Adinso Reyes
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 19 | ROKFCL Tigers Ea… | 184 | .184/.273/.356 | 7 | 1 | -4 | — | .101/.175/.196 |
| 2022 | 20 | A/ROKDET | 215 | .276/.347/.453 | 9 | 1 | 46 | — | .187/.245/.288 |
| 2023 | 21 | A/ROKDET | 153 | .241/.301/.397 | 4 | 2 | 23 | — | .172/.216/.283 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK | DSL Tigers 1 | — | 269 | 242 | 80 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 51 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 331 | 386 | 508 | 895 | 178 | 386 | 19 | 5 | 389 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK | FCL Tigers East | — | 184 | 163 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 73 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 184 | 273 | 356 | 629 | 172 | 274 | 40 | 7 | 284 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 83 | 75 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 187 | 265 | 360 | 625 | 173 | 278 | 42 | 10 | 281 | -3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 132 | 117 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 333 | 400 | 513 | 913 | 179 | 415 | 24 | 9 | 398 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 110 | 101 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 41 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 208 | 273 | 366 | 639 | 158 | 316 | 37 | 8 | 286 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 43 | 40 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 325 | 372 | 475 | 847 | 150 | 429 | 26 | 7 | 376 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 1 | — | 269 | 247 | 50 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 62 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 202 | 254 | 296 | 549 | 93 | 238 | 23 | 3 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers East | — | 184 | 168 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 106 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 101 | 175 | 196 | 371 | 95 | 202 | 58 | 4 | 163 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 83 | 77 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 117 | 181 | 208 | 389 | 91 | 246 | 58 | 7 | 164 | -3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 132 | 121 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 231 | 285 | 339 | 623 | 107 | 337 | 36 | 6 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 110 | 104 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 57 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 154 | 200 | 260 | 460 | 106 | 296 | 52 | 5 | 187 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 43 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 220 | 256 | 341 | 597 | 122 | 332 | 37 | 5 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 1 | — | 269 | 247 | 50 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 62 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 202 | 254 | 296 | 549 | 93 | 251 | 23 | 3 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Tigers 1 | — | 269 | 242 | 80 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 51 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 331 | 386 | 508 | 895 | 178 | 386 | 19 | 5 | 389 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers East | — | 184 | 168 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 106 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 101 | 175 | 196 | 371 | 95 | 220 | 58 | 4 | 163 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers East | — | 184 | 163 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 73 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 184 | 273 | 356 | 629 | 172 | 274 | 40 | 7 | 284 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 215 | 199 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 96 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 186 | 239 | 286 | 526 | 101 | 320 | 45 | 6 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 215 | 192 | 53 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 67 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 276 | 347 | 453 | 801 | 177 | 373 | 31 | 9 | 353 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 153 | 145 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 166 | 209 | 255 | 464 | 90 | 314 | 48 | 5 | 202 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 153 | 141 | 34 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 241 | 301 | 397 | 698 | 156 | 353 | 34 | 8 | 311 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 1 | — | 269 | 250 | 50 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 62 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 200 | 254 | 292 | 546 | 92 | 238 | 23 | 3 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers East | — | 184 | 167 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 106 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 102 | 175 | 198 | 372 | 96 | 202 | 58 | 4 | 163 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 215 | 199 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 96 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 186 | 239 | 286 | 526 | 101 | 302 | 45 | 6 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 153 | 144 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 167 | 209 | 257 | 466 | 90 | 306 | 48 | 5 | 202 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 821 | 759 | 128 | 26 | 2 | 14 | 37 | 337 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 169 | 224 | 264 | 487 | 95 | 274 | 41 | 5 | 214 | 31 | -68 | -3 | +0 | +9 | +18 | -4.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 601 | 102 | 21 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 267 | 13 | 6 | 10 | 170 | 224 | 266 | 490 | 97 | 277 | 41 | 4 | 214 | 31 | -54 | -3 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -3.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 110 PAwOBA .278 → .187 (−91)K% 37.3% → 52.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 37.27% | ÷0.975 | ×1.360 | — | — | 51.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.18% | ÷1.089 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷0.957 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | — | 20.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.056 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | — | 6.88% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.67% | ÷1.020 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | — | 1.56% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.00% | ÷1.216 | ×0.800 | — | — | 3.29% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 143, 1B 91, 2B 111, 3B 104, K 95, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .278 → .187; ISO .158 → .093; BABIP .316 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Tigers · 43 PAwOBA .366 → .242 (−124)K% 25.6% → 37.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.58% | ÷0.972 | ×1.440 | — | — | 37.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.98% | ÷0.987 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 4.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.03% | ÷0.987 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.975 | 25.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.34% | ÷1.014 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 7.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.45% | ÷0.924 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 2.84% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 97, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .366 → .242; ISO .150 → .097; BABIP .429 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Tigers · 132 PAwOBA .393 → .280 (−113)K% 24.2% → 35.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷0.973 | ×1.440 | — | — | 35.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷0.978 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 5.68% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.76% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.54% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.94% | ÷1.018 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 27.45% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.06% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 5.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.990 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.88% | ÷0.990 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 4.57% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 104, 2B 88, 3B 98, K 95, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .393 → .280; ISO .179 → .126; BABIP .415 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 83 PAwOBA .274 → .164 (−109)K% 42.2% → 58.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 42.17% | ÷0.982 | ×1.360 | — | — | 58.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.64% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.76% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.50% | ÷1.009 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 20.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.50% | ÷0.974 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 2.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.039 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.279 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 6.35% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 108, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .274 → .164; ISO .173 → .082; BABIP .278 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Tigers East · 184 PAwOBA .276 → .163 (−112)K% 39.7% → 57.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 39.67% | ÷0.992 | ×1.440 | — | — | 57.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.98% | ÷1.025 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 3.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.35% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 3.11% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.78% | ÷1.056 | ×0.820 | ×1.001 | ×0.995 | 13.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.78% | ÷1.026 | ×0.720 | ×1.001 | ×0.995 | 5.44% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.040 | ×0.720 | ×1.001 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.78% | ÷0.920 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 6.56% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 111, 2B 105, 3B 108, K 98, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .276 → .163; ISO .172 → .101; BABIP .274 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 DSLDSL Tigers 1 · 269 PAwOBA .384 → .237 (−147)K% 19.0% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.96% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 3.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.97% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 17.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.47% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 6.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.30% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 1.74% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .384 → .237; ISO .178 → .094; BABIP .386 → .238. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).