Cameron Baranek
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 22 | ROKGCL Marlins | 124 | .234/.309/.351 | 1 | 6 | 19 | — | .157/.211/.235 |
| 2018 | 23 | A+/A2 orgs | 322 | .244/.310/.347 | 6 | 11 | 50 | — | .209/.257/.296 |
| 2019 | 24 | A+MIA | 141 | .168/.227/.214 | 0 | 6 | -14 | — | .120/.170/.158 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 124 | 111 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 234 | 309 | 351 | 660 | 117 | 309 | 24 | 7 | 297 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 212 | 197 | 41 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 60 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 208 | 261 | 284 | 545 | 76 | 287 | 28 | 6 | 248 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 110 | 94 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 319 | 407 | 479 | 886 | 160 | 356 | 17 | 12 | 389 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 141 | 131 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 44 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 168 | 227 | 214 | 441 | 46 | 253 | 31 | 6 | 207 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 124 | 115 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 157 | 211 | 235 | 446 | 78 | 236 | 35 | 4 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 212 | 200 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 84 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 165 | 209 | 235 | 444 | 70 | 267 | 40 | 5 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 110 | 99 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 293 | 352 | 414 | 766 | 121 | 352 | 24 | 7 | 333 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 141 | 133 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 62 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 120 | 170 | 158 | 328 | 38 | 219 | 44 | 4 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 124 | 115 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 157 | 211 | 235 | 446 | 78 | 236 | 35 | 4 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK RAW | GCL Marlins | — | 124 | 111 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 234 | 309 | 351 | 660 | 117 | 309 | 24 | 7 | 297 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 322 | 299 | 62 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 111 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 207 | 257 | 294 | 551 | 87 | 306 | 34 | 6 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 322 | 291 | 71 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 79 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 244 | 310 | 347 | 657 | 103 | 311 | 25 | 8 | 296 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 141 | 133 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 62 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 120 | 170 | 158 | 328 | 38 | 225 | 44 | 4 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ RAW | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 141 | 131 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 44 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 168 | 227 | 214 | 441 | 46 | 253 | 31 | 6 | 207 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 124 | 115 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 157 | 211 | 235 | 446 | 78 | 236 | 35 | 4 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 322 | 299 | 62 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 111 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 207 | 257 | 294 | 551 | 87 | 296 | 34 | 6 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 141 | 132 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 62 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 121 | 170 | 159 | 329 | 38 | 219 | 44 | 4 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 587 | 547 | 96 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 216 | 7 | 23 | 12 | 176 | 226 | 249 | 475 | 73 | 274 | 37 | 5 | 210 | 28 | -50 | -0 | +0 | -4 | +13 | -4.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 606 | 107 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 32 | 239 | 8 | 25 | 13 | 177 | 228 | 251 | 478 | 74 | 275 | 37 | 5 | 210 | 28 | -55 | -0 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -4.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 141 PAwOBA .202 → .148 (−54)K% 31.2% → 44.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.21% | ÷1.007 | ×1.420 | — | — | 44.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.67% | ÷0.998 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.988 | 4.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.42% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.988 | 1.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.39% | ÷1.045 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 15.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.90% | ÷0.931 | ×0.960 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 6.68% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.120 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.803 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 61, 1B 109, 2B 86, 3B 124, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .202 → .148; ISO .046 → .036; BABIP .253 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 212 PAwOBA .243 → .195 (−48)K% 28.3% → 39.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.30% | ÷1.009 | ×1.420 | — | — | 39.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.13% | ÷0.967 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.998 | 4.75% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.47% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.998 | 0.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.63% | ÷1.018 | ×0.920 | ×1.005 | ×0.998 | 20.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.11% | ÷0.903 | ×0.960 | ×1.005 | ×0.998 | 5.45% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.73% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×1.005 | ×0.998 | 0.52% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.46% | ÷0.850 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 1.51% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 104, 2B 80, 3B 130, K 102, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.
Result: wOBA .243 → .195; ISO .076 → .065; BABIP .287 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 110 PAwOBA .386 → .333 (−53)K% 17.3% → 24.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.27% | ÷0.966 | ×1.340 | — | — | 23.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.82% | ÷1.006 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 7.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.91% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 0.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.67% | ÷0.945 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 31.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.00% | ÷0.909 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 3.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.33% | ÷1.117 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 3.88% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 89, 2B 82, 3B 130, K 93, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .386 → .333; ISO .160 → .122; BABIP .356 → .352. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKGCL Marlins · 124 PAwOBA .292 → .197 (−96)K% 24.2% → 34.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.19% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 34.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 4.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.42% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 1.70% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.998 | ×0.975 | 16.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.998 | ×0.975 | 5.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.47% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.998 | ×0.975 | 1.73% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 0.94% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.
Result: wOBA .292 → .197; ISO .117 → .076; BABIP .309 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).