Carlos Pelegrin
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 21 | A/ROK2 orgs | 198 | .172/.315/.294 | 4 | 2 | 14 | — | .111/.203/.186 |
| 2022 | 22 | ROKDET | 126 | .236/.333/.345 | 2 | 3 | 19 | — | .155/.222/.224 |
| 2023 | 23 | A/ROKDET | 204 | .251/.325/.415 | 6 | 6 | 37 | — | .174/.232/.263 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 54 | 49 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 111 | 41 | 152 | 20 | 53 | 56 | 9 | 88 | -77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK | FCL Tigers West | — | 144 | 114 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 42 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 237 | 392 | 404 | 795 | 167 | 338 | 29 | 18 | 362 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 126 | 110 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 35 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 236 | 333 | 345 | 679 | 109 | 329 | 28 | 12 | 312 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 184 | 163 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 58 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 239 | 322 | 374 | 697 | 135 | 347 | 32 | 9 | 314 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 350 | 350 | 750 | 1.100 | 400 | 455 | 35 | 0 | 472 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 54 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 56 | 45 | 76 | 6 | 54 | -77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers West | — | 144 | 125 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 60 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 152 | 259 | 256 | 515 | 104 | 259 | 42 | 10 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 126 | 116 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 155 | 222 | 224 | 446 | 69 | 250 | 41 | 7 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 184 | 169 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 81 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 172 | 235 | 249 | 483 | 77 | 314 | 44 | 6 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 20 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 200 | 332 | 50 | 0 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 198 | 176 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 101 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 114 | 208 | 193 | 401 | 80 | 236 | 51 | 9 | 189 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 198 | 163 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 31 | 72 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 172 | 315 | 294 | 609 | 123 | 276 | 36 | 16 | 287 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 126 | 116 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 155 | 222 | 224 | 446 | 69 | 270 | 41 | 7 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 126 | 110 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 35 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 236 | 333 | 345 | 679 | 109 | 329 | 28 | 12 | 312 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 204 | 189 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 91 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 175 | 232 | 265 | 496 | 90 | 316 | 45 | 5 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 204 | 183 | 46 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 251 | 325 | 415 | 740 | 164 | 357 | 32 | 8 | 330 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 198 | 175 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 101 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 114 | 208 | 194 | 402 | 80 | 201 | 51 | 9 | 189 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 126 | 115 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 157 | 222 | 226 | 448 | 70 | 250 | 41 | 7 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 204 | 188 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 91 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 176 | 232 | 266 | 497 | 90 | 316 | 45 | 5 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 528 | 481 | 71 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 38 | 244 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 148 | 221 | 229 | 449 | 81 | 278 | 46 | 7 | 204 | 24 | -48 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +11 | -3.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 592 | 87 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 47 | 300 | 9 | 14 | 5 | 147 | 221 | 228 | 449 | 81 | 276 | 46 | 7 | 204 | 24 | -59 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -4.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 184 PAwOBA .306 → .219 (−87)K% 31.5% → 44.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.52% | ÷0.975 | ×1.360 | — | — | 43.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.24% | ÷1.089 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.63% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 1.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.76% | ÷0.957 | ×0.920 | ×1.009 | ×0.990 | 23.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.62% | ÷1.056 | ×0.830 | ×1.009 | ×0.990 | 5.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.95% | ÷1.020 | ×0.910 | ×1.009 | ×0.990 | 0.85% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.81% | ÷1.216 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 2.48% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 143, 1B 91, 2B 111, 3B 104, K 95, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.
Result: wOBA .306 → .219; ISO .135 → .084; BABIP .347 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Tigers · 20 PAwOBA .457 → .262 (−194)K% 35.0% → 51.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.00% | ÷0.972 | ×1.440 | — | — | 51.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷0.987 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷0.987 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 18.50% |
| Doubles /BIP | 15.38% | ÷1.014 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 10.54% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 15.38% | ÷0.924 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 12.53% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 97, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .457 → .262; ISO .400 → .232; BABIP .455 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Tigers · 126 PAwOBA .304 → .196 (−108)K% 27.8% → 41.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.78% | ÷0.973 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.90% | ÷0.978 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 7.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.79% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.33% | ÷1.018 | ×0.820 | ×0.986 | ×0.975 | 19.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.33% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | ×0.986 | ×0.975 | 3.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.33% | ÷0.990 | ×0.720 | ×0.986 | ×0.975 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.67% | ÷0.990 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 2.05% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 104, 2B 88, 3B 98, K 95, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.
Result: wOBA .304 → .196; ISO .109 → .070; BABIP .329 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Tigers West · 144 PAwOBA .354 → .239 (−115)K% 29.2% → 41.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.17% | ÷1.010 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.06% | ÷1.066 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 10.35% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.08% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.22% | ÷0.984 | ×0.820 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 18.06% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.72% | ÷1.027 | ×0.720 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 6.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.949 | ×0.720 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.56% | ÷0.906 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 4.71% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 97, 2B 105, 3B 90, K 102, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .354 → .239; ISO .167 → .122; BABIP .338 → .259. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 54 PAwOBA .087 → .054 (−33)K% 55.6% → 76.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 55.56% | ÷0.988 | ×1.360 | — | — | 76.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.26% | ÷1.017 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.38% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.992 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 4.47% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.016 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.937 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 100, 2B 98, 3B 103, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .087 → .054; ISO .020 → .008; BABIP .053 → .045. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).