Jake Slaughter

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1996-10-24

Age (2027)30

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2024

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2022	25	AA/A+2 orgs	470	.284/.384/.514	23	36	101	—	.239/.324/.414
2023	26	AAACHC	432	.243/.343/.482	22	16	78	—	.200/.280/.374
2024	27	AAASEA	498	.281/.360/.444	15	21	74	—	.231/.293/.338

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2024 AAA

Max EV81

Speed48

K%35

BB%34

Whiff%32

Chase%28

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2019	22	A	South Bend Cubs	—	121	108	30	5	1	1	8	22	2	0	0	278	339	370	709	93	330	18	7	314	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	24	19	1	1	0	0	2	11	3	0	0	53	250	105	355	53	125	46	8	204	-12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+	South Bend Cubs	—	375	341	86	11	3	3	21	101	10	16	7	252	315	328	643	76	347	27	6	292	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	386	328	96	17	1	20	37	83	17	28	8	293	393	534	926	241	332	22	10	404	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	A+	South Bend Cubs	—	84	73	18	4	0	3	10	22	1	8	0	247	345	425	770	178	312	26	12	346	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	432	371	90	21	1	22	46	119	11	16	6	243	343	482	826	240	291	28	11	361	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	27	AAA	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	441	124	27	0	15	44	130	10	21	8	281	360	444	804	163	365	26	9	358	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2019	22	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	121	111	25	4	1	1	5	31	2	0	0	225	271	306	577	81	280	26	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	24	20	1	1	0	0	1	14	3	0	0	50	208	100	308	50	107	58	4	150	-12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	375	347	70	8	2	2	15	135	10	16	7	202	255	254	509	52	311	36	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	386	338	85	16	1	15	27	106	17	28	8	251	338	438	776	186	305	27	7	332	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	A+ MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	84	76	14	3	0	2	7	28	1	8	0	184	262	303	565	118	250	33	8	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	432	385	77	17	1	16	32	140	11	16	6	200	280	374	654	174	254	32	7	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	27	AAA MLE	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	455	105	22	0	9	30	155	10	21	8	231	293	338	631	108	323	31	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	121	111	25	4	1	1	5	31	2	0	0	225	271	306	577	81	293	26	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A RAW	South Bend Cubs	—	121	108	30	5	1	1	8	22	2	0	0	278	339	370	709	93	330	18	7	314	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	399	367	70	8	2	2	16	148	13	16	7	191	250	240	490	49	311	37	4	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	399	360	87	12	3	3	23	112	13	16	7	242	311	317	627	75	340	28	6	287	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	470	414	99	19	1	18	34	134	18	36	8	239	324	420	744	181	305	29	7	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	470	401	114	21	1	23	47	105	18	36	8	284	384	514	898	229	329	22	10	393	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	432	385	77	17	1	16	32	140	11	16	6	200	280	374	654	174	262	32	7	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	AAA RAW	Iowa Cubs	—	432	371	90	21	1	22	46	119	11	16	6	243	343	482	826	240	291	28	11	361	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	27	AAA MLE	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	455	105	22	0	9	30	155	10	21	8	231	293	338	631	108	327	31	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	27	AAA RAW	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	441	124	27	0	15	44	130	10	21	8	281	360	444	804	163	365	26	9	358	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	121	113	25	4	1	1	5	31	2	0	0	221	271	301	572	80	280	26	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	399	367	70	8	2	2	16	148	13	16	7	191	250	240	490	49	299	37	4	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	470	415	99	19	1	18	34	134	18	36	8	239	324	419	743	181	295	29	7	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	432	386	77	17	1	16	32	140	11	16	6	199	280	373	653	174	254	32	7	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	27	AAA MLE	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	455	105	22	0	9	30	155	10	21	8	231	293	338	631	108	323	31	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
2024	27	AAA MLE	Tacoma Rainiers	—	498	455	105	22	0	9	30	155	10	21	8	231	293	338	631	108	323	31	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1920	1732	376	70	5	46	117	608	54	89	29	217	287	343	630	126	302	32	6	275	72	-63	+6	+0	+21	+42	0.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	586	128	24	2	16	40	206	18	30	10	218	288	348	636	130	304	32	6	275	72	-21	+2	+0	+7	+14	0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AAATacoma Rainiers · 498 PAwOBA .350 → .278 (−72)K% 26.1% → 31.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.10%	÷1.004	×1.200	—	—	31.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.84%	÷1.011	×0.690	—	×0.992	5.98%
HBP% /PA	2.01%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	1.87%
Singles /BIP	26.37%	÷1.010	×0.930	×1.018	×0.992	24.51%
Doubles /BIP	8.68%	÷1.014	×0.830	×1.018	×0.992	7.17%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.970	×1.018	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.82%	÷1.142	×0.700	—	×0.992	2.93%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 102, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 101, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .350 → .278; ISO .163 → .110; BABIP .365 → .323. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAAIowa Cubs · 432 PAwOBA .355 → .283 (−72)K% 27.5% → 32.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.55%	÷1.019	×1.200	—	—	32.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.65%	÷1.014	×0.690	—	×1.003	7.27%
HBP% /PA	2.55%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	2.40%
Singles /BIP	18.25%	÷1.025	×0.930	×1.023	×1.003	17.00%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷1.049	×0.830	×1.023	×1.003	6.77%
Triples /BIP	0.40%	÷0.916	×0.970	×1.023	×1.003	0.43%
Home runs /BIP	8.73%	÷0.965	×0.700	—	×1.003	6.35%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 105, 2B 110, 3B 83, K 104, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .355 → .283; ISO .240 → .180; BABIP .291 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AATennessee Smokies · 386 PAwOBA .397 → .332 (−65)K% 21.5% → 27.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.50%	÷0.958	×1.220	—	—	27.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.59%	÷0.940	×0.680	—	×0.988	6.85%
HBP% /PA	4.40%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	3.66%
Singles /BIP	23.67%	÷0.982	×0.920	×1.003	×0.988	21.99%
Doubles /BIP	6.94%	÷0.929	×0.910	×1.003	×0.988	6.74%
Triples /BIP	0.41%	÷0.973	×0.880	×1.003	×0.988	0.37%
Home runs /BIP	8.16%	÷1.010	×0.800	—	×0.988	6.39%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 96, 2B 86, 3B 95, K 92, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.003.

Result: wOBA .397 → .332; ISO .241 → .195; BABIP .332 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+South Bend Cubs · 84 PAwOBA .337 → .253 (−84)K% 26.2% → 33.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.19%	÷1.003	×1.270	—	—	33.18%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.90%	÷0.986	×0.710	—	×0.968	8.30%
HBP% /PA	1.19%	—	×0.790	—	×0.968	0.91%
Singles /BIP	21.57%	÷1.010	×0.920	×0.950	×0.968	18.06%
Doubles /BIP	7.84%	÷1.020	×0.810	×0.950	×0.968	5.73%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.097	×0.850	×0.950	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.88%	÷0.938	×0.800	—	×0.968	4.86%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 102, 2B 104, 3B 119, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .337 → .253; ISO .178 → .135; BABIP .312 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+South Bend Cubs · 375 PAwOBA .286 → .226 (−60)K% 26.9% → 35.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.93%	÷1.012	×1.350	—	—	35.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.60%	÷0.968	×0.710	—	×0.978	4.02%
HBP% /PA	2.67%	—	×0.810	—	×0.978	2.11%
Singles /BIP	28.75%	÷0.990	×0.910	×1.031	×0.978	26.64%
Doubles /BIP	4.58%	÷1.080	×0.830	×1.031	×0.978	3.55%
Triples /BIP	1.25%	÷1.150	×0.820	×1.031	×0.978	0.90%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷0.928	×0.830	—	×0.978	1.09%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 98, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 102, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .286 → .226; ISO .076 → .055; BABIP .347 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AATennessee Smokies · 24 PAwOBA .200 → .150 (−49)K% 45.8% → 56.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	45.83%	÷0.990	×1.220	—	—	56.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.33%	÷1.066	×0.690	—	×0.998	5.38%
HBP% /PA	12.50%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	10.60%
Singles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.970	×0.940	—	×0.998	0.00%
Doubles /BIP	12.50%	÷1.015	×0.870	—	×0.998	10.70%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.050	×0.780	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 94, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 98, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .200 → .150; ISO .053 → .037; BABIP .125 → .107. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ASouth Bend Cubs · 121 PAwOBA .314 → .249 (−64)K% 18.2% → 25.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.18%	÷0.968	×1.360	—	—	25.55%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.61%	÷0.994	×0.690	—	×0.990	4.54%
HBP% /PA	1.65%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	1.28%
Singles /BIP	26.74%	÷0.987	×0.920	×0.950	×0.990	23.44%
Doubles /BIP	5.81%	÷1.026	×0.830	×0.950	×0.990	4.42%
Triples /BIP	1.16%	÷1.150	×0.910	×0.950	×0.990	0.87%
Home runs /BIP	1.16%	÷0.914	×0.800	—	×0.990	1.01%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 97, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 94, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .314 → .249; ISO .093 → .071; BABIP .330 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).