Andrew Moritz
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | A+Rome Braves | 284 | .280/.332/.322 | 1 | 10 | 53 | — | .239/.279/.276 |
| 2022 | 25 | AA/A+2 orgs | 370 | .283/.374/.362 | 2 | 7 | 75 | — | .249/.314/.317 |
| 2023 | 26 | AA/INTL2 orgs | 303 | .250/.332/.336 | 3 | 6 | 78 | — | .198/.268/.278 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | ROK | Danville Braves | — | 144 | 125 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 24 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 280 | 357 | 376 | 733 | 96 | 333 | 17 | 10 | 324 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A+ | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 181 | 171 | 49 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 287 | 322 | 316 | 638 | 29 | 340 | 15 | 5 | 290 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A | Rome Braves | — | 217 | 199 | 46 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 33 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 231 | 275 | 266 | 541 | 35 | 272 | 15 | 4 | 243 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ | Rome Braves | — | 284 | 261 | 73 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 48 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 280 | 332 | 322 | 654 | 42 | 338 | 17 | 7 | 299 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 343 | 302 | 86 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 35 | 69 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 285 | 362 | 364 | 726 | 79 | 359 | 20 | 10 | 329 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | A+ | Rome Braves | — | 27 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 250 | 538 | 312 | 851 | 62 | 267 | 7 | 33 | 408 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 139 | 122 | 27 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 31 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 221 | 312 | 303 | 615 | 82 | 286 | 22 | 10 | 283 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | INTL | Canberra Cavalry | — | 164 | 146 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 274 | 350 | 363 | 713 | 89 | 328 | 17 | 10 | 323 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 144 | 130 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 34 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 223 | 279 | 300 | 579 | 77 | 269 | 24 | 6 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A+ MLE | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 181 | 174 | 41 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 37 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 236 | 261 | 259 | 520 | 23 | 294 | 20 | 3 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 217 | 202 | 39 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 44 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 193 | 227 | 223 | 450 | 30 | 230 | 20 | 3 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rome Braves | — | 284 | 268 | 64 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 68 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 239 | 279 | 276 | 555 | 37 | 313 | 24 | 5 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 343 | 314 | 78 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 84 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 248 | 306 | 318 | 624 | 70 | 325 | 24 | 7 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | A+ MLE | Rome Braves | — | 27 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 250 | 423 | 300 | 723 | 50 | 231 | 11 | 19 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 139 | 126 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 37 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 198 | 268 | 278 | 546 | 79 | 256 | 27 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 144 | 130 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 34 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 223 | 279 | 300 | 579 | 77 | 289 | 24 | 6 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK RAW | Danville Braves | — | 144 | 125 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 24 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 280 | 357 | 376 | 733 | 96 | 333 | 17 | 10 | 324 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 398 | 376 | 79 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 81 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 210 | 240 | 234 | 474 | 24 | 265 | 20 | 3 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 398 | 370 | 95 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 60 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 257 | 297 | 289 | 586 | 32 | 304 | 15 | 5 | 264 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rome Braves | — | 284 | 268 | 64 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 68 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 239 | 279 | 276 | 555 | 37 | 315 | 24 | 5 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ RAW | Rome Braves | — | 284 | 261 | 73 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 48 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 280 | 332 | 322 | 654 | 42 | 338 | 17 | 7 | 299 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 370 | 334 | 82 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 87 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 246 | 311 | 314 | 626 | 69 | 321 | 24 | 8 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 370 | 318 | 90 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 44 | 71 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 283 | 374 | 362 | 736 | 79 | 353 | 19 | 12 | 335 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 303 | 276 | 53 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 80 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 192 | 259 | 264 | 524 | 72 | 262 | 26 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | INTL RAW | 2 teams | — | 303 | 268 | 67 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 30 | 59 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 250 | 332 | 336 | 668 | 86 | 309 | 19 | 10 | 305 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 144 | 133 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 34 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 218 | 279 | 293 | 572 | 75 | 269 | 24 | 6 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 398 | 380 | 79 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 81 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 208 | 240 | 232 | 472 | 24 | 259 | 20 | 3 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rome Braves | — | 284 | 267 | 64 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 68 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 240 | 279 | 277 | 556 | 37 | 313 | 24 | 5 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 370 | 335 | 82 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 87 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 245 | 311 | 313 | 625 | 69 | 318 | 24 | 8 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 26 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 303 | 275 | 53 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 80 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 193 | 259 | 265 | 525 | 73 | 256 | 26 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1499 | 1384 | 307 | 40 | 7 | 6 | 86 | 350 | 11 | 42 | 16 | 222 | 273 | 274 | 547 | 52 | 290 | 23 | 6 | 243 | 50 | -89 | +2 | +0 | -9 | +32 | -6.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 600 | 133 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 152 | 5 | 18 | 7 | 222 | 273 | 275 | 548 | 53 | 289 | 23 | 6 | 243 | 50 | -38 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAMississippi Braves · 139 PAwOBA .279 → .237 (−41)K% 22.3% → 26.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.30% | ÷1.034 | ×1.220 | — | — | 26.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.07% | ÷0.943 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.978 | 7.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.44% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.978 | 1.18% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.016 | ×0.920 | ×1.005 | ×0.978 | 20.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.30% | ÷0.997 | ×0.910 | ×1.005 | ×0.978 | 2.96% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.20% | ÷0.900 | ×0.880 | ×1.005 | ×0.978 | 2.11% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.10% | ÷0.793 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 1.08% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 59, 1B 103, 2B 99, 3B 80, K 107, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.
Result: wOBA .279 → .237; ISO .082 → .078; BABIP .286 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAMississippi Braves · 343 PAwOBA .324 → .276 (−47)K% 20.1% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.20% | ÷0.985 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.988 | 6.96% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.58% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.988 | 0.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.76% | ÷1.020 | ×0.920 | ×1.019 | ×0.988 | 26.12% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.87% | ÷1.032 | ×0.910 | ×1.019 | ×0.988 | 6.10% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.43% | ÷0.900 | ×0.880 | ×1.019 | ×0.988 | 0.42% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.86% | ÷0.927 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.73% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 104, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 100, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.
Result: wOBA .324 → .276; ISO .079 → .071; BABIP .359 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Rome Braves · 27 PAwOBA .416 → .320 (−96)K% 7.4% → 10.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 7.41% | ÷0.970 | ×1.310 | — | — | 10.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 33.33% | ÷1.052 | ×0.600 | — | ×0.968 | 18.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.70% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.968 | 2.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.43% | ÷0.956 | ×0.870 | — | ×0.968 | 18.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷0.984 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.968 | 5.48% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | — | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.928 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 91, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .416 → .320; ISO .062 → .064; BABIP .267 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Rome Braves · 284 PAwOBA .293 → .247 (−46)K% 16.9% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.90% | ÷0.957 | ×1.350 | — | — | 23.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.04% | ÷0.991 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 4.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.35% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.978 | 0.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.05% | ÷1.001 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 28.04% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.76% | ÷0.982 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 3.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.47% | ÷0.864 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.978 | 0.44% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 100, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 91, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .293 → .247; ISO .042 → .035; BABIP .338 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ARome Braves · 217 PAwOBA .240 → .194 (−46)K% 15.2% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.21% | ÷1.001 | ×1.340 | — | — | 20.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.15% | ÷0.982 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 2.76% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.38% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 1.05% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.10% | ÷1.007 | ×0.920 | ×0.955 | ×0.990 | 20.81% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.01% | ÷1.080 | ×0.820 | ×0.955 | ×0.990 | 2.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×0.955 | ×0.990 | 0.47% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.851 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 101, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 100, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.955.
Result: wOBA .240 → .194; ISO .035 → .026; BABIP .272 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Florida Fire Frogs · 181 PAwOBA .280 → .228 (−52)K% 14.9% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.92% | ÷1.036 | ×1.420 | — | — | 20.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.42% | ÷1.057 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.998 | 3.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.56% | ÷1.005 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 26.52% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.47% | ÷1.115 | ×0.960 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 2.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.033 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.920 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 101, 2B 123, 3B 107, K 107, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .280 → .228; ISO .029 → .023; BABIP .340 → .294. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKDanville Braves · 144 PAwOBA .321 → .243 (−78)K% 16.7% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.67% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 23.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.72% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 6.07% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.69% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 0.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.015 | ×0.975 | 21.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.015 | ×0.975 | 5.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.015 | ×0.975 | 0.73% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 0.77% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.
Result: wOBA .321 → .243; ISO .096 → .071; BABIP .333 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .