Freddvil Chevez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 19 | ROKGCL Rays | 272 | .297/.359/.394 | 4 | 0 | 53 | — | .223/.278/.295 |
| 2021 | 21 | ROKTB | 139 | .292/.366/.425 | 3 | 0 | 61 | — | .218/.276/.306 |
| 2022 | 22 | ATB | 117 | .157/.216/.222 | 1 | 0 | -8 | — | .126/.164/.180 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 17 | ROK | DSL Rays 2 | — | 250 | 217 | 48 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 51 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 221 | 316 | 323 | 638 | 101 | 271 | 20 | 10 | 292 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK | DSL Rays 2 | — | 269 | 243 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 52 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 214 | 285 | 329 | 614 | 115 | 250 | 19 | 6 | 278 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK | GCL Rays | — | 272 | 246 | 73 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 30 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 297 | 359 | 394 | 754 | 98 | 322 | 11 | 5 | 340 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 139 | 120 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 366 | 425 | 791 | 133 | 344 | 20 | 8 | 343 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 108 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 157 | 216 | 222 | 438 | 65 | 203 | 25 | 6 | 202 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 250 | 224 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 62 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 143 | 223 | 196 | 419 | 54 | 185 | 25 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 269 | 248 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 63 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 137 | 199 | 198 | 396 | 60 | 168 | 23 | 4 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 272 | 251 | 56 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 223 | 278 | 295 | 573 | 72 | 247 | 16 | 3 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 139 | 124 | 27 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 40 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 218 | 276 | 306 | 583 | 89 | 275 | 29 | 5 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 111 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 164 | 180 | 344 | 54 | 187 | 34 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 250 | 224 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 62 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 143 | 223 | 196 | 419 | 54 | 189 | 25 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 2 | — | 250 | 217 | 48 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 51 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 221 | 316 | 323 | 638 | 101 | 271 | 20 | 10 | 292 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 269 | 248 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 63 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 137 | 199 | 198 | 396 | 60 | 173 | 23 | 4 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 2 | — | 269 | 243 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 52 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 214 | 285 | 329 | 614 | 115 | 250 | 19 | 6 | 278 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 272 | 251 | 56 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 223 | 278 | 295 | 573 | 72 | 256 | 16 | 3 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK RAW | GCL Rays | — | 272 | 246 | 73 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 30 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 297 | 359 | 394 | 754 | 98 | 322 | 11 | 5 | 340 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 139 | 124 | 27 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 40 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 218 | 276 | 306 | 583 | 89 | 291 | 29 | 5 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 139 | 120 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 366 | 425 | 791 | 133 | 344 | 20 | 8 | 343 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 111 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 164 | 180 | 344 | 54 | 183 | 34 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 108 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 157 | 216 | 222 | 438 | 65 | 203 | 25 | 6 | 202 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 250 | 225 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 62 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 142 | 223 | 196 | 418 | 53 | 185 | 25 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 269 | 248 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 63 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 137 | 199 | 198 | 396 | 60 | 168 | 23 | 4 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 272 | 251 | 56 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 223 | 278 | 295 | 573 | 72 | 247 | 16 | 3 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 139 | 128 | 27 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 40 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 211 | 276 | 297 | 573 | 86 | 275 | 29 | 5 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 111 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 164 | 180 | 344 | 54 | 187 | 34 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1047 | 958 | 163 | 27 | 4 | 9 | 47 | 248 | 29 | 5 | 2 | 170 | 231 | 235 | 466 | 65 | 216 | 24 | 4 | 208 | 27 | -91 | +0 | +0 | -19 | +23 | -8.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 595 | 101 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 154 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 170 | 231 | 235 | 466 | 66 | 215 | 24 | 4 | 208 | 27 | -57 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -5.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 ACharleston RiverDogs · 117 PAwOBA .194 → .156 (−39)K% 24.8% → 34.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.79% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 34.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.13% | ÷0.983 | ×0.690 | — | — | 3.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.67% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.46% | ÷0.970 | ×0.920 | ×1.003 | — | 15.65% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.53% | ÷1.066 | ×0.830 | ×1.003 | — | 1.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.27% | ÷1.053 | ×0.910 | ×1.003 | — | 1.10% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.27% | ÷0.943 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.07% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 94, 2B 113, 3B 111, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.003.
Result: wOBA .194 → .156; ISO .065 → .049; BABIP .203 → .187. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Rays · 139 PAwOBA .344 → .258 (−86)K% 20.1% → 28.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.14% | ÷1.005 | ×1.440 | — | — | 28.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.91% | ÷0.999 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 4.84% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.16% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.53% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.17% | ÷0.990 | ×0.820 | ×1.016 | ×0.985 | 22.51% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.61% | ÷1.006 | ×0.720 | ×1.016 | ×0.985 | 5.44% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.065 | ×0.720 | ×1.016 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.26% | ÷0.948 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 2.64% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 98, 2B 101, 3B 113, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.
Result: wOBA .344 → .258; ISO .133 → .100; BABIP .344 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Rays · 272 PAwOBA .333 → .246 (−87)K% 11.0% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 15.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.78% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 2.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.04% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 2.93% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 21.07% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 3.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.46% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.32% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 1.46% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .333 → .246; ISO .098 → .071; BABIP .322 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 DSLDSL Rays 2 · 269 PAwOBA .273 → .177 (−96)K% 19.3% → 23.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 3.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.35% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.36% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.32% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.026 | ×1.008 | 12.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.026 | ×1.008 | 3.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.026 | ×1.008 | 0.32% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 1.24% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .273 → .177; ISO .115 → .062; BABIP .250 → .168. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 DSLDSL Rays 2 · 250 PAwOBA .288 → .195 (−94)K% 20.4% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.40% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 7.16% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.00% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 1.43% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.021 | ×1.022 | 14.12% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.021 | ×1.022 | 4.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.021 | ×1.022 | 0.38% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.022 | 0.87% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .288 → .195; ISO .101 → .058; BABIP .271 → .185. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).