C.J. Pittaro
SS Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23 | A+/AOAK | 503 | .232/.335/.299 | 1 | 7 | 44 | — | .194/.269/.247 |
| 2026 | 24 | A+OAK | 354 | .218/.344/.249 | 1 | 1 | 48 | — | .198/.292/.224 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBOAK | 1 | .204/.285/.252 | 0 | 0 | 53 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 64 | .209/.289/.273 | 0 | 1 | 59 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ42% MLB | 27 | MLBOAK | 103 | .210/.290/.278 | 1 | 1 | 61 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 40 / POW 25
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 90 | 85 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 176 | 222 | 200 | 422 | 24 | 242 | 26 | 6 | 197 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 413 | 350 | 86 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 52 | 85 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 246 | 359 | 323 | 682 | 77 | 321 | 21 | 13 | 318 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 293 | 64 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 58 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 218 | 344 | 249 | 593 | 31 | 266 | 16 | 14 | 284 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 90 | 87 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 138 | 167 | 161 | 328 | 23 | 212 | 33 | 3 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 413 | 368 | 76 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 34 | 114 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 207 | 291 | 266 | 558 | 60 | 295 | 28 | 8 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 308 | 61 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 74 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 198 | 292 | 224 | 516 | 26 | 248 | 21 | 10 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 503 | 454 | 89 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 38 | 145 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 196 | 273 | 249 | 522 | 53 | 285 | 29 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 503 | 435 | 101 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 57 | 108 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 232 | 335 | 299 | 634 | 67 | 306 | 21 | 11 | 297 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 308 | 61 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 74 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 198 | 292 | 224 | 516 | 26 | 254 | 21 | 10 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 293 | 64 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 58 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 218 | 344 | 249 | 593 | 31 | 266 | 16 | 14 | 284 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 503 | 450 | 89 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 38 | 145 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 198 | 273 | 251 | 524 | 53 | 280 | 29 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 310 | 61 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 74 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 197 | 292 | 223 | 515 | 26 | 248 | 21 | 10 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 503 | 450 | 89 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 38 | 145 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 198 | 273 | 251 | 524 | 53 | 280 | 29 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 354 | 310 | 61 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 74 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 197 | 292 | 223 | 515 | 26 | 248 | 21 | 10 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 380 | 339 | 68 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 92 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 199 | 280 | 243 | 524 | 44 | 267 | 24 | 9 | 246 | 53 | -21 | -0 | +0 | +4 | +8 | -0.3 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 204 | 285 | 252 | 537 | 48 | 274 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 53 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 211 | 188 | 38 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 51 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 285 | 264 | 549 | 60 | 269 | 24 | 9 | 256 | 59 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +5 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 42% | 247 | 220 | 46 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 59 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 205 | 286 | 269 | 555 | 64 | 269 | 24 | 9 | 258 | 61 | -12 | -0 | +0 | +3 | +5 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 64 | 57 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 209 | 289 | 273 | 562 | 64 | 276 | 23 | 9 | 261 | 59 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 42% | 103 | 92 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 210 | 290 | 278 | 568 | 67 | 277 | 24 | 9 | 263 | 61 | -5 | -0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 167 | 149 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 40 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 201 | 283 | 255 | 538 | 54 | 266 | 24 | 9 | 262 | 51 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +4 | -0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 580 | 116 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 58 | 156 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 200 | 282 | 253 | 535 | 53 | 264 | 24 | 9 | 262 | 51 | -31 | +0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1501 | 1335 | 267 | 35 | 7 | 5 | 129 | 374 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 200 | 283 | 248 | 531 | 48 | 272 | 25 | 9 | 244 | 51 | -32 | -0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 115 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 56 | 162 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 199 | 282 | 246 | 528 | 47 | 271 | 25 | 9 | 244 | 51 | -33 | -0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 354 PAwOBA .281 → .239 (−42)K% 16.4% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.38% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 20.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 9.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.69% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 1.31% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 22.92% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 2.12% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 0.33% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .281 → .239; ISO .031 → .026; BABIP .266 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 413 PAwOBA .312 → .253 (−59)K% 20.6% → 27.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.58% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 27.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.59% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 8.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.42% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.53% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 23.14% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.04% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 5.21% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.51% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 1.23% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.38% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 0.27% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .312 → .253; ISO .077 → .062; BABIP .321 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 90 PAwOBA .193 → .148 (−44)K% 25.6% → 33.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.56% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 33.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.56% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 3.72% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.58% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 19.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.61% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 1.24% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .193 → .148; ISO .024 → .016; BABIP .242 → .212. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).