Jake Vogel
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | ALAA | 499 | .236/.331/.336 | 1 | 19 | 42 | — | .187/.258/.260 |
| 2023 | 21 | A+LAD | 421 | .236/.316/.325 | 3 | 28 | 43 | — | .189/.256/.253 |
| 2024 | 22 | A+LAD | 321 | .177/.299/.244 | 3 | 18 | 19 | — | .141/.233/.190 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 19 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 372 | 325 | 75 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 33 | 111 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 231 | 324 | 338 | 663 | 108 | 338 | 30 | 9 | 303 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 499 | 432 | 102 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 52 | 111 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 236 | 331 | 336 | 666 | 100 | 310 | 22 | 10 | 303 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ | Great Lakes Loons | — | 421 | 369 | 87 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 109 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 236 | 316 | 325 | 642 | 89 | 318 | 26 | 8 | 291 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 271 | 48 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 38 | 94 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 177 | 299 | 244 | 542 | 66 | 257 | 29 | 12 | 260 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 372 | 334 | 61 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 149 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 183 | 262 | 257 | 520 | 75 | 309 | 40 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 499 | 450 | 84 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 34 | 162 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 260 | 518 | 73 | 274 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 421 | 380 | 72 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 138 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 189 | 256 | 253 | 509 | 63 | 276 | 33 | 6 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 284 | 40 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 121 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 141 | 233 | 190 | 423 | 49 | 225 | 38 | 8 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 372 | 334 | 61 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 149 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 183 | 262 | 257 | 520 | 75 | 319 | 40 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 372 | 325 | 75 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 33 | 111 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 231 | 324 | 338 | 663 | 108 | 338 | 30 | 9 | 303 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 499 | 450 | 84 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 34 | 162 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 260 | 518 | 73 | 283 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 499 | 432 | 102 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 52 | 111 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 236 | 331 | 336 | 666 | 100 | 310 | 22 | 10 | 303 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 421 | 380 | 72 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 138 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 189 | 256 | 253 | 509 | 63 | 283 | 33 | 6 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 421 | 369 | 87 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 109 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 236 | 316 | 325 | 642 | 89 | 318 | 26 | 8 | 291 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 284 | 40 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 121 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 141 | 233 | 190 | 423 | 49 | 235 | 38 | 8 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 271 | 48 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 38 | 94 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 177 | 299 | 244 | 542 | 66 | 257 | 29 | 12 | 260 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 372 | 333 | 61 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 149 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 183 | 262 | 258 | 520 | 75 | 309 | 40 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 499 | 453 | 84 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 34 | 162 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 185 | 258 | 258 | 516 | 73 | 274 | 32 | 7 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 421 | 384 | 72 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 138 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 188 | 256 | 250 | 506 | 62 | 276 | 33 | 6 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 284 | 40 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 121 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 141 | 233 | 190 | 423 | 49 | 225 | 38 | 8 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 321 | 284 | 40 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 121 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 141 | 233 | 190 | 423 | 49 | 225 | 38 | 8 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1613 | 1448 | 257 | 47 | 14 | 7 | 108 | 570 | 39 | 77 | 18 | 177 | 253 | 244 | 497 | 66 | 282 | 35 | 7 | 224 | 38 | -119 | +8 | +0 | -10 | +35 | -8.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 104 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 44 | 230 | 16 | 31 | 7 | 178 | 255 | 247 | 502 | 68 | 283 | 35 | 7 | 224 | 38 | -48 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -3.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Great Lakes Loons · 321 PAwOBA .253 → .196 (−57)K% 29.3% → 37.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.28% | ÷0.990 | ×1.270 | — | — | 37.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.53% | ÷1.037 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.88% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.80% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 2.21% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.47% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×0.969 | ×0.998 | 19.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.82% | ÷0.950 | ×0.810 | ×0.969 | ×0.998 | 2.33% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.13% | ÷0.948 | ×0.850 | ×0.969 | ×0.998 | 0.98% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.69% | ÷1.036 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 1.31% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 101, 2B 90, 3B 90, K 98, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.969.
Result: wOBA .253 → .196; ISO .066 → .051; BABIP .257 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Great Lakes Loons · 421 PAwOBA .288 → .232 (−56)K% 25.9% → 32.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.89% | ÷1.004 | ×1.270 | — | — | 32.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.31% | ÷0.992 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 6.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.14% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 1.71% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.46% | ÷0.975 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 21.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.46% | ÷1.011 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 6.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.38% | ÷0.997 | ×0.850 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 0.32% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.15% | ÷0.951 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.98% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 95, 2B 102, 3B 99, K 101, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .288 → .232; ISO .089 → .069; BABIP .318 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 499 PAwOBA .299 → .230 (−69)K% 22.2% → 32.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.24% | ÷0.930 | ×1.360 | — | — | 32.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.42% | ÷1.072 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.80% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.43% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.81% | ÷0.981 | ×0.920 | ×0.954 | ×1.015 | 19.82% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.85% | ÷0.923 | ×0.830 | ×0.954 | ×1.015 | 5.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.80% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.954 | ×1.015 | 2.15% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.31% | ÷1.247 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.20% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 96, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 86, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.954.
Result: wOBA .299 → .230; ISO .100 → .074; BABIP .310 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 372 PAwOBA .297 → .233 (−64)K% 29.8% → 40.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.84% | ÷1.015 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.87% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 6.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.23% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 2.59% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.30% | ÷0.965 | ×0.920 | ×0.985 | ×1.030 | 23.49% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.54% | ÷1.166 | ×0.830 | ×0.985 | ×1.030 | 4.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.80% | ÷0.960 | ×0.910 | ×0.985 | ×1.030 | 2.69% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.40% | ÷0.965 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 1.20% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 93, 2B 133, 3B 92, K 103, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .297 → .233; ISO .108 → .080; BABIP .338 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).