Channy Ortiz
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 22 | AARI | 99 | .256/.340/.267 | 0 | 3 | 36 | — | .213/.278/.225 |
| 2022 | 23 | A+/AARI | 301 | .204/.314/.306 | 2 | 6 | 42 | — | .174/.264/.257 |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ARI | 273 | .237/.307/.322 | 2 | 6 | 45 | — | .206/.259/.286 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | A | Visalia Rawhide | — | 99 | 86 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 256 | 340 | 267 | 608 | 12 | 373 | 28 | 10 | 283 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A+ | Hillsboro Hops | — | 235 | 201 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 52 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 224 | 325 | 323 | 648 | 100 | 289 | 22 | 11 | 295 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A | Visalia Rawhide | — | 66 | 54 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 130 | 277 | 241 | 518 | 111 | 206 | 32 | 11 | 248 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ | Hillsboro Hops | — | 273 | 245 | 58 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 54 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 237 | 307 | 322 | 630 | 86 | 293 | 20 | 8 | 285 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 99 | 89 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 39 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 213 | 278 | 225 | 503 | 11 | 340 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | — | 235 | 208 | 40 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 67 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 192 | 273 | 274 | 547 | 82 | 260 | 29 | 8 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 66 | 56 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 29 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 107 | 231 | 196 | 427 | 89 | 182 | 44 | 8 | 186 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | — | 273 | 252 | 52 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 74 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 206 | 259 | 286 | 545 | 79 | 272 | 27 | 5 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 99 | 89 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 39 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 213 | 278 | 225 | 503 | 11 | 373 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A RAW | Visalia Rawhide | — | 99 | 86 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 256 | 340 | 267 | 608 | 12 | 373 | 28 | 10 | 283 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 301 | 264 | 45 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 95 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 170 | 260 | 250 | 510 | 80 | 253 | 32 | 8 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 301 | 255 | 52 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 32 | 73 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 204 | 314 | 306 | 620 | 102 | 273 | 24 | 11 | 285 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | — | 273 | 252 | 52 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 74 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 206 | 259 | 286 | 545 | 79 | 281 | 27 | 5 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ RAW | Hillsboro Hops | — | 273 | 245 | 58 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 54 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 237 | 307 | 322 | 630 | 86 | 293 | 20 | 8 | 285 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 99 | 91 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 39 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 209 | 278 | 220 | 498 | 11 | 340 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 301 | 266 | 45 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 95 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 169 | 260 | 248 | 508 | 79 | 243 | 32 | 8 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | — | 273 | 253 | 52 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 74 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 206 | 259 | 285 | 544 | 79 | 272 | 27 | 5 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 673 | 605 | 116 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 45 | 208 | 13 | 15 | 9 | 192 | 262 | 261 | 524 | 69 | 281 | 31 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -47 | -1 | +0 | +7 | +15 | -2.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 112 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 43 | 201 | 13 | 14 | 9 | 192 | 263 | 262 | 524 | 70 | 281 | 31 | 7 | 230 | 42 | -45 | -1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 A+Hillsboro Hops · 273 PAwOBA .280 → .234 (−46)K% 19.8% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.78% | ÷0.987 | ×1.350 | — | — | 27.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.06% | ÷1.038 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 5.45% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.10% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.56% | ÷0.980 | ×0.910 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 22.08% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.66% | ÷0.947 | ×0.830 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 3.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.09% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 1.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.05% | ÷0.952 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 0.90% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 96, 2B 89, 3B 80, K 97, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .280 → .234; ISO .086 → .073; BABIP .293 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Hillsboro Hops · 235 PAwOBA .291 → .242 (−48)K% 22.1% → 28.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.13% | ÷1.046 | ×1.350 | — | — | 28.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.64% | ÷0.974 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.74% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.13% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.998 | 1.72% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.81% | ÷0.965 | ×0.910 | ×1.011 | ×0.998 | 19.80% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.71% | ÷1.100 | ×0.830 | ×1.011 | ×0.998 | 5.11% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.34% | ÷1.006 | ×0.820 | ×1.011 | ×0.998 | 1.10% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.34% | ÷0.848 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 1.31% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 93, 2B 120, 3B 101, K 109, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .291 → .242; ISO .100 → .082; BABIP .289 → .260. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AVisalia Rawhide · 66 PAwOBA .247 → .186 (−61)K% 31.8% → 43.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.82% | ÷1.001 | ×1.360 | — | — | 43.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.61% | ÷1.023 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 7.08% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.06% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 4.68% |
| Singles /BIP | 6.06% | ÷0.997 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.990 | 5.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.12% | ÷0.942 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.990 | 10.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.990 | 2.73% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.062 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 99, 2B 88, 3B 100, K 100, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .247 → .186; ISO .111 → .088; BABIP .206 → .182. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AVisalia Rawhide · 99 PAwOBA .279 → .221 (−58)K% 28.3% → 38.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.28% | ÷0.988 | ×1.360 | — | — | 38.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.10% | ÷1.013 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.88% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.01% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.79% |
| Singles /BIP | 36.21% | ÷1.006 | ×0.920 | ×1.004 | — | 33.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.72% | ÷1.056 | ×0.830 | ×1.004 | — | 1.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.054 | ×0.910 | ×1.004 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.923 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 101, 2B 111, 3B 111, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.
Result: wOBA .279 → .221; ISO .012 → .008; BABIP .373 → .340. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).