Kingston Liniak
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 19 | ADET | 21 | .050/.095/.050 | 0 | 1 | -71 | — | .050/.095/.050 |
| 2021 | 21 | ADET | 456 | .193/.280/.332 | 10 | 19 | 26 | — | .149/.216/.254 |
| 2022 | 22 | A/ROKDET | 128 | .196/.328/.308 | 2 | 1 | 33 | — | .140/.234/.200 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 18 | ROK | GCL Tigers West | — | 200 | 188 | 44 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 58 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 234 | 273 | 277 | 549 | 43 | 333 | 29 | 4 | 250 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 145 | 67 | 24 | 0 | 78 | -71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2021 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 456 | 404 | 78 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 121 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 193 | 280 | 332 | 612 | 139 | 247 | 27 | 9 | 277 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 97 | 80 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 163 | 309 | 212 | 522 | 50 | 220 | 22 | 18 | 259 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 31 | 27 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 296 | 387 | 593 | 980 | 296 | 300 | 16 | 13 | 424 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers West | — | 200 | 191 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 84 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 152 | 182 | 178 | 360 | 26 | 255 | 42 | 2 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 145 | 62 | 29 | 0 | 63 | -71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 456 | 417 | 62 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 29 | 166 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 149 | 216 | 254 | 471 | 106 | 217 | 36 | 6 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 97 | 85 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 129 | 237 | 165 | 402 | 35 | 192 | 30 | 12 | 193 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 31 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172 | 226 | 310 | 536 | 138 | 224 | 23 | 6 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers West | — | 200 | 191 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 84 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 152 | 182 | 178 | 360 | 26 | 266 | 42 | 2 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Tigers West | — | 200 | 188 | 44 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 58 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 234 | 273 | 277 | 549 | 43 | 333 | 29 | 4 | 250 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 145 | 71 | 29 | 0 | 63 | -71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2019 | 19 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 145 | 67 | 24 | 0 | 78 | -71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 456 | 417 | 62 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 29 | 166 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 149 | 216 | 254 | 471 | 106 | 220 | 36 | 6 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 456 | 404 | 78 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 121 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 193 | 280 | 332 | 612 | 139 | 247 | 27 | 9 | 277 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 128 | 114 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 149 | 242 | 219 | 461 | 70 | 211 | 29 | 11 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 128 | 107 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 196 | 328 | 308 | 637 | 112 | 241 | 20 | 16 | 299 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers West | — | 200 | 191 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 84 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 152 | 182 | 178 | 360 | 26 | 255 | 42 | 2 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 145 | 62 | 29 | 0 | 63 | -71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 456 | 417 | 62 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 29 | 166 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 149 | 216 | 254 | 471 | 106 | 217 | 36 | 6 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 128 | 113 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 150 | 242 | 221 | 463 | 71 | 200 | 29 | 11 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 805 | 742 | 109 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 47 | 293 | 11 | 28 | 13 | 147 | 209 | 224 | 432 | 77 | 225 | 36 | 6 | 193 | 17 | -80 | +0 | +0 | -5 | +17 | -6.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 599 | 88 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 38 | 237 | 9 | 23 | 10 | 147 | 209 | 222 | 431 | 75 | 226 | 36 | 6 | 193 | 17 | -64 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -5.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 97 PAwOBA .254 → .193 (−61)K% 21.6% → 30.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.65% | ÷0.982 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.53% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 11.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.25% | ÷1.009 | ×0.920 | ×0.983 | ×0.990 | 13.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.78% | ÷0.974 | ×0.830 | ×0.983 | ×0.990 | 5.62% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.039 | ×0.910 | ×0.983 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.279 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 108, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.
Result: wOBA .254 → .193; ISO .050 → .040; BABIP .220 → .192. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Tigers · 31 PAwOBA .412 → .291 (−121)K% 16.1% → 23.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.13% | ÷0.973 | ×1.440 | — | — | 23.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.90% | ÷0.978 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 7.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.18% | ÷1.018 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 14.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 6.71% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.990 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 9.09% | ÷0.990 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 6.91% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 104, 2B 88, 3B 98, K 95, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .412 → .291; ISO .296 → .215; BABIP .300 → .224. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 456 PAwOBA .271 → .207 (−64)K% 26.5% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.54% | ÷0.988 | ×1.360 | — | — | 36.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.21% | ÷1.017 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.54% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.96% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×0.984 | — | 15.32% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.95% | ÷0.992 | ×0.830 | ×0.984 | — | 4.07% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.12% | ÷1.016 | ×0.910 | ×0.984 | — | 1.87% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.53% | ÷0.937 | ×0.800 | — | — | 3.02% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 100, 2B 98, 3B 103, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.
Result: wOBA .271 → .207; ISO .139 → .107; BABIP .247 → .217. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 21 PAwOBA .076 → .063 (−13)K% 23.8% → 30.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.81% | ÷1.063 | ×1.360 | — | — | 30.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷0.974 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.76% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 3.83% |
| Singles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.025 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 6.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.885 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.904 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.895 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 105, 2B 77, 3B 81, K 113, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .076 → .063; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .067 → .062. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Tigers West · 200 PAwOBA .246 → .159 (−87)K% 29.0% → 41.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 2.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.50% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 1.09% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 21.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 4.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .246 → .159; ISO .043 → .025; BABIP .333 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).