Luis Pintor
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 21 | ROKGCL Marlins | 130 | .255/.344/.300 | 0 | 6 | 33 | — | .200/.264/.235 |
| 2017 | 22 | APIT | 453 | .236/.328/.313 | 4 | 9 | 48 | — | .210/.280/.270 |
| 2018 | 23 | AA/A+MIA | 191 | .147/.253/.184 | 0 | 0 | 6 | — | .126/.209/.162 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 21 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 130 | 110 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 255 | 344 | 300 | 644 | 45 | 298 | 15 | 9 | 291 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 453 | 386 | 91 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 43 | 64 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 236 | 328 | 313 | 641 | 78 | 270 | 14 | 9 | 289 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 46 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 136 | 75 | 211 | 25 | 77 | 30 | 9 | 108 | -56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 145 | 123 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 27 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 179 | 289 | 220 | 508 | 41 | 227 | 19 | 9 | 243 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 130 | 115 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 27 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 200 | 264 | 235 | 499 | 35 | 232 | 21 | 5 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 453 | 400 | 84 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 85 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 210 | 280 | 270 | 550 | 60 | 242 | 19 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA MLE | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 46 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 91 | 71 | 162 | 24 | 76 | 35 | 4 | 86 | -56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 145 | 126 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 38 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 151 | 246 | 190 | 437 | 40 | 208 | 26 | 7 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 130 | 115 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 27 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 200 | 264 | 235 | 499 | 35 | 253 | 21 | 5 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | ROK RAW | GCL Marlins | — | 130 | 110 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 255 | 344 | 300 | 644 | 45 | 298 | 15 | 9 | 291 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 453 | 400 | 84 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 85 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 210 | 280 | 270 | 550 | 60 | 256 | 19 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A RAW | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 453 | 386 | 91 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 43 | 64 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 236 | 328 | 313 | 641 | 78 | 270 | 14 | 9 | 289 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 191 | 168 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 54 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 125 | 210 | 161 | 370 | 36 | 183 | 28 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 191 | 163 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 41 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 147 | 253 | 184 | 437 | 37 | 195 | 21 | 9 | 211 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 130 | 119 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 27 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 193 | 264 | 227 | 491 | 34 | 232 | 21 | 5 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 453 | 411 | 84 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 85 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 204 | 280 | 263 | 543 | 58 | 242 | 19 | 6 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 191 | 171 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 54 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 123 | 210 | 158 | 368 | 35 | 176 | 28 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 774 | 683 | 128 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 48 | 166 | 19 | 15 | 6 | 187 | 260 | 237 | 497 | 50 | 239 | 21 | 6 | 220 | 35 | -60 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +17 | -4.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 574 | 109 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 139 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 190 | 262 | 244 | 506 | 54 | 241 | 21 | 6 | 220 | 35 | -50 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2018 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 145 PAwOBA .239 → .206 (−33)K% 18.6% → 26.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.62% | ÷1.009 | ×1.420 | — | — | 26.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.97% | ÷0.967 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.998 | 6.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.14% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.998 | 3.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.71% | ÷1.018 | ×0.920 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 15.64% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.21% | ÷0.903 | ×0.960 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 5.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.850 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 104, 2B 80, 3B 130, K 102, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .239 → .206; ISO .041 → .040; BABIP .227 → .208. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 46 PAwOBA .106 → .086 (−20)K% 30.4% → 35.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.43% | ÷1.052 | ×1.220 | — | — | 35.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.70% | ÷1.122 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 5.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷1.050 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.027 | 3.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷0.875 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.027 | 4.11% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.041 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 110, 2B 75, 3B 80, K 110, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .106 → .086; ISO .025 → .028; BABIP .077 → .076. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 453 PAwOBA .285 → .239 (−46)K% 14.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.13% | ÷1.013 | ×1.340 | — | — | 18.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.49% | ÷0.991 | ×0.660 | — | — | 6.32% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.21% | — | ×0.770 | — | — | 1.70% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.05% | ÷0.994 | ×0.920 | ×0.999 | — | 20.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.35% | ÷1.066 | ×0.820 | ×0.999 | — | 3.34% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.62% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×0.999 | — | 0.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.24% | ÷1.168 | ×0.820 | — | — | 0.87% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 134, 1B 99, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 103, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .285 → .239; ISO .078 → .060; BABIP .270 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKGCL Marlins · 130 PAwOBA .291 → .217 (−74)K% 14.6% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.62% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 21.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 5.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.31% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.984 | ×0.985 | 20.08% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.984 | ×0.985 | 3.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.984 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.
Result: wOBA .291 → .217; ISO .045 → .032; BABIP .298 → .232. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).