Cole Freeman
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 24 | A+/INTL2 orgs | 584 | .304/.389/.391 | 3 | 32 | 78 | — | .266/.327/.342 |
| 2021 | 26 | AAWSH | 440 | .267/.328/.340 | 5 | 15 | 61 | — | .241/.293/.298 |
| 2022 | 27 | AAAWSH | 162 | .243/.301/.347 | 2 | 15 | 57 | — | .224/.269/.306 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A | Hagerstown Suns | — | 522 | 447 | 119 | 32 | 3 | 3 | 47 | 59 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 266 | 357 | 371 | 728 | 105 | 298 | 11 | 9 | 326 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ | Potomac Nationals | — | 534 | 453 | 141 | 27 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 60 | 11 | 31 | 6 | 311 | 397 | 404 | 800 | 93 | 351 | 11 | 10 | 353 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | INTL | Surprise Saguaros | — | 50 | 43 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 233 | 312 | 256 | 568 | 23 | 286 | 18 | 6 | 260 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA | Harrisburg Senators | — | 440 | 397 | 106 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 47 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 267 | 328 | 340 | 668 | 73 | 290 | 11 | 5 | 302 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA | Rochester Red Wings | — | 162 | 144 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 243 | 301 | 347 | 649 | 104 | 268 | 12 | 6 | 283 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Hagerstown Suns | — | 522 | 464 | 103 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 80 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 222 | 292 | 302 | 594 | 80 | 253 | 15 | 6 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Potomac Nationals | — | 534 | 474 | 126 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 87 | 11 | 31 | 6 | 266 | 327 | 342 | 669 | 76 | 302 | 16 | 6 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 440 | 403 | 97 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 59 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 241 | 293 | 298 | 591 | 57 | 264 | 13 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA MLE | Rochester Red Wings | — | 162 | 147 | 33 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 224 | 269 | 306 | 575 | 82 | 248 | 14 | 4 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Hagerstown Suns | — | 522 | 464 | 103 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 80 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 222 | 292 | 302 | 594 | 80 | 262 | 15 | 6 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A RAW | Hagerstown Suns | — | 522 | 447 | 119 | 32 | 3 | 3 | 47 | 59 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 266 | 357 | 371 | 728 | 105 | 298 | 11 | 9 | 326 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 584 | 518 | 137 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 34 | 95 | 13 | 32 | 9 | 264 | 326 | 338 | 664 | 73 | 316 | 16 | 6 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 584 | 496 | 151 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 56 | 69 | 13 | 32 | 9 | 304 | 389 | 391 | 781 | 87 | 346 | 12 | 10 | 345 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 440 | 403 | 97 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 59 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 241 | 293 | 298 | 591 | 57 | 271 | 13 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA RAW | Harrisburg Senators | — | 440 | 397 | 106 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 47 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 267 | 328 | 340 | 668 | 73 | 290 | 11 | 5 | 302 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA MLE | Rochester Red Wings | — | 162 | 147 | 33 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 224 | 269 | 306 | 575 | 82 | 258 | 14 | 4 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA RAW | Rochester Red Wings | — | 162 | 144 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 243 | 301 | 347 | 649 | 104 | 268 | 12 | 6 | 283 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Hagerstown Suns | — | 522 | 471 | 103 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 80 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 219 | 292 | 297 | 589 | 79 | 253 | 15 | 6 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 584 | 532 | 137 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 34 | 95 | 13 | 32 | 9 | 258 | 326 | 329 | 655 | 71 | 302 | 16 | 6 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 440 | 407 | 97 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 59 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 238 | 293 | 295 | 588 | 57 | 264 | 13 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA MLE | Rochester Red Wings | — | 162 | 152 | 33 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 217 | 269 | 296 | 565 | 79 | 248 | 14 | 4 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1708 | 1532 | 370 | 70 | 5 | 10 | 86 | 257 | 46 | 88 | 25 | 242 | 302 | 313 | 615 | 72 | 282 | 15 | 5 | 268 | 68 | -66 | +8 | +0 | +6 | +37 | -1.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 583 | 141 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 98 | 18 | 33 | 10 | 242 | 303 | 316 | 619 | 74 | 282 | 15 | 5 | 268 | 68 | -25 | +3 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AAARochester Red Wings · 162 PAwOBA .277 → .252 (−25)K% 12.3% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.35% | ÷1.049 | ×1.200 | — | — | 14.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.56% | ÷0.973 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.992 | 3.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.85% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×0.992 | 1.73% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.16% | ÷1.011 | ×0.930 | ×1.020 | ×0.992 | 18.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.65% | ÷0.930 | ×0.830 | ×1.020 | ×0.992 | 5.10% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.81% | ÷0.913 | ×0.970 | ×1.020 | ×0.992 | 0.87% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.61% | ÷1.084 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.992 | 1.03% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 102, 2B 86, 3B 83, K 110, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.
Result: wOBA .277 → .252; ISO .104 → .090; BABIP .268 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAHarrisburg Senators · 440 PAwOBA .296 → .258 (−37)K% 10.7% → 13.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.68% | ÷0.980 | ×1.220 | — | — | 13.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.00% | ÷0.948 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.978 | 3.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.18% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.978 | 2.65% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.86% | ÷0.967 | ×0.940 | ×0.982 | ×0.978 | 23.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.055 | ×0.870 | ×0.982 | ×0.978 | 3.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.920 | ×0.982 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.037 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.978 | 1.05% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 93, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 96, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.
Result: wOBA .296 → .258; ISO .073 → .056; BABIP .290 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Potomac Nationals · 534 PAwOBA .346 → .287 (−59)K% 11.2% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.24% | ÷0.983 | ×1.420 | — | — | 16.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.74% | ÷1.023 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.978 | 5.86% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.06% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.978 | 1.73% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | ×0.978 | 23.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.87% | ÷0.928 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.978 | 5.71% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.76% | ÷1.079 | ×0.800 | ×0.950 | ×0.978 | 0.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.76% | ÷0.988 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.978 | 0.68% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 100, 2B 86, 3B 116, K 97, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .346 → .287; ISO .093 → .079; BABIP .351 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AHagerstown Suns · 522 PAwOBA .319 → .261 (−58)K% 11.3% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.30% | ÷0.992 | ×1.340 | — | — | 15.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.81% | ÷0.983 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.980 | 5.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.07% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.980 | 2.31% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.88% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×0.968 | ×0.980 | 17.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.25% | ÷0.941 | ×0.820 | ×0.968 | ×0.980 | 6.82% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.77% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×0.968 | ×0.980 | 0.60% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.77% | ÷1.108 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 0.56% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 122, 1B 103, 2B 88, 3B 130, K 98, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.
Result: wOBA .319 → .261; ISO .105 → .087; BABIP .298 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .