Julio Gonzalez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 22 | ROKIdaho Falls C… | 238 | .289/.397/.371 | 0 | 13 | 61 | — | .227/.297/.284 |
| 2018 | 23 | A/ROK2 orgs | 165 | .220/.321/.298 | 0 | 3 | 27 | — | .175/.240/.229 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 238 | 197 | 57 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 33 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 289 | 397 | 371 | 767 | 81 | 345 | 14 | 15 | 344 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A | Lexington Legends | — | 21 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 235 | 381 | 294 | 675 | 59 | 333 | 24 | 19 | 323 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | ROK | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 144 | 124 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 218 | 312 | 298 | 610 | 81 | 250 | 12 | 11 | 278 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 238 | 211 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 48 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 227 | 297 | 284 | 582 | 57 | 282 | 20 | 9 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Lexington Legends | — | 21 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 222 | 333 | 278 | 611 | 56 | 278 | 33 | 14 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | ROK MLE | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 144 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 168 | 227 | 221 | 448 | 53 | 201 | 17 | 6 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 238 | 211 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 48 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 227 | 297 | 284 | 582 | 57 | 293 | 20 | 9 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK RAW | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 238 | 197 | 57 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 33 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 289 | 397 | 371 | 767 | 81 | 345 | 14 | 15 | 344 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 165 | 149 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 31 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 174 | 241 | 228 | 469 | 54 | 218 | 19 | 7 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 165 | 141 | 31 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 220 | 321 | 298 | 619 | 78 | 258 | 13 | 12 | 283 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Idaho Falls Chukars | — | 238 | 215 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 48 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 223 | 297 | 279 | 576 | 56 | 282 | 20 | 9 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 165 | 151 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 31 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 172 | 241 | 225 | 466 | 53 | 211 | 19 | 7 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 403 | 360 | 74 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 33 | 79 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 206 | 274 | 261 | 535 | 56 | 261 | 20 | 8 | 237 | 47 | -25 | +2 | +0 | +4 | +9 | -1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 581 | 119 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 53 | 127 | 2 | 26 | 6 | 205 | 274 | 258 | 532 | 53 | 260 | 20 | 8 | 237 | 47 | -41 | +3 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2018 ROKIdaho Falls Chukars · 144 PAwOBA .273 → .204 (−69)K% 11.8% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.81% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 17.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.965 | 6.54% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.69% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.965 | 15.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.965 | 2.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.80% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.965 | 2.05% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .273 → .204; ISO .081 → .060; BABIP .250 → .201. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ALexington Legends · 21 PAwOBA .316 → .234 (−83)K% 23.8% → 31.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.81% | ÷1.000 | ×1.340 | — | — | 31.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.05% | ÷1.016 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 12.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.047 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.990 | 21.76% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.112 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 6.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.051 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 109, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 100, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .316 → .234; ISO .059 → .042; BABIP .333 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKIdaho Falls Chukars · 238 PAwOBA .338 → .258 (−80)K% 13.9% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.87% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 19.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.975 | 8.75% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 22.52% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.10% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 4.49% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 1.35% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .338 → .258; ISO .081 → .062; BABIP .345 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).