Nick Bennett

P Nashville Sounds

Age 29 LHP 6'4" / 210 lbs AAA peak 0.2 · 2027

Overview

AAAPROSPECT

MLB%10%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	24	MIX2 levels	26	24	125	5.20	4.30	22.9%	8.5%	—	K 18.6% · BB 8.7% · FIP 5.03
2023	25	MIX2 levels	33	3	65	4.43	4.08	22.4%	8.7%	—	K 18.4% · BB 9.9% · FIP 4.83
2024	26	AAAMIL	16	4	35	5.09	4.83	14.4%	8.8%	—	K 12.4% · BB 7.9% · FIP 5.13
2027PROJ	29	MLBMIL	3	3	21	4.68	4.68	18.7%	8.7%	0.1
2028PROJ37% MLB	30	MLBMIL	1	1	7	4.75	4.82	18.8%	9.1%	0.0

Next 2 projected WAR 0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsRoy Merritt (age 30) · Tyler Alexander (age 29) · Brad Mills (age 29)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 106114vR 122

ERA4.68

FIP4.68

K%18.7%

BB%8.7%

K-BB%10.0%

Proj IP21

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 21 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2019	21	A MLE	Wisconsin Timber Rattlers	5	3	20	82	24	4	1	60%	4.1	21.7%	5.8%	15.9%	1.6%	2.21	2.85	—
2019	21	A RAW	Wisconsin Timber Rattlers	5	3	20	82	24	4	1	60%	4.1	29.3%	4.9%	24.4%	1.2%	2.21	1.97	—
2021	23	MIX MLE	2 levels	22	17	103	446	115	42	17	77%	4.7	20.2%	10.6%	9.7%	4.6%	4.47	5.25	—
2021	23	MIX RAW	2 levels	22	17	103	446	115	42	17	77%	4.7	25.8%	9.4%	16.4%	3.8%	4.47	4.24	—
2022	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	26	24	125	551	126	47	20	92%	4.8	18.6%	8.7%	9.9%	4.4%	5.20	5.03	—
2022	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	26	24	125	551	126	47	20	92%	4.8	22.9%	8.5%	14.3%	3.6%	5.20	4.30	—
2023	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	33	3	65	286	64	25	9	9%	2.0	18.4%	9.9%	8.5%	3.7%	4.43	4.83	—
2023	25	MIX RAW	2 levels	33	3	65	286	64	25	9	9%	2.0	22.4%	8.7%	13.6%	3.1%	4.43	4.08	—
2024	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	16	4	35	160	23	14	5	25%	2.2	12.4%	7.9%	4.5%	3.8%	5.09	5.13	—
2024	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	16	4	35	160	23	14	5	25%	2.2	12.4%	7.9%	4.5%	3.8%	5.09	5.13	—
2024	26	AAA RAW	Nashville Sounds	16	4	35	160	23	14	5	25%	2.2	14.4%	8.8%	5.6%	3.1%	5.09	4.83	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	29	MLB	MIL	3	3	21	89	17	8	3	100%	7.0	18.7%	8.7%	10.0%	3.0%	4.68	4.68	+0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	30	MLB MLE	MIL	3	3	20	84	16	8	3	100%	6.7	18.8%	9.1%	9.7%	3.2%	4.75	4.82	+0.0
2028	30	MLB CTX	MIL	1	1	7	30	6	3	1	100%	7.0	18.8%	9.1%	9.7%	3.2%	4.75	4.82	+0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		1	1	7	31	6	3	1	100%	7.4	18.8%	9.1%	9.7%	3.2%	4.75	4.44	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		29	29	200	844	163	82	27	100%	6.8	18.8%	9.1%	9.7%	3.2%	4.75	4.44	+1.1
Career	—	MLE		102	51	348	1525	283	141	62	50%	3.4	18.6%	9.2%	9.3%	4.1%	4.66	4.95	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		59	29	200	876	163	81	36	50%	3.4	18.6%	9.2%	9.3%	4.1%	4.66	4.95	+0.2

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Nick Bennett (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.68	18.7%	8.7%	3.0%	—	4.82	18.8%	9.7%	20	+0.14	—	—	—
Roy Merritt L 2016 · 3.93 FIP	30	SP-	3.93	13.3%	5.9%	2.2%	.293	3.95	16.2%	10.4%	116	+0.02	3.93	129	76
Tyler Alexander L 2021 · 5.27 FIP	29	SW	5.27	15.7%	10.7%	3.9%	.272	—	—	—	—	—	5.27	128	71
Brad Mills L 2014 · 5.61 FIP	29	SP-	5.61	18.8%	10.9%	5.0%	.364	5.00	14.5%	4.0%	182	-0.61	4.22	243	70
Everett Teaford L 2012 · 5.47 FIP	28	SW	5.47	13.3%	8.0%	4.5%	.291	4.42	13.9%	6.3%	103	-1.05	4.42	208	68
John Rheinecker L 2007 · 5.13 FIP	28	SW	5.13	16.7%	10.9%	3.8%	.317	—	—	—	—	—	4.14	121	67
Onelki Garcia L 2017 · 4.02 FIP	27	SP-	4.02	16.5%	9.3%	2.1%	.328	—	—	—	—	—	2.99	164	65
Kelvin Marte L 2017 · 4.74 FIP	29	SW	4.74	16.1%	11.4%	2.8%	.300	5.25	12.0%	1.2%	71	+0.51	3.44	360	65
Duane Below L 2015 · 3.63 FIP	29	SW	3.63	12.5%	3.7%	2.0%	.266	4.57	14.7%	9.6%	140	+0.94	3.63	265	65
Matt Whitehouse L 2019 · 4.07 FIP	28	SW	4.07	20.1%	10.9%	2.3%	.339	—	—	—	—	—	3.37	353	65
Danny Wirchansky L 2024 · 4.47 FIP	27	SP-	4.47	16.2%	7.4%	3.3%	.246	5.88	13.0%	0.2%	68	+1.41	4.47	179	64
Miguel Pena L 2019 · 5.08 FIP	28	SW	5.08	16.0%	7.0%	4.4%	.369	—	—	—	—	—	2.98	282	62
Jack Snodgrass L 2016 · 5.01 FIP	28	SP-	5.01	15.7%	10.1%	3.6%	.305	—	—	—	—	—	4.66	118	62
Randy Keisler L 2005 · 5.07 FIP	29	SW	5.07	16.4%	9.9%	3.8%	.295	5.51	6.5%	0.0%	17	+0.44	5.07	135	62
Marco Tovar L 2017 · 5.04 FIP	28	SP-	5.04	16.1%	11.3%	3.4%	.317	4.78	12.6%	7.0%	82	-0.26	3.78	327	62
Brian Flynn L 2019 · 4.49 FIP	29	SW	4.49	17.7%	10.1%	2.9%	.333	—	—	—	—	—	3.80	295	62
Enrique Lechuga L 2015 · 4.70 FIP	29	SP-	4.70	10.0%	10.5%	2.0%	.354	3.78	10.5%	4.4%	59	-0.92	3.78	137	62
Kyle Hunter L 2017 · 4.50 FIP	28	SU	4.50	14.0%	6.1%	3.3%	.335	—	—	—	—	—	4.32	188	61
Matt Lujan L 2017 · 4.69 FIP	28	SP-	4.69	14.3%	6.4%	3.6%	.348	—	—	—	—	—	4.06	227	61
Scott Downs L 2005 · 4.22 FIP	29	SP-	4.22	18.4%	8.4%	2.9%	.283	3.29	20.5%	12.9%	206	-0.93	2.68	748	61
Edgar Olmos L 2017 · 3.64 FIP	27	SW	3.64	18.9%	9.7%	1.7%	.252	—	—	—	—	—	3.19	203	60