels	26	0	31	1.15	2.91	26.5%	16.2%	—	K 20.6% · BB 19.0% · FIP 3.77
2024	26	AAHOU	17	0	22	4.57	3.84	27.4%	14.7%	—	K 22.2% · BB 16.2% · FIP 4.71
2027PROJ	29	MLBHOU	12	0	13	4.56	4.56	23.1%	10.9%	-0.0
2028PROJ31% MLB	30	MLBHOU	6	0	6	4.64	4.71	22.8%	11.1%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsJoe Nelson (age 31) · Jason Bulger (age 29) · Neil Wagner (age 29)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 120112vR 104

ERA4.56

FIP4.56

K%23.1%

BB%10.9%

K-BB%12.2%

Proj IP13

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 13 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	23	MIX MLE	2 levels	9	0	10	44	19	9	0	0%	1.1	43.2%	20.5%	22.7%	0.0%	0.90	2.04	—
2021	23	MIX RAW	2 levels	9	0	10	44	19	9	0	0%	1.1	43.2%	20.5%	22.7%	0.0%	0.90	2.00	—
2022	24	MIX MLE	3 levels	23	1	30	127	35	15	1	4%	1.3	20.3%	13.7%	6.6%	1.4%	1.78	3.91	—
2022	24	MIX RAW	3 levels	23	1	30	127	35	15	1	4%	1.3	27.6%	11.8%	15.7%	0.8%	1.78	2.70	—
2023	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	26	0	31	136	36	22	0	0%	1.2	20.6%	19.0%	1.6%	0.0%	1.15	3.77	—
2023	25	MIX RAW	2 levels	26	0	31	136	36	22	0	0%	1.2	26.5%	16.2%	10.3%	0.0%	1.15	2.91	—
2024	26	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	17	0	22	95	26	14	2	0%	1.3	22.2%	16.2%	6.0%	2.6%	4.57	4.71	—
2024	26	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	17	0	22	95	26	14	2	0%	1.3	22.2%	16.2%	6.0%	2.6%	4.57	4.71	—
2024	26	AA RAW	Corpus Christi Hooks	17	0	22	95	26	14	2	0%	1.3	27.4%	14.7%	12.6%	2.1%	4.57	3.84	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	29	MLB	HOU	12	0	13	55	13	6	2	0%	1.1	23.1%	10.9%	12.2%	3.0%	4.56	4.56	-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	30	MLB MLE	HOU	19	0	20	84	19	9	3	0%	1.1	22.8%	11.1%	11.7%	3.2%	4.64	4.71	-0.0
2028	30	MLB CTX	HOU	6	0	6	25	6	3	1	0%	1.0	22.8%	11.1%	11.7%	3.2%	4.64	4.71	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	26	6	3	1	0%	1.0	22.8%	11.1%	11.7%	3.2%	4.64	4.33	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	192	96	32	0%	1.1	22.8%	11.1%	11.7%	3.2%	4.64	4.33	+0.5
Career	—	MLE		75	1	93	402	94	68	4	1%	1.2	23.3%	16.8%	6.5%	1.1%	2.12	3.85	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		161	2	200	861	201	145	9	1%	1.2	23.3%	16.8%	6.5%	1.1%	2.12	3.85	-0.4

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Jacob DeLabio (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.56	23.1%	10.9%	3.0%	—	4.71	22.8%	11.7%	20	+0.15	—	—	—
Joe Nelson R 2006 · 3.91 FIP	31	SU	3.91	22.8%	10.4%	2.6%	.258	4.05	23.4%	12.8%	94	+0.14	3.08	139	87
Jason Bulger R 2008 · 4.60 FIP	29	SU	4.60	27.4%	12.3%	4.1%	.293	3.94	25.1%	13.3%	90	-0.66	3.78	106	85
Neil Wagner R 2013 · 4.02 FIP	29	SU	4.02	20.5%	7.5%	3.1%	.306	4.05	19.8%	7.5%	43	+0.03	3.11	135	84
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	83
Tyler Sturdevant R 2015 · 4.37 FIP	29	SU	4.37	21.3%	8.5%	3.6%	.241	3.97	18.5%	11.9%	118	-0.40	3.44	149	83
Wirfin Obispo R 2015 · 4.80 FIP	30	SU	4.80	18.6%	12.2%	3.1%	.292	1.31	28.6%	24.5%	126	-3.49	1.30	218	83
Cody Hall R 2017 · 4.03 FIP	29	SU	4.03	26.8%	10.0%	3.5%	.299	3.92	25.9%	8.4%	19	-0.11	3.51	134	82
Gerardo Sanchez R 2017 · 3.47 FIP	28	SU	3.47	21.6%	8.4%	2.1%	.355	3.58	20.5%	15.1%	56	+0.11	2.65	137	81
Dustin Molleken R 2015 · 3.74 FIP	30	SU	3.74	20.4%	11.7%	1.6%	.287	3.90	20.6%	8.4%	77	+0.16	3.38	129	80
Marcos Mateo R 2011 · 3.40 FIP	27	SU	3.40	25.5%	10.2%	2.1%	.361	—	—	—	—	—	3.12	104	80
Coleman Huntley III R 2022 · 4.05 FIP	29	SU	4.05	24.4%	10.9%	3.0%	.311	2.38	20.9%	12.6%	25	-1.67	2.38	160	80
Diego Moreno R 2016 · 3.75 FIP	29	SU	3.75	21.0%	8.2%	2.5%	.347	3.13	17.8%	11.9%	54	-0.62	2.29	187	79
Brian Sanches R 2008 · 4.74 FIP	29	SU	4.74	18.5%	9.3%	3.7%	.378	4.01	20.5%	10.8%	182	-0.73	3.39	229	79
Joe Colón J R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	27	SU	4.25	20.4%	12.1%	2.4%	.315	—	—	—	—	—	3.27	113	78
Michael Dimock R 2018 · 3.37 FIP	28	SU	3.37	23.5%	10.7%	1.6%	.346	—	—	—	—	—	3.08	166	78
Andrew Robinson R 2017 · 4.32 FIP	29	SU	4.32	23.4%	8.8%	3.8%	.245	—	—	—	—	—	3.19	160	78
Scott Atchison R 2004 · 3.61 FIP	28	SU	3.61	27.1%	9.0%	3.0%	.309	4.55	19.1%	11.5%	31	+0.94	2.52	340	78
Brandon Cunniff R 2017 · 4.79 FIP	28	SU	4.79	20.1%	11.6%	3.5%	.275	6.80	13.9%	-1.9%	30	+2.01	3.89	180	77
Manny Acosta R 2010 · 3.61 FIP	29	SU	3.61	26.8%	10.8%	2.5%	.277	4.12	21.9%	12.6%	94	+0.51	3.08	350	77
Cole McDonald R 2024 · 5.01 FIP	27	SU	5.01	20.9%	12.7%	3.8%	.281	—	—	—	—	—	2.81	153	77