Nathan Perry
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 19 | ROKGCL Astros | 104 | .244/.340/.356 | 0 | 1 | 34 | — | .168/.233/.232 |
| 2021 | 22 | AHOU | 212 | .220/.324/.385 | 5 | 1 | 43 | — | .164/.248/.270 |
| 2022 | 23 | ATB | 181 | .230/.307/.360 | 5 | 1 | 48 | — | .187/.246/.283 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 18 | ROK | GCL Astros | — | 83 | 70 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 229 | 333 | 357 | 690 | 129 | 250 | 17 | 12 | 309 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK | GCL Astros | — | 104 | 90 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 244 | 340 | 356 | 695 | 111 | 310 | 19 | 12 | 315 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 212 | 182 | 40 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 45 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 220 | 324 | 385 | 708 | 165 | 261 | 21 | 10 | 318 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 181 | 161 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 230 | 307 | 360 | 668 | 130 | 250 | 17 | 9 | 300 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 83 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 247 | 284 | 531 | 108 | 207 | 24 | 7 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 104 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 168 | 233 | 232 | 465 | 63 | 241 | 28 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 212 | 189 | 31 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 61 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 164 | 248 | 270 | 517 | 106 | 214 | 29 | 7 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 181 | 166 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 187 | 246 | 283 | 529 | 96 | 220 | 23 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 83 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 247 | 284 | 531 | 108 | 204 | 24 | 7 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Astros | — | 83 | 70 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 229 | 333 | 357 | 690 | 129 | 250 | 17 | 12 | 309 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 104 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 168 | 233 | 232 | 465 | 63 | 239 | 28 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK RAW | GCL Astros | — | 104 | 90 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 244 | 340 | 356 | 695 | 111 | 310 | 19 | 12 | 315 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 212 | 189 | 31 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 61 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 164 | 248 | 270 | 517 | 106 | 220 | 29 | 7 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A RAW | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 212 | 182 | 40 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 45 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 220 | 324 | 385 | 708 | 165 | 261 | 21 | 10 | 318 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 181 | 166 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 187 | 246 | 283 | 529 | 96 | 220 | 23 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 181 | 161 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 230 | 307 | 360 | 668 | 130 | 250 | 17 | 9 | 300 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 83 | 76 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 171 | 247 | 276 | 523 | 105 | 207 | 24 | 7 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 104 | 95 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 168 | 233 | 232 | 465 | 63 | 241 | 28 | 7 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 212 | 189 | 31 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 61 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 164 | 248 | 270 | 517 | 106 | 214 | 29 | 7 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 181 | 166 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 187 | 246 | 283 | 529 | 96 | 220 | 23 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 580 | 524 | 91 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 151 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 174 | 244 | 269 | 513 | 95 | 221 | 26 | 7 | 232 | 43 | -39 | -0 | +0 | +10 | +13 | -1.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 101 | 21 | 2 | 10 | 43 | 169 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 172 | 243 | 266 | 509 | 94 | 219 | 26 | 7 | 232 | 43 | -44 | -0 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 ACharleston RiverDogs · 181 PAwOBA .295 → .239 (−56)K% 16.6% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.57% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 22.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.84% | ÷0.983 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.14% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.10% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.85% | ÷0.970 | ×0.920 | ×0.979 | ×0.990 | 18.23% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.58% | ÷1.066 | ×0.830 | ×0.979 | ×0.990 | 3.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.053 | ×0.910 | ×0.979 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.82% | ÷0.943 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 3.21% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 94, 2B 113, 3B 111, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .295 → .239; ISO .130 → .103; BABIP .250 → .220. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 212 PAwOBA .312 → .232 (−80)K% 21.2% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.23% | ÷0.997 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.43% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.30% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 2.58% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.33% | ÷0.987 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 13.58% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.49% | ÷1.066 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | — | 7.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.73% | ÷1.084 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | — | 0.58% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.65% | ÷1.176 | ×0.800 | — | — | 2.48% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 135, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 117, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .312 → .232; ISO .165 → .113; BABIP .261 → .214. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Astros · 104 PAwOBA .310 → .219 (−91)K% 19.2% → 27.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.23% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 27.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.54% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 7.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.96% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.70% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.986 | ×1.008 | 16.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.986 | ×1.008 | 6.13% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.986 | ×1.008 | 2.04% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.
Result: wOBA .310 → .219; ISO .111 → .076; BABIP .310 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKGCL Astros · 83 PAwOBA .309 → .236 (−73)K% 16.9% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.87% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 7.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.20% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 0.89% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.022 | ×1.022 | 16.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.36% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.022 | 4.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 2.85% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .309 → .236; ISO .129 → .100; BABIP .250 → .207. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).