Andres Melendez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 17 | ROKAZL Brewers | 175 | .282/.371/.383 | 1 | 4 | 59 | — | .219/.288/.290 |
| 2019 | 18 | ROKAZL Brewers G… | 147 | .250/.342/.352 | 1 | 0 | 36 | — | .179/.247/.254 |
| 2021 | 20 | ALynchburg Hil… | 289 | .247/.371/.431 | 8 | 2 | 76 | — | .198/.294/.337 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 17 | ROK | AZL Brewers | — | 175 | 149 | 42 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 282 | 371 | 383 | 753 | 101 | 306 | 10 | 10 | 334 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK | AZL Brewers Gold | — | 147 | 128 | 32 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 250 | 342 | 352 | 694 | 102 | 298 | 16 | 11 | 316 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 289 | 239 | 59 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 44 | 80 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 247 | 371 | 431 | 802 | 184 | 331 | 28 | 15 | 357 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers | — | 175 | 155 | 34 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 219 | 288 | 290 | 579 | 71 | 241 | 15 | 6 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers Gold | — | 147 | 134 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 179 | 247 | 254 | 500 | 75 | 229 | 24 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 289 | 252 | 50 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 108 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 294 | 337 | 631 | 139 | 303 | 37 | 11 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers | — | 175 | 155 | 34 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 219 | 288 | 290 | 579 | 71 | 250 | 15 | 6 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK RAW | AZL Brewers | — | 175 | 149 | 42 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 282 | 371 | 383 | 753 | 101 | 306 | 10 | 10 | 334 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers Gold | — | 147 | 134 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 179 | 247 | 254 | 500 | 75 | 232 | 24 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | AZL Brewers Gold | — | 147 | 128 | 32 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 250 | 342 | 352 | 694 | 102 | 298 | 16 | 11 | 316 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 289 | 252 | 50 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 108 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 294 | 337 | 631 | 139 | 312 | 37 | 11 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 289 | 239 | 59 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 44 | 80 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 247 | 371 | 431 | 802 | 184 | 331 | 28 | 15 | 357 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers | — | 175 | 158 | 34 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 215 | 288 | 285 | 573 | 70 | 241 | 15 | 6 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | AZL Brewers Gold | — | 147 | 134 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 179 | 247 | 254 | 500 | 75 | 229 | 24 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 289 | 253 | 50 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 108 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 294 | 336 | 630 | 138 | 303 | 37 | 11 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 611 | 541 | 108 | 22 | 5 | 8 | 52 | 169 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 200 | 281 | 303 | 584 | 104 | 269 | 28 | 9 | 259 | 62 | -28 | -0 | +0 | +11 | +13 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 576 | 115 | 23 | 5 | 9 | 55 | 180 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 200 | 281 | 304 | 585 | 104 | 268 | 28 | 8 | 259 | 62 | -30 | -0 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 ALynchburg Hillcats · 289 PAwOBA .352 → .280 (−72)K% 27.7% → 37.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.68% | ÷1.008 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.22% | ÷1.024 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 10.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.04% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.83% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.75% | ÷1.014 | ×0.920 | ×1.016 | ×1.030 | 19.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.06% | ÷0.988 | ×0.830 | ×1.016 | ×1.030 | 8.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.26% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.016 | ×1.030 | 1.04% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.03% | ÷0.950 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 4.36% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.
Result: wOBA .352 → .280; ISO .184 → .149; BABIP .331 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKAZL Brewers Gold · 147 PAwOBA .311 → .222 (−89)K% 16.3% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 23.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 6.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.36% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 1.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 16.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 5.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 0.67% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 0.77% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .311 → .222; ISO .102 → .071; BABIP .298 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKAZL Brewers · 175 PAwOBA .333 → .256 (−77)K% 10.3% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.29% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 14.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.038 | 6.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.29% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.038 | 1.71% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.038 | 19.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.038 | 3.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.038 | 1.63% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.038 | 0.62% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 19.5 → +3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .333 → .256; ISO .101 → .076; BABIP .306 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).