Gabriel Maciel

PosCF

B/TS/R

Born1999-01-10

Age (2027)28

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

A+LAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	20	A+/A2 orgs	416	.283/.367/.366	3	22	73	—	.239/.309/.303
2021	22	A+MIN	265	.238/.314/.311	2	17	39	—	.198/.253/.263
2022	23	A+OAK	242	.275/.357/.370	1	7	70	—	.243/.307/.326

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2016	17	ROK	Missoula Osprey	—	254	228	64	5	0	0	17	41	2	22	5	281	336	303	639	22	339	16	7	288	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	18	ROK	Missoula Osprey	—	245	217	70	14	1	3	24	34	1	9	8	323	393	438	830	115	368	14	10	369	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	19	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	439	397	111	14	2	3	35	71	5	16	10	280	346	348	693	68	333	16	8	316	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	229	199	52	6	2	3	21	30	5	14	7	261	347	357	703	95	290	13	9	317	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	187	162	50	3	4	0	23	31	0	8	2	309	392	377	769	68	382	17	12	349	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	22	A+	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	265	235	56	7	2	2	25	50	1	17	3	238	314	311	625	72	290	19	9	284	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	23	A+	Lansing Lugnuts	—	242	211	58	11	3	1	23	34	4	7	2	275	357	370	727	95	324	14	10	326	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2016	17	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	254	234	55	4	0	0	11	59	2	22	5	235	275	252	527	17	300	23	4	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	18	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	245	226	59	11	1	2	15	49	1	9	8	261	310	345	655	84	314	20	6	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	19	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	439	408	104	12	2	2	24	98	5	16	10	255	304	309	613	54	325	22	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	229	204	47	6	2	2	16	45	5	14	7	230	302	309	611	78	273	20	7	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	187	169	42	2	3	0	17	44	0	8	2	249	317	296	613	47	338	24	9	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	22	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	265	243	48	6	2	2	17	68	1	17	3	198	253	263	516	66	251	26	6	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	23	A+ MLE	Lansing Lugnuts	—	242	218	53	9	3	1	16	43	4	7	2	243	307	326	632	83	289	18	7	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	17	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	254	234	55	4	0	0	11	59	2	22	5	235	275	252	527	17	311	23	4	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	17	ROK RAW	Missoula Osprey	—	254	228	64	5	0	0	17	41	2	22	5	281	336	303	639	22	339	16	7	288	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	18	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	245	226	59	11	1	2	15	49	1	9	8	261	310	345	655	84	322	20	6	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	18	ROK RAW	Missoula Osprey	—	245	217	70	14	1	3	24	34	1	9	8	323	393	438	830	115	368	14	10	369	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	19	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	439	408	104	12	2	2	24	98	5	16	10	255	304	309	613	54	330	22	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	19	A RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	439	397	111	14	2	3	35	71	5	16	10	280	346	348	693	68	333	16	8	316	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	416	373	89	8	5	2	33	89	5	22	9	239	309	303	612	64	305	21	8	275	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	416	361	102	9	6	3	44	61	5	22	9	283	367	366	733	83	330	15	11	331	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	22	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	265	243	48	6	2	2	17	68	1	17	3	198	253	263	516	66	261	26	6	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	22	A+ RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	265	235	56	7	2	2	25	50	1	17	3	238	314	311	625	72	290	19	9	284	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	23	A+ MLE	Lansing Lugnuts	—	242	218	53	9	3	1	16	43	4	7	2	243	307	326	632	83	299	18	7	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	23	A+ RAW	Lansing Lugnuts	—	242	211	58	11	3	1	23	34	4	7	2	275	357	370	727	95	324	14	10	326	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	17	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	254	239	55	4	0	0	11	59	2	22	5	230	275	247	522	17	300	23	4	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	18	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	245	227	59	11	1	2	15	49	1	9	8	260	310	344	654	84	314	20	6	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	19	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	439	407	104	12	2	2	24	98	5	16	10	256	304	310	614	54	325	22	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	20	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	416	375	89	8	5	2	33	89	5	22	9	237	309	301	610	64	302	21	8	275	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	22	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	265	245	48	6	2	2	17	68	1	17	3	196	253	261	514	65	251	26	6	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	23	A+ MLE	Lansing Lugnuts	—	242	220	53	9	3	1	16	43	4	7	2	241	307	323	629	82	289	18	7	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1861	1702	408	50	13	9	116	406	18	93	37	240	295	300	595	61	307	22	6	262	64	-81	+4	+0	+7	+40	-3.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	594	142	17	5	3	41	142	6	32	13	239	295	300	595	61	307	22	6	262	64	-28	+1	+0	+2	+14	-1.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 242 PAwOBA .318 → .272 (−47)K% 14.0% → 17.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.05%	÷1.011	×1.270	—	—	17.66%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.50%	÷1.020	×0.710	—	×0.998	6.61%
HBP% /PA	1.65%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	1.30%
Singles /BIP	24.29%	÷0.996	×0.920	×0.990	×0.998	22.17%
Doubles /BIP	6.21%	÷0.967	×0.810	×0.990	×0.998	5.14%
Triples /BIP	1.69%	÷1.000	×0.850	×0.990	×0.998	1.42%
Home runs /BIP	0.56%	÷0.944	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.48%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 99, 2B 93, 3B 100, K 102, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .318 → .272; ISO .095 → .080; BABIP .324 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 265 PAwOBA .280 → .226 (−55)K% 18.9% → 25.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.87%	÷0.992	×1.350	—	—	25.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.43%	÷1.026	×0.710	—	×1.012	6.60%
HBP% /PA	0.38%	—	×0.810	—	×1.012	0.31%
Singles /BIP	24.32%	÷1.012	×0.910	×0.957	×1.012	21.19%
Doubles /BIP	3.78%	÷0.976	×0.830	×0.957	×1.012	3.12%
Triples /BIP	1.08%	÷0.900	×0.820	×0.957	×1.012	0.95%
Home runs /BIP	1.08%	÷0.920	×0.830	—	×1.012	0.99%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 80, K 98, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.

Result: wOBA .280 → .226; ISO .072 → .061; BABIP .290 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 229 PAwOBA .313 → .271 (−43)K% 13.1% → 19.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.10%	÷0.939	×1.420	—	—	19.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.17%	÷1.019	×0.750	—	×1.042	7.03%
HBP% /PA	2.18%	—	×0.930	—	×1.042	2.12%
Singles /BIP	24.26%	÷0.975	×0.920	×0.950	×1.042	22.67%
Doubles /BIP	3.55%	÷0.908	×0.960	×0.950	×1.042	3.72%
Triples /BIP	1.18%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.950	×1.042	1.05%
Home runs /BIP	1.78%	÷1.362	×0.880	—	×1.042	1.20%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 172, 1B 95, 2B 82, 3B 80, K 88, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .313 → .271; ISO .095 → .077; BABIP .290 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 187 PAwOBA .341 → .281 (−60)K% 16.6% → 23.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.58%	÷0.968	×1.360	—	—	23.28%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.30%	÷0.960	×0.690	—	×1.030	9.11%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.780	—	×1.030	0.00%
Singles /BIP	32.82%	÷1.007	×0.920	×0.950	×1.030	29.34%
Doubles /BIP	2.29%	÷0.976	×0.830	×0.950	×1.030	1.90%
Triples /BIP	3.05%	÷1.045	×0.910	×0.950	×1.030	2.60%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.997	×0.800	—	×1.030	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 101, 2B 95, 3B 109, K 94, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .341 → .281; ISO .068 → .055; BABIP .382 → .338. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 439 PAwOBA .309 → .270 (−39)K% 16.2% → 22.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.17%	÷0.980	×1.360	—	—	22.43%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.97%	÷1.041	×0.690	—	×1.045	5.52%
HBP% /PA	1.14%	—	×0.780	—	×1.045	0.93%
Singles /BIP	28.22%	÷0.984	×0.920	×1.020	×1.045	28.12%
Doubles /BIP	4.29%	÷1.031	×0.830	×1.020	×1.045	3.68%
Triples /BIP	0.61%	÷0.993	×0.910	×1.020	×1.045	0.60%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷1.163	×0.800	—	×1.045	0.66%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 97, 2B 106, 3B 99, K 96, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .309 → .270; ISO .068 → .054; BABIP .333 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKMissoula Osprey · 245 PAwOBA .362 → .286 (−76)K% 13.9% → 20.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.88%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	19.98%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.80%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×1.022	6.11%
HBP% /PA	0.41%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.30%
Singles /BIP	28.42%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×1.022	25.02%
Doubles /BIP	7.65%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.022	5.91%
Triples /BIP	0.55%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.022	0.42%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×1.022	1.26%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .362 → .286; ISO .115 → .088; BABIP .368 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ROKMissoula Osprey · 254 PAwOBA .283 → .232 (−51)K% 16.1% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.14%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	23.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.69%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×1.038	4.24%
HBP% /PA	0.79%	—	×0.720	—	×1.038	0.59%
Singles /BIP	31.55%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×1.038	28.18%
Doubles /BIP	2.67%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.038	2.10%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.038	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×1.038	0.00%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 19.5 → +3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .283 → .232; ISO .022 → .017; BABIP .339 → .300. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).