Carter Williams
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 23 | ASF | 243 | .262/.305/.453 | 7 | 6 | 53 | — | .203/.230/.338 |
| 2022 | 24 | A+/ASF | 342 | .336/.415/.525 | 11 | 8 | 108 | — | .275/.332/.416 |
| 2023 | 25 | AA/A+SF | 265 | .215/.269/.337 | 8 | 6 | 32 | — | .176/.220/.264 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A | San Jose Giants | — | 243 | 225 | 59 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 49 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 262 | 305 | 453 | 759 | 191 | 304 | 20 | 5 | 327 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ | Eugene Emeralds | — | 146 | 137 | 38 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 277 | 312 | 423 | 736 | 146 | 337 | 23 | 5 | 322 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A | San Jose Giants | — | 196 | 158 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 26 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 386 | 492 | 614 | 1.106 | 228 | 415 | 13 | 14 | 471 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 186 | 172 | 39 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 42 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 227 | 281 | 337 | 618 | 110 | 270 | 23 | 6 | 279 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | A+ | Eugene Emeralds | — | 79 | 74 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 189 | 241 | 338 | 578 | 149 | 224 | 28 | 5 | 259 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | San Jose Giants | — | 243 | 231 | 47 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 69 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 203 | 230 | 338 | 568 | 134 | 263 | 28 | 3 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 146 | 139 | 31 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 223 | 250 | 331 | 581 | 108 | 295 | 31 | 3 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A MLE | San Jose Giants | — | 196 | 169 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 37 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 314 | 393 | 479 | 872 | 166 | 352 | 19 | 8 | 384 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 186 | 175 | 34 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 52 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 194 | 238 | 280 | 518 | 86 | 248 | 28 | 4 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 79 | 75 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 133 | 177 | 227 | 404 | 93 | 179 | 37 | 4 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | San Jose Giants | — | 243 | 231 | 47 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 69 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 203 | 230 | 338 | 568 | 134 | 264 | 28 | 3 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A RAW | San Jose Giants | — | 243 | 225 | 59 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 49 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 262 | 305 | 453 | 759 | 191 | 304 | 20 | 5 | 327 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 342 | 308 | 84 | 17 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 82 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 273 | 331 | 412 | 744 | 140 | 338 | 24 | 6 | 327 | 108 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 342 | 295 | 99 | 21 | 1 | 11 | 34 | 60 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 336 | 415 | 525 | 940 | 190 | 381 | 18 | 10 | 407 | 108 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 265 | 250 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 81 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 176 | 220 | 264 | 484 | 88 | 232 | 31 | 4 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 265 | 246 | 53 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 64 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 215 | 269 | 337 | 606 | 122 | 257 | 24 | 6 | 273 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | San Jose Giants | — | 243 | 233 | 47 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 69 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 202 | 230 | 335 | 565 | 133 | 263 | 28 | 3 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 342 | 312 | 84 | 17 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 82 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 269 | 331 | 407 | 738 | 138 | 328 | 24 | 6 | 327 | 108 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 265 | 249 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 81 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 177 | 220 | 265 | 485 | 88 | 227 | 31 | 4 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 850 | 789 | 175 | 31 | 4 | 19 | 39 | 232 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 222 | 267 | 343 | 611 | 122 | 285 | 27 | 5 | 269 | 68 | -32 | +1 | +0 | -5 | +18 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 603 | 135 | 24 | 3 | 15 | 30 | 177 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 224 | 270 | 348 | 619 | 124 | 286 | 27 | 5 | 269 | 68 | -24 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 186 PAwOBA .273 → .231 (−42)K% 22.6% → 27.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.58% | ÷0.995 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.91% | ÷0.985 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 4.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.08% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.998 | 0.91% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷0.978 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 21.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.08% | ÷1.003 | ×0.860 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 2.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.950 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.85% | ÷0.906 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.998 | 3.31% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 96, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .273 → .231; ISO .110 → .090; BABIP .270 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Eugene Emeralds · 79 PAwOBA .252 → .178 (−74)K% 27.8% → 36.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.85% | ÷1.021 | ×1.350 | — | — | 36.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.06% | ÷0.975 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 3.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.27% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.978 | 1.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.31% | ÷1.047 | ×0.910 | ×0.964 | ×0.978 | 14.18% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷1.031 | ×0.830 | ×0.964 | ×0.978 | 2.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | ×0.964 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.77% | ÷1.076 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.978 | 4.35% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 109, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 104, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.964.
Result: wOBA .252 → .178; ISO .149 → .100; BABIP .224 → .179. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ASan Jose Giants · 196 PAwOBA .469 → .384 (−85)K% 13.3% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.27% | ÷0.943 | ×1.360 | — | — | 19.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.76% | ÷1.055 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 8.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.06% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 2.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.30% | ÷0.983 | ×0.920 | ×0.952 | ×0.980 | 26.45% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.85% | ÷0.957 | ×0.830 | ×0.952 | ×0.980 | 7.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.76% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.952 | ×0.980 | 0.71% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.30% | ÷1.063 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 3.91% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 97, 2B 91, 3B 80, K 89, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.
Result: wOBA .469 → .384; ISO .228 → .184; BABIP .415 → .352. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Eugene Emeralds · 146 PAwOBA .317 → .251 (−66)K% 23.3% → 30.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.29% | ÷1.029 | ×1.350 | — | — | 30.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.79% | ÷0.978 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 3.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.24% | ÷0.989 | ×0.910 | ×0.989 | ×0.988 | 22.69% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.77% | ÷0.953 | ×0.830 | ×0.989 | ×0.988 | 6.61% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.930 | ×0.820 | ×0.989 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.88% | ÷1.120 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 2.84% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 98, 2B 91, 3B 86, K 106, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.
Result: wOBA .317 → .251; ISO .146 → .107; BABIP .337 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ASan Jose Giants · 243 PAwOBA .321 → .247 (−74)K% 20.2% → 28.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.16% | ÷0.959 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.35% | ÷1.203 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 3.04% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.41% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.32% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.32% | ÷0.977 | ×0.920 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 17.65% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.95% | ÷1.014 | ×0.830 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 6.32% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.27% | ÷1.098 | ×0.910 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 1.83% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.98% | ÷1.008 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 3.13% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 95, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 92, BB 141 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.980.
Result: wOBA .321 → .247; ISO .191 → .142; BABIP .304 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).