Griffin Benson
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 19 | ROKDanville Brav… | 157 | .234/.327/.285 | 1 | 1 | 20 | — | .168/.237/.210 |
| 2018 | 20 | A/ROK2 orgs | 145 | .256/.338/.403 | 3 | 2 | 37 | — | .171/.234/.268 |
| 2019 | 21 | ARome Braves | 437 | .208/.319/.392 | 13 | 1 | 39 | — | .146/.234/.281 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 18 | ROK | GCL Braves | — | 185 | 166 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 223 | 291 | 271 | 562 | 48 | 283 | 22 | 8 | 258 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | ROK | Danville Braves | — | 157 | 137 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 234 | 327 | 285 | 612 | 51 | 320 | 25 | 11 | 287 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A | Rome Braves | — | 29 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 310 | 280 | 590 | 80 | 357 | 38 | 10 | 280 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | ROK | Danville Braves | — | 116 | 104 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 269 | 345 | 433 | 778 | 163 | 373 | 29 | 9 | 347 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A | Rome Braves | — | 437 | 375 | 78 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 49 | 147 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 208 | 319 | 392 | 711 | 184 | 301 | 34 | 11 | 321 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 185 | 171 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 214 | 199 | 413 | 35 | 231 | 31 | 5 | 185 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 157 | 143 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 57 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 168 | 237 | 210 | 447 | 42 | 258 | 36 | 7 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 29 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 115 | 207 | 154 | 361 | 38 | 319 | 52 | 7 | 187 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 116 | 108 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 48 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 185 | 241 | 296 | 538 | 111 | 305 | 41 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 437 | 391 | 57 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 197 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 146 | 234 | 281 | 515 | 136 | 244 | 45 | 8 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 185 | 171 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 214 | 199 | 413 | 35 | 237 | 31 | 5 | 185 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Braves | — | 185 | 166 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 223 | 291 | 271 | 562 | 48 | 283 | 22 | 8 | 258 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 157 | 143 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 57 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 168 | 237 | 210 | 447 | 42 | 267 | 36 | 7 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | ROK RAW | Danville Braves | — | 157 | 137 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 234 | 327 | 285 | 612 | 51 | 320 | 25 | 11 | 287 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 145 | 134 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 64 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 172 | 234 | 269 | 503 | 97 | 309 | 44 | 6 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 145 | 129 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 45 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 256 | 338 | 403 | 741 | 147 | 370 | 31 | 9 | 334 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 437 | 391 | 57 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 197 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 146 | 234 | 281 | 515 | 136 | 250 | 45 | 8 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A RAW | Rome Braves | — | 437 | 375 | 78 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 49 | 147 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 208 | 319 | 392 | 711 | 184 | 301 | 34 | 11 | 321 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 185 | 172 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 163 | 214 | 198 | 412 | 35 | 231 | 31 | 5 | 185 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 157 | 143 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 57 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 168 | 237 | 210 | 447 | 42 | 258 | 36 | 7 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 145 | 133 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 64 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 173 | 234 | 271 | 505 | 98 | 308 | 44 | 6 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 437 | 389 | 57 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 197 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 147 | 234 | 283 | 517 | 136 | 244 | 45 | 8 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 924 | 839 | 132 | 25 | 4 | 15 | 61 | 376 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 157 | 231 | 250 | 481 | 93 | 259 | 41 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -77 | +0 | +0 | -17 | +20 | -7.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 590 | 94 | 18 | 3 | 11 | 43 | 265 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 159 | 232 | 256 | 488 | 97 | 262 | 41 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -54 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -5.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 ARome Braves · 437 PAwOBA .313 → .226 (−87)K% 33.6% → 45.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.64% | ÷1.001 | ×1.340 | — | — | 45.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.21% | ÷0.982 | ×0.660 | — | — | 7.54% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.75% | — | ×0.770 | — | — | 2.11% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.11% | ÷1.007 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 14.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.65% | ÷1.080 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | — | 6.96% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.75% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | — | 1.36% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.70% | ÷0.851 | ×0.820 | — | — | 5.50% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 101, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 100, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .313 → .226; ISO .184 → .138; BABIP .301 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKDanville Braves · 116 PAwOBA .338 → .232 (−107)K% 29.3% → 41.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.31% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 41.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.985 | 5.43% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.72% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.985 | 1.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.032 | ×0.985 | 21.96% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.032 | ×0.985 | 6.45% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.032 | ×0.985 | 1.07% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.985 | 3.38% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.
Result: wOBA .338 → .232; ISO .163 → .108; BABIP .373 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ARome Braves · 29 PAwOBA .273 → .187 (−86)K% 37.9% → 53.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 37.93% | ÷0.952 | ×1.340 | — | — | 53.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.34% | ÷0.995 | ×0.660 | — | ×1.015 | 6.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.45% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.015 | 2.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.43% | ÷0.983 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 20.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 14.29% | ÷1.031 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.015 | 11.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.990 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.880 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 97, 2B 106, 3B 98, K 90, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .273 → .187; ISO .080 → .049; BABIP .357 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKDanville Braves · 157 PAwOBA .282 → .198 (−83)K% 25.5% → 36.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.48% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 36.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.995 | 6.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.27% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.995 | 0.94% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.84% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.984 | ×0.995 | 22.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.984 | ×0.995 | 2.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.984 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.995 | 0.82% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.
Result: wOBA .282 → .198; ISO .051 → .035; BABIP .320 → .258. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKGCL Braves · 185 PAwOBA .255 → .185 (−70)K% 21.6% → 31.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.62% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 31.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 4.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.08% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 20.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.97% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 2.89% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.005 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.62% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.
Result: wOBA .255 → .185; ISO .048 → .034; BABIP .283 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).