Jefrey Ramos
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 20 | A+Florida Fire … | 498 | .241/.294/.352 | 9 | 1 | 45 | — | .199/.241/.291 |
| 2021 | 22 | AAMississippi B… | 217 | .183/.244/.330 | 6 | 3 | 37 | — | .168/.211/.297 |
| 2022 | 23 | AAMississippi B… | 100 | .172/.273/.230 | 1 | 0 | 24 | — | .157/.242/.213 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 17 | ROK | DSL Braves | — | 138 | 126 | 29 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 230 | 287 | 333 | 620 | 103 | 280 | 20 | 7 | 277 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK | Danville Braves | — | 209 | 189 | 58 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 42 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 307 | 358 | 497 | 855 | 190 | 352 | 20 | 5 | 368 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | A | Rome Braves | — | 503 | 469 | 115 | 24 | 6 | 16 | 27 | 89 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 245 | 292 | 424 | 716 | 179 | 270 | 18 | 5 | 314 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | A+ | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 498 | 460 | 111 | 16 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 99 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 241 | 294 | 352 | 646 | 111 | 287 | 20 | 6 | 289 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 217 | 197 | 36 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 65 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 183 | 244 | 330 | 574 | 147 | 231 | 30 | 6 | 253 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 100 | 87 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 172 | 273 | 230 | 503 | 57 | 212 | 20 | 8 | 240 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 138 | 129 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 191 | 202 | 393 | 54 | 185 | 24 | 4 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 209 | 193 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 60 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 228 | 270 | 363 | 632 | 135 | 282 | 29 | 3 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 503 | 478 | 103 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 18 | 125 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 215 | 250 | 374 | 624 | 159 | 254 | 25 | 4 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | A+ MLE | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 498 | 468 | 93 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 22 | 135 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 199 | 241 | 291 | 531 | 92 | 255 | 27 | 4 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 217 | 202 | 34 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 79 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 168 | 211 | 297 | 508 | 129 | 229 | 36 | 4 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 100 | 89 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 157 | 242 | 213 | 456 | 56 | 198 | 24 | 6 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 138 | 129 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 191 | 202 | 393 | 54 | 194 | 24 | 4 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Braves | — | 138 | 126 | 29 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 230 | 287 | 333 | 620 | 103 | 280 | 20 | 7 | 277 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 209 | 193 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 60 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 228 | 270 | 363 | 632 | 135 | 293 | 29 | 3 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK RAW | Danville Braves | — | 209 | 189 | 58 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 42 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 307 | 358 | 497 | 855 | 190 | 352 | 20 | 5 | 368 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 503 | 478 | 103 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 18 | 125 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 215 | 250 | 374 | 624 | 159 | 258 | 25 | 4 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | A RAW | Rome Braves | — | 503 | 469 | 115 | 24 | 6 | 16 | 27 | 89 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 245 | 292 | 424 | 716 | 179 | 270 | 18 | 5 | 314 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | A+ MLE | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 498 | 468 | 93 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 22 | 135 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 199 | 241 | 291 | 531 | 92 | 258 | 27 | 4 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | A+ RAW | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 498 | 460 | 111 | 16 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 99 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 241 | 294 | 352 | 646 | 111 | 287 | 20 | 6 | 289 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 217 | 202 | 34 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 79 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 168 | 211 | 297 | 508 | 129 | 238 | 36 | 4 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | AA RAW | Mississippi Braves | — | 217 | 197 | 36 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 65 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 183 | 244 | 330 | 574 | 147 | 231 | 30 | 6 | 253 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 100 | 89 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 157 | 242 | 213 | 456 | 56 | 203 | 24 | 6 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | Mississippi Braves | — | 100 | 87 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 172 | 273 | 230 | 503 | 57 | 212 | 20 | 8 | 240 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | — | 138 | 130 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 146 | 191 | 200 | 391 | 54 | 185 | 24 | 4 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 209 | 196 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 60 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 224 | 270 | 357 | 627 | 133 | 282 | 29 | 3 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 503 | 476 | 103 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 18 | 125 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 216 | 250 | 376 | 626 | 160 | 254 | 25 | 4 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | A+ MLE | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 498 | 469 | 93 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 22 | 135 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 198 | 241 | 290 | 531 | 92 | 255 | 27 | 4 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 217 | 204 | 34 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 79 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 167 | 211 | 294 | 505 | 127 | 229 | 36 | 4 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 100 | 90 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 156 | 242 | 211 | 454 | 56 | 198 | 24 | 6 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1665 | 1559 | 307 | 53 | 14 | 34 | 68 | 456 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 197 | 239 | 314 | 554 | 117 | 251 | 27 | 4 | 241 | 49 | -101 | +0 | +0 | -18 | +36 | -8.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 609 | 119 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 27 | 178 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 195 | 238 | 310 | 548 | 115 | 249 | 27 | 4 | 241 | 49 | -39 | +0 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AAMississippi Braves · 100 PAwOBA .235 → .203 (−32)K% 20.0% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.00% | ÷0.985 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 5.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 3.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.91% | ÷1.020 | ×0.920 | ×1.014 | ×1.027 | 16.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.99% | ÷1.032 | ×0.910 | ×1.014 | ×1.027 | 2.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.880 | ×1.014 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.49% | ÷0.927 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 1.32% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 104, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 100, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.
Result: wOBA .235 → .203; ISO .057 → .051; BABIP .212 → .198. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAMississippi Braves · 217 PAwOBA .251 → .223 (−28)K% 30.0% → 36.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.95% | ÷0.998 | ×1.220 | — | — | 36.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.45% | ÷1.106 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.042 | 4.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.92% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.042 | 0.82% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.67% | ÷1.023 | ×0.940 | ×1.037 | ×1.042 | 16.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.79% | ÷0.999 | ×0.870 | ×1.037 | ×1.042 | 3.56% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.27% | ÷0.900 | ×0.920 | ×1.037 | ×1.042 | 2.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.55% | ÷0.861 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.042 | 4.29% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 105, 2B 100, 3B 80, K 100, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.037.
Result: wOBA .251 → .223; ISO .147 → .138; BABIP .231 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Florida Fire Frogs · 498 PAwOBA .283 → .235 (−48)K% 19.9% → 27.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.88% | ÷1.036 | ×1.420 | — | — | 27.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.02% | ÷1.057 | ×0.750 | — | ×1.042 | 4.45% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.80% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×1.042 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.71% | ÷1.005 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 20.58% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.43% | ÷1.115 | ×0.960 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 3.78% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.11% | ÷1.033 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 0.86% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.49% | ÷0.920 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.042 | 2.49% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 101, 2B 123, 3B 107, K 107, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .283 → .235; ISO .111 → .095; BABIP .287 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ARome Braves · 503 PAwOBA .306 → .264 (−42)K% 17.7% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.69% | ÷0.952 | ×1.340 | — | — | 24.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.17% | ÷0.995 | ×0.660 | — | ×1.045 | 3.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.80% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.045 | 0.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.16% | ÷0.983 | ×0.920 | ×0.999 | ×1.045 | 17.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.32% | ÷1.031 | ×0.820 | ×0.999 | ×1.045 | 5.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.58% | ÷0.990 | ×0.940 | ×0.999 | ×1.045 | 1.57% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.21% | ÷0.880 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.045 | 4.10% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 97, 2B 106, 3B 98, K 90, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .306 → .264; ISO .179 → .157; BABIP .270 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKDanville Braves · 209 PAwOBA .367 → .276 (−91)K% 20.1% → 28.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.10% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 28.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×1.022 | 3.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.91% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×1.022 | 1.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.976 | ×1.022 | 21.11% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.84% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.976 | ×1.022 | 6.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.68% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.976 | ×1.022 | 0.50% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.022 | 3.90% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .367 → .276; ISO .190 → .142; BABIP .352 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 DSLDSL Braves · 138 PAwOBA .273 → .178 (−95)K% 19.6% → 23.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 4.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.72% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 0.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.990 | ×1.022 | 13.21% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×1.022 | 4.91% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.01% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×1.022 | 0.61% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.01% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.022 | 0.49% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .273 → .178; ISO .103 → .059; BABIP .280 → .185. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).