Ricardo Rosario
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19 | ROKPHI | 146 | .262/.350/.381 | 1 | 7 | 36 | — | .182/.245/.258 |
| 2023 | 20 | APHI | 327 | .236/.341/.348 | 7 | 29 | 63 | — | .210/.294/.304 |
| 2024 | 21 | APHI | 66 | .213/.273/.279 | 0 | 4 | 15 | — | .161/.212/.210 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK | DSL Phillies White | — | 191 | 162 | 38 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 31 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 235 | 330 | 327 | 657 | 93 | 272 | 16 | 9 | 294 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK | FCL Phillies | — | 146 | 126 | 33 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 29 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 262 | 350 | 381 | 731 | 119 | 327 | 20 | 10 | 325 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A | Clearwater Threshers | — | 327 | 276 | 65 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 38 | 63 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 236 | 341 | 348 | 688 | 112 | 276 | 19 | 12 | 311 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 61 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 213 | 273 | 279 | 551 | 66 | 310 | 29 | 5 | 255 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Phillies White | — | 191 | 168 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 39 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 161 | 238 | 226 | 464 | 65 | 182 | 20 | 6 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | — | 146 | 132 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 42 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 182 | 245 | 258 | 502 | 76 | 242 | 29 | 6 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 327 | 286 | 60 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 28 | 84 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 210 | 294 | 304 | 598 | 94 | 258 | 26 | 9 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 161 | 212 | 210 | 422 | 48 | 277 | 39 | 3 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Phillies White | — | 191 | 168 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 39 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 161 | 238 | 226 | 464 | 65 | 194 | 20 | 6 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Phillies White | — | 191 | 162 | 38 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 31 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 235 | 330 | 327 | 657 | 93 | 272 | 16 | 9 | 294 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | — | 146 | 132 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 42 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 182 | 245 | 258 | 502 | 76 | 253 | 29 | 6 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | — | 146 | 126 | 33 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 29 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 262 | 350 | 381 | 731 | 119 | 327 | 20 | 10 | 325 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 327 | 286 | 60 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 28 | 84 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 210 | 294 | 304 | 598 | 94 | 270 | 26 | 9 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A RAW | Clearwater Threshers | — | 327 | 276 | 65 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 38 | 63 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 236 | 341 | 348 | 688 | 112 | 276 | 19 | 12 | 311 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 161 | 212 | 210 | 422 | 48 | 278 | 39 | 3 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 61 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 213 | 273 | 279 | 551 | 66 | 310 | 29 | 5 | 255 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Phillies White | — | 191 | 172 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 39 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 157 | 238 | 221 | 459 | 64 | 182 | 20 | 6 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | — | 146 | 134 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 42 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 179 | 245 | 254 | 498 | 75 | 242 | 29 | 6 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 327 | 290 | 60 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 28 | 84 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 207 | 294 | 300 | 594 | 93 | 258 | 26 | 9 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 161 | 212 | 210 | 422 | 48 | 277 | 39 | 3 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | — | 66 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 161 | 212 | 210 | 422 | 48 | 277 | 39 | 3 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 730 | 648 | 121 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 51 | 191 | 15 | 52 | 11 | 187 | 262 | 265 | 527 | 79 | 245 | 26 | 7 | 232 | 43 | -49 | +6 | +0 | -4 | +16 | -3.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 577 | 107 | 15 | 4 | 7 | 45 | 170 | 13 | 46 | 10 | 185 | 260 | 262 | 522 | 76 | 243 | 26 | 7 | 232 | 43 | -44 | +5 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AClearwater Threshers · 66 PAwOBA .249 → .190 (−59)K% 28.8% → 39.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.79% | ÷0.982 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.55% | ÷0.973 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 3.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.03% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 2.40% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.43% | ÷1.042 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 19.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.52% | ÷0.938 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 8.55% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.132 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.115 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 108, 2B 88, 3B 126, K 96, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .249 → .190; ISO .066 → .050; BABIP .310 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AClearwater Threshers · 327 PAwOBA .307 → .262 (−46)K% 19.3% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.27% | ÷1.020 | ×1.360 | — | — | 25.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.62% | ÷0.972 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 8.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.83% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 1.47% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.47% | ÷0.965 | ×0.920 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 22.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.82% | ÷1.002 | ×0.830 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 2.34% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.94% | ÷1.056 | ×0.910 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 0.81% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 2.71% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 93, 2B 100, 3B 111, K 104, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.
Result: wOBA .307 → .262; ISO .112 → .092; BABIP .276 → .258. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Phillies · 146 PAwOBA .321 → .222 (−100)K% 19.9% → 28.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.86% | ÷1.004 | ×1.440 | — | — | 28.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.27% | ÷0.989 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 6.49% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.37% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.99% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.68% | ÷0.981 | ×0.820 | ×0.954 | ×1.008 | 18.22% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.25% | ÷1.178 | ×0.720 | ×0.954 | ×1.008 | 4.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.954 | ×1.008 | 1.43% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.03% | ÷0.947 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.86% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 96, 2B 136, 3B 100, K 101, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.954.
Result: wOBA .321 → .222; ISO .119 → .076; BABIP .327 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 DSLDSL Phillies White · 191 PAwOBA .296 → .204 (−93)K% 16.2% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.23% | ÷0.960 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.42% | ÷1.021 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 6.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.62% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 1.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.37% | ÷1.039 | ×0.680 | ×1.024 | ×1.008 | 14.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.58% | ÷0.953 | ×0.600 | ×1.024 | ×1.008 | 2.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.29% | ÷0.938 | ×0.600 | ×1.024 | ×1.008 | 1.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.76% | ÷0.864 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.42% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 108, 2B 91, 3B 88, K 92, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.
Result: wOBA .296 → .204; ISO .093 → .061; BABIP .272 → .182. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).