Nick Mikolajchak
P Wichita Wind Surge| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27 | AAACLE | 26 | 0 | 30 | 4.75 | 5.90 | 18.4% | 14.0% | — | K 15.8% · BB 12.6% · FIP 5.80 |
| 2026 | 28 | AAMIN | 9 | 0 | 12 | 7.71 | 8.76 | 7.3% | 5.5% | — | K 5.9% · BB 6.0% · FIP 9.35 |
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBMIN | — | — | 0 | 5.42 | 5.42 | 15.0% | 9.8% | — | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 30 | MLBMIN | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5.42 | 5.49 | 15.5% | 10.0% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Indians Blue | 4 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -1.12 | — |
| 2019 | 21 | ROK RAW | AZL Indians Blue | 4 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.90 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 30 | 0 | 40 | 162 | 57 | 9 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 28.5% | 6.1% | 22.4% | 5.8% | 3.18 | 4.66 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | 30 | 0 | 40 | 162 | 57 | 9 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 35.2% | 5.6% | 29.6% | 4.3% | 3.18 | 3.20 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 47 | 0 | 50 | 212 | 50 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 13.9% | 6.9% | 1.6% | 3.04 | 3.96 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 47 | 0 | 50 | 212 | 50 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.6% | 13.2% | 10.4% | 1.4% | 3.04 | 3.56 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 32 | 0 | 36 | 163 | 26 | 21 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 13.7% | 11.6% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 3.50 | 4.81 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 32 | 0 | 36 | 163 | 26 | 21 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 13.7% | 11.6% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 3.50 | 4.81 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 32 | 0 | 36 | 163 | 26 | 21 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.0% | 12.9% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 3.50 | 4.85 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 26 | 0 | 30 | 136 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 15.8% | 12.6% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 4.75 | 5.80 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 26 | 0 | 30 | 136 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 15.8% | 12.6% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 4.75 | 5.80 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 26 | 0 | 30 | 136 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.4% | 14.0% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.75 | 5.90 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 9 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.9% | 6.0% | -0.1% | 10.9% | 7.71 | 9.35 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 9 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.9% | 6.0% | -0.1% | 10.9% | 7.71 | 9.35 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AA RAW | Wichita Wind Surge | 9 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 7.3% | 5.5% | 1.8% | 9.1% | 7.71 | 8.76 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | MIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.0% | 9.8% | 5.2% | 3.6% | 5.42 | 5.42 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIN | 15 | 0 | 16 | 65 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.5% | 10.0% | 5.4% | 3.7% | 5.42 | 5.49 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIN | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.5% | 10.0% | 5.4% | 3.7% | 5.42 | 5.49 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.5% | 10.0% | 5.4% | 3.7% | 5.42 | 5.11 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 124 | 82 | 41 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.5% | 10.0% | 5.4% | 3.7% | 5.42 | 5.11 | -1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 148 | 0 | 174 | 752 | 149 | 79 | 29 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.8% | 10.5% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 3.67 | 4.86 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 170 | 0 | 200 | 864 | 172 | 90 | 33 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.8% | 10.5% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 3.67 | 4.86 | -2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAWichita Wind Surge · 12 IPFIP 8.17 → 9.35 (+1.18)K% 7.3% → 5.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 7.27% | — | ×0.810 | 5.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.45% | — | ×1.100 | 6.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 9.09% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 10.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 8.17 → 9.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 30 IPFIP 5.74 → 5.80 (+0.06)K% 18.4% → 15.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.38% | — | ×0.860 | 15.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.97% | — | ×0.900 | 12.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.41% | ÷1.093 | ×1.100 | 4.44% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 5.74 → 5.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 36 IPFIP 4.73 → 4.81 (+0.08)K% 16.0% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.95% | — | ×0.860 | 13.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.88% | — | ×0.900 | 11.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.45% | ÷1.060 | ×1.100 | 2.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.73 → 4.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAColumbus Clippers · 50 IPFIP 3.56 → 3.96 (+0.40)K% 23.6% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.58% | — | ×0.880 | 20.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.21% | — | ×1.050 | 13.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.42% | ÷1.001 | ×1.100 | 1.56% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.56 → 3.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAAkron RubberDucks · 40 IPFIP 3.20 → 4.66 (+1.45)K% 35.2% → 28.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.19% | — | ×0.810 | 28.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.56% | — | ×1.100 | 6.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.32% | ÷0.893 | ×1.200 | 5.81% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 79).
Result: FIP 3.20 → 4.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKAZL Indians Blue · 6 IPFIP -1.12 → 0.23 (+1.35)K% 50.0% → 34.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 50.00% | — | ×0.680 | 34.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP -1.12 → 0.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).