Odalys Peguero
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19 | ROKTB | 161 | .260/.390/.351 | 1 | 10 | 50 | — | .184/.277/.248 |
| 2023 | 20 | A/ROK/INTL2 orgs | 442 | .239/.354/.328 | 3 | 21 | 73 | — | .186/.274/.295 |
| 2024 | 21 | ATB | 294 | .167/.294/.196 | 0 | 25 | 11 | — | .139/.228/.162 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK | DSL Rays 1 | — | 215 | 172 | 47 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 36 | 39 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 273 | 410 | 349 | 759 | 76 | 341 | 18 | 17 | 351 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 161 | 131 | 34 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 39 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 260 | 390 | 351 | 741 | 92 | 355 | 24 | 17 | 340 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 261 | 215 | 49 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 40 | 52 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 228 | 354 | 353 | 708 | 126 | 285 | 20 | 15 | 321 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 21 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105 | 190 | 158 | 348 | 53 | 154 | 29 | 10 | 171 | -41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | INTL | Perth Heat | — | 160 | 138 | 38 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 24 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 275 | 375 | 312 | 687 | 36 | 327 | 15 | 13 | 323 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 245 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 67 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 167 | 294 | 196 | 490 | 29 | 229 | 23 | 14 | 240 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 215 | 185 | 33 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 49 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 178 | 283 | 227 | 510 | 49 | 223 | 23 | 11 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 161 | 141 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 56 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 184 | 277 | 248 | 525 | 64 | 283 | 35 | 11 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 261 | 228 | 44 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 27 | 72 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 193 | 284 | 307 | 591 | 114 | 257 | 28 | 10 | 260 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 21 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 143 | 150 | 293 | 50 | 117 | 43 | 5 | 107 | -41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 259 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 93 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 139 | 228 | 162 | 391 | 23 | 205 | 32 | 9 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 215 | 185 | 33 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 49 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 178 | 283 | 227 | 510 | 49 | 232 | 23 | 11 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 1 | — | 215 | 172 | 47 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 36 | 39 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 273 | 410 | 349 | 759 | 76 | 341 | 18 | 17 | 351 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 161 | 141 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 56 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 184 | 277 | 248 | 525 | 64 | 291 | 35 | 11 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 161 | 131 | 34 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 39 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 260 | 390 | 351 | 741 | 92 | 355 | 24 | 17 | 340 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 442 | 390 | 70 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 45 | 126 | 3 | 21 | 9 | 179 | 269 | 277 | 546 | 97 | 256 | 29 | 10 | 249 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 442 | 372 | 89 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 63 | 82 | 3 | 21 | 9 | 239 | 354 | 328 | 682 | 89 | 296 | 19 | 14 | 315 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 259 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 93 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 139 | 228 | 162 | 391 | 23 | 216 | 32 | 9 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 245 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 67 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 167 | 294 | 196 | 490 | 29 | 229 | 23 | 14 | 240 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 215 | 186 | 33 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 49 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 177 | 283 | 226 | 509 | 48 | 223 | 23 | 11 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 161 | 142 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 56 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 183 | 277 | 246 | 523 | 63 | 283 | 35 | 11 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 442 | 391 | 70 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 45 | 126 | 3 | 21 | 9 | 179 | 269 | 276 | 546 | 97 | 247 | 29 | 10 | 249 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 262 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 93 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 137 | 228 | 160 | 389 | 23 | 205 | 32 | 9 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 294 | 262 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 93 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 137 | 228 | 160 | 389 | 23 | 205 | 32 | 9 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1112 | 975 | 165 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 113 | 324 | 10 | 77 | 17 | 169 | 262 | 233 | 495 | 64 | 245 | 29 | 10 | 228 | 40 | -79 | +9 | +0 | +12 | +24 | -3.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 570 | 96 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 66 | 189 | 6 | 45 | 10 | 168 | 262 | 230 | 492 | 61 | 244 | 29 | 10 | 228 | 40 | -46 | +5 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ACharleston RiverDogs · 294 PAwOBA .236 → .184 (−52)K% 22.8% → 31.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.79% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.95% | ÷1.047 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 9.33% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.02% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.81% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.10% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.036 | ×1.015 | 17.25% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.93% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×1.036 | ×1.015 | 3.37% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.910 | ×1.036 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.824 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 65, 1B 114, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .236 → .184; ISO .029 → .024; BABIP .229 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACharleston RiverDogs · 261 PAwOBA .319 → .260 (−59)K% 19.9% → 27.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.92% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 27.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.33% | ÷1.035 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 10.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.77% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.02% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 16.95% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.75% | ÷0.964 | ×0.830 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 6.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.07% | ÷0.938 | ×0.910 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 3.09% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.23% | ÷1.075 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.94% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 114, 2B 93, 3B 88, K 97, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.
Result: wOBA .319 → .260; ISO .126 → .112; BABIP .285 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Rays · 21 PAwOBA .167 → .107 (−60)K% 28.6% → 41.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.57% | ÷0.999 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.52% | ÷0.948 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 6.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷0.996 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.995 | 6.30% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.020 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 5.40% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.911 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 100, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .167 → .107; ISO .053 → .031; BABIP .154 → .117. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Rays · 161 PAwOBA .337 → .242 (−95)K% 24.2% → 34.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.22% | ÷1.005 | ×1.440 | — | — | 34.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.39% | ÷0.956 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 11.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.35% | ÷1.023 | ×0.820 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 23.81% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.26% | ÷0.933 | ×0.720 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 2.55% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.26% | ÷1.005 | ×0.720 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 2.36% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.09% | ÷0.902 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.95% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 105, 2B 87, 3B 101, K 101, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.
Result: wOBA .337 → .242; ISO .092 → .067; BABIP .355 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 DSLDSL Rays 1 · 215 PAwOBA .346 → .234 (−112)K% 18.1% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.14% | ÷0.979 | ×1.220 | — | — | 22.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.28% | ÷1.067 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 10.76% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.86% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 1.31% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.32% | ÷1.008 | ×0.680 | ×0.983 | ×1.008 | 19.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.01% | ÷1.114 | ×0.600 | ×0.983 | ×1.008 | 1.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.26% | ÷0.907 | ×0.600 | ×0.983 | ×1.008 | 1.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.75% | ÷0.907 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.39% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 102, 2B 123, 3B 82, K 96, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.
Result: wOBA .346 → .234; ISO .076 → .047; BABIP .341 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .