Nick Hutchins

PosC
B/TR/R
Born1995-11-17
Age (2027)31
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
ALAST SEASON 2019
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201721A/ROK2 orgs71.254/.319/.4602042—.184/.230/.353
201822ROKIdaho Falls C…207.292/.382/.5177069—.203/.270/.353
201923AA/A2 orgs295.256/.295/.3795334—.197/.229/.290
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201721 ALexington Legends — 3431 6201 0141 00 194219355574 161294 410 238 5 — — — — — —
201721 ROKBurlington Royals — 3732 10311 4101 00 312405562968 250429 2711 422 76 — — — — — —
201822 ROKIdaho Falls Chukars — 207178 521907 20406 00 292382517899 225336 1910 391 69 — — — — — —
201923 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals — 3332 7100 0140 10 219219250469 31389 420 203 -16 — — — — — —
201923 ALexington Legends — 262245 641805 9596 22 261304396700 135322 233 310 40 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201721 A MLELexington Legends — 3431 4101 0191 00 129156258414 129265 560 175 5 — — — — — —
201721 ROK MLEBurlington Royals — 3734 8211 2141 00 235297441738 206329 385 280 76 — — — — — —
201822 ROK MLEIdaho Falls Chukars — 207187 381305 11586 00 203270353623 150254 285 270 69 — — — — — —
201923 AA MLENorthwest Arkansas Naturals — 3332 5100 0180 10 156156188344 31335 550 144 -16 — — — — — —
201923 A MLELexington Legends — 262248 501304 6746 22 202238302541 101261 282 228 40 — — — — — —
201721 ROK MLE2 teams — 7165 11311 2332 00 169217292510 123312 463 230 42 — — — — — —
201721 ROK RAW2 teams — 7163 16512 4242 00 254319460779 206368 346 334 42 — — — — — —
201822 ROK MLEIdaho Falls Chukars — 207187 381305 11586 00 203270353623 150260 285 270 69 — — — — — —
201822 ROK RAWIdaho Falls Chukars — 207178 521907 20406 00 292382517899 225336 1910 391 69 — — — — — —
201923 A MLE2 teams — 295280 551404 6926 32 196229289519 93274 312 219 34 — — — — — —
201923 A RAW2 teams — 295277 711905 9736 32 256295379674 123328 253 298 34 — — — — — —
201721 ROK MLE2 teams — 7167 11311 2332 00 164217284501 119298 463 230 42 — — — — — —
201822 ROK MLEIdaho Falls Chukars — 207188 381305 11586 00 202270351621 149254 285 270 69 — — — — — —
201923 A MLE2 teams — 295281 551404 6926 32 196229288518 93269 312 219 34 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 573532 10430110 1918314 32 195242312555 117272 323 239 48 -36 -0 +0 +10 +12 -1.4
/ 162G— MLE — 650603 11734111 2220816 32 194242308550 114271 323 239 48 -41 -0 +0 +12 +14 -1.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 ALexington Legends · 262 PAwOBA .304 → .228 (−76)K% 22.5% → 28.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA22.52%÷1.066×1.340——28.30%
BB% (unintentional) /PA3.44%÷1.047×0.660—×0.9802.12%
HBP% /PA2.29%—×0.770—×0.9801.73%
Singles /BIP22.04%÷1.015×0.920×0.950×0.98018.59%
Doubles /BIP9.68%÷1.020×0.820×0.950×0.9807.24%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.013×0.940×0.950×0.9800.00%
Home runs /BIP2.69%÷1.095×0.820—×0.9801.97%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 103, 2B 104, 3B 103, K 113, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .304 → .228; ISO .135 → .095; BABIP .322 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 33 PAwOBA .198 → .144 (−54)K% 42.4% → 53.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA42.42%÷0.962×1.220——53.79%
BB% (unintentional) /PA0.00%÷1.001×0.700—×1.0120.00%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.870—×1.0120.00%
Singles /BIP33.33%÷1.083×0.920—×1.01228.66%
Doubles /BIP5.56%÷0.986×0.840—×1.0124.79%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.091×0.940—×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.901×0.800—×1.0120.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 117, 2B 97, 3B 118, K 92, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .198 → .144; ISO .031 → .023; BABIP .389 → .335. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ROKIdaho Falls Chukars · 207 PAwOBA .384 → .270 (−114)K% 19.3% → 27.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.32%÷1.000×1.440——27.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.18%÷1.000×0.610—×0.9655.40%
HBP% /PA2.90%—×0.720—×0.9652.01%
Singles /BIP18.84%÷1.000×0.820×1.022×0.96515.24%
Doubles /BIP13.77%÷1.000×0.720×1.022×0.9659.78%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.720×1.022×0.9650.00%
Home runs /BIP5.07%÷1.000×0.750—×0.9653.67%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .384 → .270; ISO .225 → .157; BABIP .336 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKBurlington Royals · 37 PAwOBA .403 → .280 (−123)K% 27.0% → 38.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA27.03%÷1.000×1.420——38.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.11%÷1.000×0.640—×0.9755.06%
HBP% /PA2.70%—×0.740—×0.9751.95%
Singles /BIP22.73%÷1.000×0.840—×0.97518.61%
Doubles /BIP13.64%÷1.000×0.740—×0.9759.84%
Triples /BIP4.55%÷1.000×0.740—×0.9753.28%
Home runs /BIP4.55%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9753.55%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .403 → .280; ISO .250 → .171; BABIP .429 → .329. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ALexington Legends · 34 PAwOBA .238 → .175 (−63)K% 41.2% → 55.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA41.18%÷0.991×1.340——55.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA0.00%÷1.053×0.660——0.00%
HBP% /PA2.94%—×0.770——2.26%
Singles /BIP17.65%÷0.936×0.920——17.34%
Doubles /BIP11.76%÷0.982×0.820——9.82%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.125×0.940——0.00%
Home runs /BIP5.88%÷1.062×0.820——4.54%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 87, 2B 96, 3B 125, K 98, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .238 → .175; ISO .161 → .108; BABIP .294 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).