Mitch Longo
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 24 | AACLE | 366 | .248/.320/.370 | 5 | 11 | 64 | — | .220/.275/.332 |
| 2021 | 26 | AAA/AAMIL | 352 | .286/.350/.481 | 12 | 22 | 83 | — | .239/.287/.392 |
| 2022 | 27 | AAWSH | 140 | .221/.271/.382 | 5 | 1 | 40 | — | .188/.229/.316 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | A+ | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 562 | 650 | 688 | 1.337 | 125 | 643 | 10 | 20 | 585 | 228 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A | Lake County Captains | — | 232 | 202 | 73 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 23 | 35 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 361 | 437 | 530 | 966 | 168 | 416 | 15 | 10 | 422 | 132 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 512 | 461 | 127 | 28 | 5 | 8 | 41 | 97 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 275 | 340 | 410 | 750 | 134 | 331 | 19 | 8 | 332 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA | Akron RubberDucks | — | 366 | 327 | 81 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 73 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 248 | 320 | 370 | 690 | 122 | 304 | 20 | 8 | 309 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AAA | Nashville Sounds | — | 59 | 55 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 182 | 237 | 291 | 528 | 109 | 273 | 36 | 7 | 239 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA | Biloxi Shuckers | — | 293 | 263 | 81 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 23 | 56 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 308 | 372 | 521 | 893 | 213 | 354 | 19 | 8 | 388 | 97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA | Harrisburg Senators | — | 140 | 131 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 221 | 271 | 382 | 653 | 160 | 258 | 24 | 6 | 291 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 20 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 529 | 600 | 647 | 1.247 | 118 | 597 | 15 | 15 | 505 | 228 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 232 | 209 | 68 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 48 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 325 | 384 | 455 | 839 | 129 | 395 | 21 | 7 | 364 | 132 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 512 | 477 | 104 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 132 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 218 | 263 | 319 | 582 | 101 | 278 | 26 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 366 | 337 | 74 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 89 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 220 | 275 | 332 | 608 | 113 | 280 | 24 | 6 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AAA MLE | Nashville Sounds | — | 59 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 161 | 203 | 268 | 471 | 107 | 256 | 42 | 5 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Biloxi Shuckers | — | 293 | 271 | 69 | 11 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 70 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 255 | 303 | 417 | 720 | 162 | 306 | 24 | 5 | 311 | 97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 140 | 133 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 188 | 229 | 316 | 544 | 128 | 229 | 29 | 4 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 252 | 226 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 51 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 341 | 402 | 469 | 871 | 128 | 423 | 20 | 8 | 375 | 140 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 252 | 218 | 82 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 37 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 376 | 454 | 541 | 995 | 165 | 433 | 15 | 11 | 435 | 140 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 512 | 477 | 104 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 132 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 218 | 263 | 319 | 582 | 101 | 284 | 26 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 512 | 461 | 127 | 28 | 5 | 8 | 41 | 97 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 275 | 340 | 410 | 750 | 134 | 331 | 19 | 8 | 332 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 366 | 337 | 74 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 89 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 220 | 275 | 332 | 608 | 113 | 283 | 24 | 6 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | — | 366 | 327 | 81 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 73 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 248 | 320 | 370 | 690 | 122 | 304 | 20 | 8 | 309 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 352 | 327 | 78 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 94 | 4 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 287 | 391 | 678 | 153 | 302 | 27 | 5 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 352 | 318 | 91 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 27 | 77 | 4 | 22 | 2 | 286 | 350 | 481 | 831 | 195 | 342 | 22 | 8 | 363 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 140 | 133 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 188 | 229 | 316 | 544 | 128 | 236 | 29 | 4 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA RAW | Harrisburg Senators | — | 140 | 131 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 221 | 271 | 382 | 653 | 160 | 258 | 24 | 6 | 291 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 252 | 227 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 51 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 339 | 402 | 467 | 869 | 128 | 411 | 20 | 8 | 375 | 140 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 512 | 478 | 104 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 132 | 4 | 18 | 8 | 218 | 263 | 318 | 581 | 100 | 278 | 26 | 5 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 366 | 337 | 74 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 89 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 220 | 275 | 332 | 608 | 113 | 280 | 24 | 6 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 352 | 327 | 78 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 94 | 4 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 287 | 391 | 678 | 153 | 298 | 27 | 5 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | Harrisburg Senators | — | 140 | 132 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 189 | 229 | 318 | 547 | 129 | 229 | 29 | 4 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1622 | 1500 | 358 | 69 | 13 | 29 | 89 | 406 | 18 | 72 | 16 | 239 | 289 | 360 | 649 | 121 | 306 | 25 | 5 | 281 | 76 | -46 | +8 | +0 | -17 | +35 | -2.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 601 | 144 | 28 | 5 | 12 | 36 | 163 | 7 | 29 | 6 | 240 | 290 | 363 | 653 | 123 | 307 | 25 | 6 | 281 | 76 | -18 | +3 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AAHarrisburg Senators · 140 PAwOBA .283 → .227 (−56)K% 23.6% → 28.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.57% | ÷0.996 | ×1.220 | — | — | 28.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.71% | ÷0.980 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.978 | 3.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.71% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.978 | 0.59% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.37% | ÷1.016 | ×0.970 | ×0.973 | ×0.978 | 16.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.12% | ÷0.936 | ×0.860 | ×0.973 | ×0.978 | 5.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.950 | ×0.973 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.10% | ÷0.979 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.978 | 3.97% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 103, 2B 87, 3B 130, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .283 → .227; ISO .160 → .123; BABIP .258 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AABiloxi Shuckers · 293 PAwOBA .380 → .311 (−69)K% 19.1% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.11% | ÷0.980 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.85% | ÷1.033 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.988 | 5.18% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.37% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 1.15% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.64% | ÷0.993 | ×0.940 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 22.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.25% | ÷1.124 | ×0.870 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 5.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 1.71% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.31% | ÷0.929 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.988 | 4.41% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 99, 2B 125, 3B 100, K 96, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .380 → .311; ISO .213 → .171; BABIP .354 → .306. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAANashville Sounds · 59 PAwOBA .233 → .190 (−43)K% 35.6% → 41.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.59% | ÷1.024 | ×1.200 | — | — | 41.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.78% | ÷0.946 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 5.03% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.59% | ÷0.966 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.018 | 20.17% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.94% | ÷1.030 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.018 | 2.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.94% | ÷1.150 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.018 | 2.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.94% | ÷0.915 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.018 | 2.29% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 93, 2B 106, 3B 130, K 105, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .233 → .190; ISO .109 → .080; BABIP .273 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAAkron RubberDucks · 366 PAwOBA .302 → .263 (−39)K% 19.9% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.95% | ÷1.003 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.20% | ÷1.019 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 5.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.37% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 1.18% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.65% | ÷1.008 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 20.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.69% | ÷0.925 | ×0.860 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 5.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.57% | ÷0.900 | ×0.950 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 1.60% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.97% | ÷0.863 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 1.80% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 102, 2B 85, 3B 80, K 101, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .302 → .263; ISO .122 → .112; BABIP .304 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 512 PAwOBA .326 → .255 (−71)K% 18.9% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.95% | ÷1.047 | ×1.420 | — | — | 25.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.01% | ÷1.025 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.998 | 4.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.78% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.998 | 0.67% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.63% | ÷1.044 | ×0.940 | ×0.976 | ×0.998 | 20.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.054 | ×0.830 | ×0.976 | ×0.998 | 5.90% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.37% | ÷1.150 | ×0.800 | ×0.976 | ×0.998 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.20% | ÷0.967 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.998 | 2.04% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 109, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 110, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .326 → .255; ISO .134 → .106; BABIP .331 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ALake County Captains · 232 PAwOBA .416 → .364 (−52)K% 15.1% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.09% | ÷0.993 | ×1.360 | — | — | 20.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.48% | ÷0.941 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.95% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.72% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.34% | ÷0.914 | ×0.920 | ×1.004 | — | 29.65% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.78% | ÷1.030 | ×0.830 | ×1.004 | — | 8.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.20% | ÷0.931 | ×0.910 | ×1.004 | — | 1.17% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.40% | ÷1.129 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.70% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 83, 2B 106, 3B 86, K 99, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.
Result: wOBA .416 → .364; ISO .168 → .132; BABIP .416 → .395. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 20 PAwOBA .571 → .505 (−66)K% 10.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.048 | ×1.420 | — | — | 13.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 20.00% | ÷1.008 | ×0.630 | — | ×1.012 | 12.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 50.00% | ÷0.978 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.012 | 48.64% |
| Doubles /BIP | 14.29% | ÷1.084 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.012 | 11.07% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.070 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.902 | ×0.900 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 96, 2B 117, 3B 114, K 110, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .571 → .505; ISO .125 → .102; BABIP .643 → .597. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).