Cristopher Barete
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 19 | ROKDSL Rays 1 | 130 | .309/.415/.509 | 2 | 9 | 57 | — | .188/.269/.299 |
| 2023 | 21 | ATB | 370 | .252/.320/.318 | 2 | 25 | 37 | — | .200/.251/.250 |
| 2024 | 22 | ATB | 104 | .185/.257/.239 | 0 | 9 | 5 | — | .146/.188/.188 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK | DSL Rays 1 | — | 216 | 190 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 32 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 200 | 286 | 253 | 539 | 53 | 236 | 15 | 9 | 252 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK | DSL Rays 1 | — | 130 | 110 | 34 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 27 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 309 | 415 | 509 | 924 | 200 | 395 | 21 | 15 | 408 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 370 | 330 | 83 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 95 | 2 | 25 | 8 | 252 | 320 | 318 | 638 | 67 | 345 | 26 | 8 | 288 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 92 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 185 | 257 | 239 | 497 | 54 | 239 | 21 | 9 | 226 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 216 | 196 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 39 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 122 | 192 | 143 | 335 | 20 | 149 | 18 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 130 | 117 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 34 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 188 | 269 | 299 | 568 | 111 | 252 | 26 | 9 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 370 | 340 | 68 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 131 | 2 | 25 | 8 | 200 | 251 | 250 | 501 | 50 | 309 | 35 | 6 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 96 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 146 | 188 | 188 | 376 | 42 | 211 | 29 | 5 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 216 | 196 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 39 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 122 | 192 | 143 | 335 | 20 | 153 | 18 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 1 | — | 216 | 190 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 32 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 200 | 286 | 253 | 539 | 53 | 236 | 15 | 9 | 252 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 130 | 117 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 34 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 188 | 269 | 299 | 568 | 111 | 256 | 26 | 9 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 1 | — | 130 | 110 | 34 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 27 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 309 | 415 | 509 | 924 | 200 | 395 | 21 | 15 | 408 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 370 | 340 | 68 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 131 | 2 | 25 | 8 | 200 | 251 | 250 | 501 | 50 | 319 | 35 | 6 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 370 | 330 | 83 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 95 | 2 | 25 | 8 | 252 | 320 | 318 | 638 | 67 | 345 | 26 | 8 | 288 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 96 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 146 | 188 | 188 | 376 | 42 | 209 | 29 | 5 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 92 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 185 | 257 | 239 | 497 | 54 | 239 | 21 | 9 | 226 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 216 | 197 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 39 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 122 | 192 | 142 | 335 | 20 | 149 | 18 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 1 | — | 130 | 116 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 34 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 190 | 269 | 302 | 571 | 112 | 252 | 26 | 9 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 370 | 344 | 68 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 131 | 2 | 25 | 8 | 198 | 251 | 247 | 498 | 49 | 309 | 35 | 6 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 98 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 143 | 188 | 184 | 372 | 41 | 211 | 29 | 5 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 104 | 98 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 143 | 188 | 184 | 372 | 41 | 211 | 29 | 5 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 820 | 749 | 128 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 52 | 234 | 6 | 57 | 19 | 171 | 230 | 222 | 452 | 51 | 244 | 29 | 6 | 205 | 25 | -73 | +4 | +0 | +3 | +18 | -5.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 101 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 41 | 185 | 5 | 45 | 15 | 170 | 230 | 222 | 452 | 52 | 242 | 28 | 6 | 205 | 25 | -58 | +3 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ACharleston RiverDogs · 104 PAwOBA .218 → .176 (−42)K% 21.2% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.15% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.69% | ÷1.047 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.57% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.048 | ×0.990 | 16.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.29% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×1.048 | ×0.990 | 3.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.099 | ×0.910 | ×1.048 | ×0.990 | 1.23% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.824 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 65, 1B 114, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.048.
Result: wOBA .218 → .176; ISO .054 → .045; BABIP .239 → .211. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACharleston RiverDogs · 370 PAwOBA .282 → .223 (−59)K% 25.7% → 35.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.68% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.38% | ÷1.035 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.54% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.42% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.51% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.044 | — | 25.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.11% | ÷0.964 | ×0.830 | ×1.044 | — | 4.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.85% | ÷0.938 | ×0.910 | ×1.044 | — | 0.86% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.85% | ÷1.075 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.63% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 114, 2B 93, 3B 88, K 97, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.
Result: wOBA .282 → .223; ISO .067 → .054; BABIP .345 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 DSLDSL Rays 1 · 130 PAwOBA .398 → .252 (−146)K% 20.8% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.77% | ÷0.979 | ×1.220 | — | — | 25.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.62% | ÷1.067 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 9.45% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.77% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 0.53% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.89% | ÷1.008 | ×0.680 | ×1.040 | ×0.985 | 15.82% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.05% | ÷1.114 | ×0.600 | ×1.040 | ×0.985 | 6.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.61% | ÷0.907 | ×0.600 | ×1.040 | ×0.985 | 2.45% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.41% | ÷0.907 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.985 | 1.23% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 102, 2B 123, 3B 82, K 96, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 18.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.
Result: wOBA .398 → .252; ISO .200 → .115; BABIP .395 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 DSLDSL Rays 1 · 216 PAwOBA .246 → .161 (−85)K% 14.8% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.81% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 6.53% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.39% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.98% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 12.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 2.54% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.30% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .246 → .161; ISO .053 → .029; BABIP .236 → .149. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).